Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of teams chose to not share the team ladder because there are parents who will decide that they know better than the head coach and start debating the line up for A meets. It is a headache coaches and team reps don’t want to deal with. And yes the fastest kids always get to swim but if the same kid is the fastest in all 4 strokes and can only do 2 on Saturday those two events may change week to week based on match ups which impacts which swimmer who is lower on the ladder also gets an opportunity to race week to week….
Very few kids have top times in all four strokes. Usually it’s the edge cases (kids with a couple do too times and a couple of 2-4 times) that cause questions. And for good reason. Transparency will set you free. The data is the data. Unless you’re up to no good, more is better.
I think you missed the point of the previous post. If Sam is 1-2 in all four strokes, which events he swims might determine whether someone who is 4 or 5 in a particular stroke makes the A meet in any given week. Assume, for example, Sam and Ben are 1-2 across the board and Mike is 5th on the ladder in free (his best stroke and his highest ranking on the ladder). If neither Sam or Ben swim free, Mike is top 3 among the remaining options. If Sam and/or Ben swim free, then it will depend whether the kids ranked 3 and 4 are in free or other events.
I didn’t miss the point. Nothing you just said supports keeping the data secret. If anything, it means the data, including seed times, should be public so parents understand why kids are swimming in which events. I have seen enough to know that shenanigans happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of teams chose to not share the team ladder because there are parents who will decide that they know better than the head coach and start debating the line up for A meets. It is a headache coaches and team reps don’t want to deal with. And yes the fastest kids always get to swim but if the same kid is the fastest in all 4 strokes and can only do 2 on Saturday those two events may change week to week based on match ups which impacts which swimmer who is lower on the ladder also gets an opportunity to race week to week….
Very few kids have top times in all four strokes. Usually it’s the edge cases (kids with a couple do too times and a couple of 2-4 times) that cause questions. And for good reason. Transparency will set you free. The data is the data. Unless you’re up to no good, more is better.
I think you missed the point of the previous post. If Sam is 1-2 in all four strokes, which events he swims might determine whether someone who is 4 or 5 in a particular stroke makes the A meet in any given week. Assume, for example, Sam and Ben are 1-2 across the board and Mike is 5th on the ladder in free (his best stroke and his highest ranking on the ladder). If neither Sam or Ben swim free, Mike is top 3 among the remaining options. If Sam and/or Ben swim free, then it will depend whether the kids ranked 3 and 4 are in free or other events.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of teams chose to not share the team ladder because there are parents who will decide that they know better than the head coach and start debating the line up for A meets. It is a headache coaches and team reps don’t want to deal with. And yes the fastest kids always get to swim but if the same kid is the fastest in all 4 strokes and can only do 2 on Saturday those two events may change week to week based on match ups which impacts which swimmer who is lower on the ladder also gets an opportunity to race week to week….
Very few kids have top times in all four strokes. Usually it’s the edge cases (kids with a couple do too times and a couple of 2-4 times) that cause questions. And for good reason. Transparency will set you free. The data is the data. Unless you’re up to no good, more is better.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of teams chose to not share the team ladder because there are parents who will decide that they know better than the head coach and start debating the line up for A meets. It is a headache coaches and team reps don’t want to deal with. And yes the fastest kids always get to swim but if the same kid is the fastest in all 4 strokes and can only do 2 on Saturday those two events may change week to week based on match ups which impacts which swimmer who is lower on the ladder also gets an opportunity to race week to week….
Anonymous wrote:If you aren't competitive to win A meets, jockeying for position is missing the point of what you need out of swim team. Exercise and improve your strength and skill, and have fun with friends..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One of my kids uses the B meets to try to move up the ladder to make A meets or better lanes for A meets. So she will strategically look at which strokes she thinks she can drop time to move up relative to others on the team.
The other two just pick the two events they like the best.
Both systems are fine with me
We want to do this because we know one kid is very close and beating an A meet swimmer in some strokes but we can only see our own times online. Can’t see anyone else’s
Here you go:
http://www.mcsl.org/Results2.aspx
We are in NVSL. And doesn’t help that we have the same thing but it’s only A meet and everyone can only swim 2 strokes in A meets.
Your team doesn't circulate a ladder? Our team does after each meet.
Or even if they don’t circulate the ladder, they never provide the results of a meet, they only give each kid their own times? This doesn’t make any sense. I’m aware of some teams that don’t circulate the ladder, but I’m not aware of any that don’t provide complete meet results.
Agree! Curious if any teams provide the meet sheet with times before the meet? We were told it was an NVSL rule that they can’t but I can’t find it. Plus, that seems ridiculous since 90% of the kids have times on the NVSL website.
The teams in the division vote, or come to a consensus. Most divisions choose to not print the times, but it’s not a steadfast NVSL rule.
What a strange consensus - what is the rational, do you know? MCSL 'A' and 'B' meets have a program/heat sheets w/ seed times provided in advance. I think most, if not all club meets have the same. Very odd that this is not also done in NVSL.
Meet sheets with times should be available to everyone. It is ridiculous it isn’t. While you might get more questions from parents, it provides much needed transparency and keeps everyone honest. I know one team that uses times from past years to seed meets and that is just wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One of my kids uses the B meets to try to move up the ladder to make A meets or better lanes for A meets. So she will strategically look at which strokes she thinks she can drop time to move up relative to others on the team.
The other two just pick the two events they like the best.
Both systems are fine with me
We want to do this because we know one kid is very close and beating an A meet swimmer in some strokes but we can only see our own times online. Can’t see anyone else’s
Here you go:
http://www.mcsl.org/Results2.aspx
We are in NVSL. And doesn’t help that we have the same thing but it’s only A meet and everyone can only swim 2 strokes in A meets.
Your team doesn't circulate a ladder? Our team does after each meet.
Or even if they don’t circulate the ladder, they never provide the results of a meet, they only give each kid their own times? This doesn’t make any sense. I’m aware of some teams that don’t circulate the ladder, but I’m not aware of any that don’t provide complete meet results.
Agree! Curious if any teams provide the meet sheet with times before the meet? We were told it was an NVSL rule that they can’t but I can’t find it. Plus, that seems ridiculous since 90% of the kids have times on the NVSL website.
The teams in the division vote, or come to a consensus. Most divisions choose to not print the times, but it’s not a steadfast NVSL rule.
What a strange consensus - what is the rational, do you know? MCSL 'A' and 'B' meets have a program/heat sheets w/ seed times provided in advance. I think most, if not all club meets have the same. Very odd that this is not also done in NVSL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you aren't competitive to win A meets, jockeying for position is missing the point of what you need out of swim team. Exercise and improve your strength and skill, and have fun with friends..
I couldn’t disagree more. Swimming in an a meet is special. The older kids do things like chalk the younger kid’s driveway, carry them on their shoulders etc. having a goal of making an a meet is a great goal for a summer swimmer. Oh and they will also exercise, improve strength, and have fun with friends.
Anonymous wrote:If you aren't competitive to win A meets, jockeying for position is missing the point of what you need out of swim team. Exercise and improve your strength and skill, and have fun with friends..