Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is a link to the AG’s letter stating that MCLS may not charge for required materials: https://www.scribd.com/document/18771202/KameenOAGLetter
That's not quite the same as charging for *damage* to required materials.
Normal usage is not damage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is a link to the AG’s letter stating that MCLS may not charge for required materials: https://www.scribd.com/document/18771202/KameenOAGLetter
That's not quite the same as charging for *damage* to required materials.
Normal usage is not damage.
Anonymous wrote:As someone who builds computers for fun, laptops fail for any number of reasons. The batteries are generally a culprit, but it takes two minutes to open the Acer 740 or Lenovo 300e and swap it out. (I have not tackled a Acer 770, but I imagine it's the same.) The biggest expense is actually the display, which can cost $100 to $150, brand-new. (I used to source them from ebay for not much.)
As much as it may make sense to charge students for damage, a lot of it is indeed accidental, and the district invested in these laptops, so it is on them. Only in the case of intentional harm should a student be obligated to pay back the school system. (Unless it's someone with special needs who might not know what they're doing or just acting out and should not have a laptop in their hands.)
Anonymous wrote:I think it depends on the media person in your school. Some are nicer and some are horrible. Speaking from experience. It's like they are power hungry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have you considered just not paying.
They are holding his High School Diploma hostage over this
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work in MCPS IT and schools are no longer supposed to charge obligations for Chromebooks. If it is physically back to the school, he is fine. Just respond with an email that it stopped working and he physically returned it on X date. And of course return the new one they gave you too. It was probably just a problem that it didn’t get checked in properly.
What does this mean? Our school recently sent out a list of charges for missing keys, damage to screen, Chromebook not working, etc. MCPS must still be charging. Otherwise where would our school administration have gotten this list?
They got the list because it used to be the policy. It’s no longer the policy. They’re doing things the old/wrong way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here is a link to the AG’s letter stating that MCLS may not charge for required materials: https://www.scribd.com/document/18771202/KameenOAGLetter
That's not quite the same as charging for *damage* to required materials.
Anonymous wrote:Here is a link to the AG’s letter stating that MCLS may not charge for required materials: https://www.scribd.com/document/18771202/KameenOAGLetter
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:just pay it. FFS
What a stupid response. Did you not read that they can not do this? I wouldn't tolerate this for 2 seconds and would be in the supers office. My kid with sns has to have a computer to work and the first one they gave him had visible damage and would take 15 minutes 2 start and died regularly. I walked it back to the office and he had a new functioning one the next day.
OP should have done that.