Anonymous wrote:It sounds good and reasonable for nanny share pricing. Even if they are wealthy she should still charge what she is worth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Definitely would try this! (BTW this is consistent with CA law - you never know who might be lurking 😉)
That’s true.
I am in CA. I guess childcare is just much pricier here than DC. I figured it would be the same. $550 is a deal to me for what we are getting.
Not iny experience. My sister in CA pays less for a nanny than I do in DC. Undocumented workers drive down wages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She's clearly not doing it for the money, but for her kid's benefit. I'd go for it.
I mean $2,200 a month, most likely tax free, isn’t nothing. That is a pretty nice side hustle and it gives her kid a playmate as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's an insane amount of money for 3 days in her home, which is easy for her. Hard no if she's not willing to become licensed. For that amount she should be licensed.
Where do you live? We do a nanny share in our home and on our own we are paying $600 a week for about 40 hours.
There are cheaper options, there always are but is it worth it?
A nanny share is a different situation than this one. That also seems high for a share.
It’s $15 per hour per family.
If you consider that high for childcare I feel incredibly sorry for your nanny.
I'd never higher a nanny. And, I'd never do what OP is saying
Higher than what?
I’m going to assume you own a home daycare and are angry people prefer situations like this. Home daycares have a bad reputation for a reason. I’ve seen licensed centers (both home and traditional) that I wouldn’t even send a dog to.
Anonymous wrote:$550 a week or a month? You posted both.
I'd check references really carefully. But I would do that anyway. It could be great, but I would worry a little that she's doing this because she thinks it's fun, or because she's focused on the benefit to her own child, and that she might quit abruptly if she realizes it isn't that fun to have 2, or that she might prioritize her daughter over your child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Definitely would try this! (BTW this is consistent with CA law - you never know who might be lurking 😉)
That’s true.
I am in CA. I guess childcare is just much pricier here than DC. I figured it would be the same. $550 is a deal to me for what we are getting.
Not iny experience. My sister in CA pays less for a nanny than I do in DC. Undocumented workers drive down wages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Definitely would try this! (BTW this is consistent with CA law - you never know who might be lurking 😉)
That’s true.
I am in CA. I guess childcare is just much pricier here than DC. I figured it would be the same. $550 is a deal to me for what we are getting.
Anonymous wrote:$550 a week or a month? You posted both.
I'd check references really carefully. But I would do that anyway. It could be great, but I would worry a little that she's doing this because she thinks it's fun, or because she's focused on the benefit to her own child, and that she might quit abruptly if she realizes it isn't that fun to have 2, or that she might prioritize her daughter over your child.