Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would be the concern?
+1 Obey laws and.no.concerns.
I mean, why don’t we just have a cop personally follow you around all day to watch just in case you break any laws? If you obey the law, what possible objection could you have?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Clear invasion of privacy.
Really, we have a right to the privacy of our license plate number? I don't think so. Of course, I'm not a constitutional lawyer, but I'm fairly certain you don't.
Having a log file mapping your daily movements creates a potential source of serious abuse. That kind of information is very powerful and should not be left open to abuse by loosely regulated and secretive groups of people.
DP here. Who are the loosely regulated and secretive people? I’m wondering how you think this information could be used.
FlockSafety, a private third party, will provide the cameras and systems. Very little regulation exists about the collection of these types of data by non-governmental agencies.
Wikipedia is a terrible source, but it's a starting point. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flock_Safety FlockSafety claims to have installations in 1500 cities. That's a reasonably large surveillance network. So what is their retention policy for the collected data? To whom do they sell the data? They claim the customer owns all the data, which expires after 30 days. Of course, Facebook has made similar claims about protecting data. FlockSafety can't ignore a valid warrant for specific information from any federal or local agencies.
FCPD plans to install the plate readers in high-crime areas. That's "broken window" policing which hasn't gone over very well in the past or present. DC is still struggling to explain why the speed cameras appear to be concentrated in lower-income, i.e., minority, neighborhoods. Can FCPD explain why they suspect that more felons are driving around in high-crime neighborhoods without examining the actual crimes causing the high-crime rate? Does excessive graffiti count as high-crime? High crime areas are a dubious metric given the undefined nature of the specific types of crime being targeted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I hope they crack down on the paper tags that are EVERYWHERE.
You might consider how well an automated plate reader works on a fake paper tag.
An automated plate reader that can't pick up a fake tag would be a fail in my book. That, and the bogus "Sovereign Citizen" plates.
You might want to think about this for a second. It's a fake tag. It doesn't link to anything. You would still need an officer to stop the car at some point. Since these are automated plate readers, no officer stands around waiting to pull someone over. It will only catch the people who bother to have valid plates.
Sounds like that stupid gun argument
No. It reads the tag. If the tag is fake, stolen, paper or missing it reads, records and sends an alert. The alerts are sent to police in the area. These are not dumb non linked programs. The reader can identify the color, model and make of the car. Some they also have facial recognition.
In most jurisdictions that use readers, the readers are on every police cars. They are expanding that to include buses(public and school), parking enforcement, emergency vehicles and all major roads. You can actually track a tags travel history back to a neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:Caught these guys coming from Maryland. Most likely taking the car to a chop shop in Fairfax Co.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I hope they crack down on the paper tags that are EVERYWHERE.
You might consider how well an automated plate reader works on a fake paper tag.
An automated plate reader that can't pick up a fake tag would be a fail in my book. That, and the bogus "Sovereign Citizen" plates.
You might want to think about this for a second. It's a fake tag. It doesn't link to anything. You would still need an officer to stop the car at some point. Since these are automated plate readers, no officer stands around waiting to pull someone over. It will only catch the people who bother to have valid plates.
Sounds like that stupid gun argument
No. It reads the tag. If the tag is fake, stolen, paper or missing it reads, records and sends an alert. The alerts are sent to police in the area. These are not dumb non linked programs. The reader can identify the color, model and make of the car. Some they also have facial recognition.
In most jurisdictions that use readers, the readers are on every police cars. They are expanding that to include buses(public and school), parking enforcement, emergency vehicles and all major roads. You can actually track a tags travel history back to a neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would be the concern?
+1 Obey laws and.no.concerns.
I mean, why don’t we just have a cop personally follow you around all day to watch just in case you break any laws? If you obey the law, what possible objection could you have?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I hope they crack down on the paper tags that are EVERYWHERE.
You might consider how well an automated plate reader works on a fake paper tag.
An automated plate reader that can't pick up a fake tag would be a fail in my book. That, and the bogus "Sovereign Citizen" plates.
You might want to think about this for a second. It's a fake tag. It doesn't link to anything. You would still need an officer to stop the car at some point. Since these are automated plate readers, no officer stands around waiting to pull someone over. It will only catch the people who bother to have valid plates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Clear invasion of privacy.
Really, we have a right to the privacy of our license plate number? I don't think so. Of course, I'm not a constitutional lawyer, but I'm fairly certain you don't.
Having a log file mapping your daily movements creates a potential source of serious abuse. That kind of information is very powerful and should not be left open to abuse by loosely regulated and secretive groups of people.
Exactly. Anyone who thinks this is a good idea should visit China to see how it feels to be tracked.
Yes. Fairfax is China. That’s it.
Increasingly, yes.
China and North Korea love mass surveillance programs like this to make sure their citizens stay inline.
Why do you like that kind of model for society?
Exactly. They have no guaranteed God-given freedoms like we do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I hope they crack down on the paper tags that are EVERYWHERE.
You might consider how well an automated plate reader works on a fake paper tag.
An automated plate reader that can't pick up a fake tag would be a fail in my book. That, and the bogus "Sovereign Citizen" plates.
You might want to think about this for a second. It's a fake tag. It doesn't link to anything. You would still need an officer to stop the car at some point. Since these are automated plate readers, no officer stands around waiting to pull someone over. It will only catch the people who bother to have valid plates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Clear invasion of privacy.
Really, we have a right to the privacy of our license plate number? I don't think so. Of course, I'm not a constitutional lawyer, but I'm fairly certain you don't.
Having a log file mapping your daily movements creates a potential source of serious abuse. That kind of information is very powerful and should not be left open to abuse by loosely regulated and secretive groups of people.
Exactly. Anyone who thinks this is a good idea should visit China to see how it feels to be tracked.
Yes. Fairfax is China. That’s it.
Increasingly, yes.
China and North Korea love mass surveillance programs like this to make sure their citizens stay inline.
Why do you like that kind of model for society?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I hope they crack down on the paper tags that are EVERYWHERE.
You might consider how well an automated plate reader works on a fake paper tag.
An automated plate reader that can't pick up a fake tag would be a fail in my book. That, and the bogus "Sovereign Citizen" plates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would be the concern?
+1 Obey laws and.no.concerns.
I mean, why don’t we just have a cop personally follow you around all day to watch just in case you break any laws? If you obey the law, what possible objection could you have?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would be the concern?
+1 Obey laws and.no.concerns.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I hope they crack down on the paper tags that are EVERYWHERE.
You might consider how well an automated plate reader works on a fake paper tag.