Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whitman boundary may change due to Woodward High School Opening. Apart from that, there is not much difference.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1128527.page
Could Churchill's boundary change due to Woodward?
No, Churchill is not part of the Woodward boundary study, but it is expected to be part of the Crown boundary study.
The current CIP includes other five high schools and Churchill is not one of them. Even if MCPS does include it, the worst case is that a small portion goes to Wootton. It’s not a big deal.
The lines between Churchill, Wootton, and RM could be redrawn.
The only part connecting to RM is Beverly farm ES and a big portion of it is in walking distance to Churchill.
The cluster boundary for all the clusters will probably change, and that includes adding some areas to the cluster, not just taking neighborhoods away.
I don’t see much change to Churchill and it’s already over capacity. It’s not on the Crown study plan yet either.
Being over capacity is a good reason for boundary changes, no?
As I said, from the current map, I only see a small portion goes to Wootton, which is not a big deal.
Think bigger. The whole northern and western sections could be part of a boundary change with NW, QO, Crown, and Wootton.
It could, but kids from Churchill needs to be bused much further to be redrawn and could got significant number of walkers to busers. Just from the map, it would seem to be the least impacted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whitman boundary may change due to Woodward High School Opening. Apart from that, there is not much difference.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1128527.page
Could Churchill's boundary change due to Woodward?
No, Churchill is not part of the Woodward boundary study, but it is expected to be part of the Crown boundary study.
The current CIP includes other five high schools and Churchill is not one of them. Even if MCPS does include it, the worst case is that a small portion goes to Wootton. It’s not a big deal.
The lines between Churchill, Wootton, and RM could be redrawn.
The only part connecting to RM is Beverly farm ES and a big portion of it is in walking distance to Churchill.
The cluster boundary for all the clusters will probably change, and that includes adding some areas to the cluster, not just taking neighborhoods away.
I don’t see much change to Churchill and it’s already over capacity. It’s not on the Crown study plan yet either.
Being over capacity is a good reason for boundary changes, no?
As I said, from the current map, I only see a small portion goes to Wootton, which is not a big deal.
Think bigger. The whole northern and western sections could be part of a boundary change with NW, QO, Crown, and Wootton.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whitman boundary may change due to Woodward High School Opening. Apart from that, there is not much difference.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1128527.page
Could Churchill's boundary change due to Woodward?
No, Churchill is not part of the Woodward boundary study, but it is expected to be part of the Crown boundary study.
The current CIP includes other five high schools and Churchill is not one of them. Even if MCPS does include it, the worst case is that a small portion goes to Wootton. It’s not a big deal.
The lines between Churchill, Wootton, and RM could be redrawn.
The only part connecting to RM is Beverly farm ES and a big portion of it is in walking distance to Churchill.
The cluster boundary for all the clusters will probably change, and that includes adding some areas to the cluster, not just taking neighborhoods away.
I don’t see much change to Churchill and it’s already over capacity. It’s not on the Crown study plan yet either.
Being over capacity is a good reason for boundary changes, no?
As I said, from the current map, I only see a small portion goes to Wootton, which is not a big deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whitman boundary may change due to Woodward High School Opening. Apart from that, there is not much difference.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1128527.page
Could Churchill's boundary change due to Woodward?
No, Churchill is not part of the Woodward boundary study, but it is expected to be part of the Crown boundary study.
The current CIP includes other five high schools and Churchill is not one of them. Even if MCPS does include it, the worst case is that a small portion goes to Wootton. It’s not a big deal.
The lines between Churchill, Wootton, and RM could be redrawn.
The only part connecting to RM is Beverly farm ES and a big portion of it is in walking distance to Churchill.
The cluster boundary for all the clusters will probably change, and that includes adding some areas to the cluster, not just taking neighborhoods away.
I don’t see much change to Churchill and it’s already over capacity. It’s not on the Crown study plan yet either.
Being over capacity is a good reason for boundary changes, no?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whitman boundary may change due to Woodward High School Opening. Apart from that, there is not much difference.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1128527.page
Could Churchill's boundary change due to Woodward?
Yeah, but as I said I only see a small portion goes to Wootton, which is not a big deal.
No, Churchill is not part of the Woodward boundary study, but it is expected to be part of the Crown boundary study.
The current CIP includes other five high schools and Churchill is not one of them. Even if MCPS does include it, the worst case is that a small portion goes to Wootton. It’s not a big deal.
The lines between Churchill, Wootton, and RM could be redrawn.
The only part connecting to RM is Beverly farm ES and a big portion of it is in walking distance to Churchill.
The cluster boundary for all the clusters will probably change, and that includes adding some areas to the cluster, not just taking neighborhoods away.
I don’t see much change to Churchill and it’s already over capacity. It’s not on the Crown study plan yet either.
Being over capacity is a good reason for boundary changes, no?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whitman boundary may change due to Woodward High School Opening. Apart from that, there is not much difference.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1128527.page
Could Churchill's boundary change due to Woodward?
No, Churchill is not part of the Woodward boundary study, but it is expected to be part of the Crown boundary study.
The current CIP includes other five high schools and Churchill is not one of them. Even if MCPS does include it, the worst case is that a small portion goes to Wootton. It’s not a big deal.
The lines between Churchill, Wootton, and RM could be redrawn.
The only part connecting to RM is Beverly farm ES and a big portion of it is in walking distance to Churchill.
The cluster boundary for all the clusters will probably change, and that includes adding some areas to the cluster, not just taking neighborhoods away.
I don’t see much change to Churchill and it’s already over capacity. It’s not on the Crown study plan yet either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whitman boundary may change due to Woodward High School Opening. Apart from that, there is not much difference.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1128527.page
Could Churchill's boundary change due to Woodward?
No, Churchill is not part of the Woodward boundary study, but it is expected to be part of the Crown boundary study.
The current CIP includes other five high schools and Churchill is not one of them. Even if MCPS does include it, the worst case is that a small portion goes to Wootton. It’s not a big deal.
The lines between Churchill, Wootton, and RM could be redrawn.
The only part connecting to RM is Beverly farm ES and a big portion of it is in walking distance to Churchill.
The cluster boundary for all the clusters will probably change, and that includes adding some areas to the cluster, not just taking neighborhoods away.
I don’t see much change to Churchill and it’s already over capacity. It’s not on the Crown study plan yet either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whitman boundary may change due to Woodward High School Opening. Apart from that, there is not much difference.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1128527.page
Could Churchill's boundary change due to Woodward?
No, Churchill is not part of the Woodward boundary study, but it is expected to be part of the Crown boundary study.
The current CIP includes other five high schools and Churchill is not one of them. Even if MCPS does include it, the worst case is that a small portion goes to Wootton. It’s not a big deal.
The lines between Churchill, Wootton, and RM could be redrawn.
The only part connecting to RM is Beverly farm ES and a big portion of it is in walking distance to Churchill.
The cluster boundary for all the clusters will probably change, and that includes adding some areas to the cluster, not just taking neighborhoods away.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whitman boundary may change due to Woodward High School Opening. Apart from that, there is not much difference.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1128527.page
Could Churchill's boundary change due to Woodward?
No, Churchill is not part of the Woodward boundary study, but it is expected to be part of the Crown boundary study.
The current CIP includes other five high schools and Churchill is not one of them. Even if MCPS does include it, the worst case is that a small portion goes to Wootton. It’s not a big deal.
The lines between Churchill, Wootton, and RM could be redrawn.
The only part connecting to RM is Beverly farm ES and a big portion of it is in walking distance to Churchill.
Anonymous wrote:We definitely need more Hispanics at these schools. MCPS is now majority Hispanic, as is MOCO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whitman boundary may change due to Woodward High School Opening. Apart from that, there is not much difference.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1128527.page
Could Churchill's boundary change due to Woodward?
No, Churchill is not part of the Woodward boundary study, but it is expected to be part of the Crown boundary study.
The current CIP includes other five high schools and Churchill is not one of them. Even if MCPS does include it, the worst case is that a small portion goes to Wootton. It’s not a big deal.
The lines between Churchill, Wootton, and RM could be redrawn.
Depends on how you define "middle-class"...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Churchill has always seemed majority Asian to me.
Our friends left their local elementary school which was 80%+ asian and cliquey.
It's interesting that you consider 32% to be majority Asian-American. The plurality demographic group at Churchill is non-Hispanic white, at 43%.
https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/regulatoryaccountability/glance/currentyear/schools/04602.pdf
While we're at it, let's look at the elementary schools in the Churchill cluster:
Bells Mill: 27% Asian-American, 8% 2+, 41% non-Hispanic white
Seven Locks: 26% Asian-American, <5% 2+, 49% non-Hispanic white
Beverly Farms: 30% Asian-American, 9% 2+, 45% non-Hispanic white
Potomac: 33% Asian-American, 11% 2+, 39% non-Hispanic white
Wayside: 41% Asian-American, 6% 2+, 38% non-Hispanic white
Asian families go where the good schools are. Churchill is an excellent school. As a PP noted, accurately, there is a decent amount of middle-class housing in Potomac that is a factor too.
WHERE??
Anonymous wrote:We definitely need more Hispanics at these schools. MCPS is now majority Hispanic, as is MOCO.