Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do so many idiots think they're entitled to plant whatever they want right on the property lines? Huge trees on property lines can dmage fences, foundations, sewer lines, and add thousands of dollars in extra costs other neighbors since they'll have to get their gutters unclogged regularly a lot more. Not to mention all of the risks for debris that can fall and damage structures..
If you want a gigantic tree in your yard, that's fine. Put it well in your property and away from others' homes and the property lines. If you insist putting a tree in property lines, use root barriers like a responsible person or simply go with far smaller dwarf trees that pose much less risk for structural damage to peoples' homes.
So much entitlement people feel the have over other peoples' property. You going to pay $80k when my home's foundation needs to be fixed when your tree's roots cause dage or pay $50k when your stupid tree destroyed my sewer line and the whole thing needs to be dug up?
OP didn’t say the tree was planted on the property line. It’s possible the OP’s house was expanded and now too close to the border. Trees increase property value. OP should thank their neighbor.
Trees only create nuisance value when they are planted inappropriately. We had to pay $5k to remove a gigantic silver maple that some idiot had planted 10 ft from our front window.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do so many idiots think they're entitled to plant whatever they want right on the property lines? Huge trees on property lines can dmage fences, foundations, sewer lines, and add thousands of dollars in extra costs other neighbors since they'll have to get their gutters unclogged regularly a lot more. Not to mention all of the risks for debris that can fall and damage structures..
If you want a gigantic tree in your yard, that's fine. Put it well in your property and away from others' homes and the property lines. If you insist putting a tree in property lines, use root barriers like a responsible person or simply go with far smaller dwarf trees that pose much less risk for structural damage to peoples' homes.
So much entitlement people feel the have over other peoples' property. You going to pay $80k when my home's foundation needs to be fixed when your tree's roots cause dage or pay $50k when your stupid tree destroyed my sewer line and the whole thing needs to be dug up?
OP didn’t say the tree was planted on the property line. It’s possible the OP’s house was expanded and now too close to the border. Trees increase property value. OP should thank their neighbor.
Anonymous wrote:Why do so many idiots think they're entitled to plant whatever they want right on the property lines? Huge trees on property lines can dmage fences, foundations, sewer lines, and add thousands of dollars in extra costs other neighbors since they'll have to get their gutters unclogged regularly a lot more. Not to mention all of the risks for debris that can fall and damage structures..
If you want a gigantic tree in your yard, that's fine. Put it well in your property and away from others' homes and the property lines. If you insist putting a tree in property lines, use root barriers like a responsible person or simply go with far smaller dwarf trees that pose much less risk for structural damage to peoples' homes.
So much entitlement people feel the have over other peoples' property. You going to pay $80k when my home's foundation needs to be fixed when your tree's roots cause dage or pay $50k when your stupid tree destroyed my sewer line and the whole thing needs to be dug up?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:at my country house, I have a few very old tulip poplars, a lot of regular poplars, and a smattering of many other trees. I’ve lost some big branches from the tulip poplars but they are resilient - a lot of other trees have come down over the years, especially with some of the recent strong summer storms. Never lost a tulip poplar or have one experience fatal damage. I have some that are probably well over 100 years old. They’re not my favorite trees, but I’m not sure it’s worth panicking over.
Is your country house on as small a lot as OP's?
The size of the lot has nothing to do with it unless you think trees on small lots fall down more than trees on large lots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Some people really hate/fear trees” is one of the things I’ve learned from dcum.
It's classy to have big, well-maintained trees
It's low class not have trees, cut down healthy trees, or try to destroy your neighbors trees
It’s low class to plant something that will benefit you and inconvenience your neighbors.
A big, healthy tree is a net benefit to the entire neighborhood. Classy
Weed trees benefit no one.
It's a native tree so it's not a weed. It benefits the earth.
So put it in your yard so it benefits your earth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Some people really hate/fear trees” is one of the things I’ve learned from dcum.
It's classy to have big, well-maintained trees
It's low class not have trees, cut down healthy trees, or try to destroy your neighbors trees
It’s low class to plant something that will benefit you and inconvenience your neighbors.
A big, healthy tree is a net benefit to the entire neighborhood. Classy
Weed trees benefit no one.
It's a native tree so it's not a weed. It benefits the earth.
So put it in your yard so it benefits your earth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Some people really hate/fear trees” is one of the things I’ve learned from dcum.
It's classy to have big, well-maintained trees
It's low class not have trees, cut down healthy trees, or try to destroy your neighbors trees
It’s low class to plant something that will benefit you and inconvenience your neighbors.
A big, healthy tree is a net benefit to the entire neighborhood. Classy
Weed trees benefit no one.
It's a native tree so it's not a weed. It benefits the earth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Some people really hate/fear trees” is one of the things I’ve learned from dcum.
It's classy to have big, well-maintained trees
It's low class not have trees, cut down healthy trees, or try to destroy your neighbors trees
It’s low class to plant something that will benefit you and inconvenience your neighbors.
A big, healthy tree is a net benefit to the entire neighborhood. Classy
Weed trees benefit no one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:at my country house, I have a few very old tulip poplars, a lot of regular poplars, and a smattering of many other trees. I’ve lost some big branches from the tulip poplars but they are resilient - a lot of other trees have come down over the years, especially with some of the recent strong summer storms. Never lost a tulip poplar or have one experience fatal damage. I have some that are probably well over 100 years old. They’re not my favorite trees, but I’m not sure it’s worth panicking over.
Is your country house on as small a lot as OP's?
The size of the lot has nothing to do with it unless you think trees on small lots fall down more than trees on large lots.