Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Alien life forms in our galaxy are very unlikely to exist, and if they do, they exist in the form of single-celled organisms.
Absolutely mathematically false.
lol what math could bear on this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Alien life forms in our galaxy are very unlikely to exist, and if they do, they exist in the form of single-celled organisms.
Absolutely mathematically false.
Anonymous wrote:
Alien life forms in our galaxy are very unlikely to exist, and if they do, they exist in the form of single-celled organisms.
Anonymous wrote:The only alien I see is Plaskett's aide. Wow - that chick's eyes looked otherworldly
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I watched the full hearings - interesting, but I'm still skeptical. I need more concrete proof, and not "well I could tell you but you need TS/SCI and a SCIF"
The testimony about the cubes in the sky or the oval shaped object didn’t convince you that something weird is happening?
Lots of people are able to come up with weird, but convincing stories about all kinds of things. But I come from the school of "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I watched the full hearings - interesting, but I'm still skeptical. I need more concrete proof, and not "well I could tell you but you need TS/SCI and a SCIF"
The testimony about the cubes in the sky or the oval shaped object didn’t convince you that something weird is happening?
Anonymous wrote:What if the Angel who visited Mary was an alien. That the Immaculate Conception was an alien impregnation. That Jesus could walk on water and heal the sick because he was an alien?
Anonymous wrote:I watched the full hearings - interesting, but I'm still skeptical. I need more concrete proof, and not "well I could tell you but you need TS/SCI and a SCIF"
Anonymous wrote:It’s implausible to me that beings could travel bazillions of miles and then basically crash zipping around the sky. I bet this is nothing.
Anonymous wrote:I watched the full hearings - interesting, but I'm still skeptical. I need more concrete proof, and not "well I could tell you but you need TS/SCI and a SCIF"