Anonymous wrote:This is a national news story about litigation about a teenager wearing pants.

I mean, I'm republican and I guess this is silly. I'm surprised the school pushed that hard, but also surprised that this resulted in litigation and national attention. It's pants. Under a gown. That's pretty androgynous.

As is a gown apparently?

This is a national news story about litigation about a teenager wearing pants.

I mean, I'm republican and I guess this is silly. I'm surprised the school pushed that hard, but also surprised that this resulted in litigation and national attention. It's pants. Under a gown. That's pretty androgynous.

The Republicans use scare tactics to wind up parents. They are against everything and use culture wars to divert attention from real issues.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yawn. . .

Exactly, who cares what a kid wears under their graduation gown? I see you agree that the school administration should have yawned as they'd already previously yawned when the same kid wore the same clothes at every other school event and prom, right?

It sounds like the principal had no problem but then got a call from the county Superintendent of Education who forced the issue and everybody else caved to the bigot.

Anonymous wrote:Yawn. . .

+1

Anonymous wrote:Yawn. . .

Exactly, who cares what a kid wears under their graduation gown? I see you agree that the school administration should have yawned as they'd already previously yawned when the same kid wore the same clothes at every other school event and prom, right?

Anonymous wrote:Yawn. . .

Yep, just let the kid wear what she wants.

Yawn. . .

Anonymous wrote:Last time it was gay marriage, now it’s this. No big deal, we’ll get through it.

+1. It's always something with conservatives but eventually progressives do win. This is just their new grievance.

Last time it was gay marriage, now it’s this. No big deal, we’ll get through it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Schools shouldn’t have gendered dress code

It is a LOCAL question. Mind your own business.

Agreed - and we're going to bring back slavery. it's our LOCAL thing. Lynching parties and the whole nine yards. Mind your own business.

I’ve never met a soul who wants to bring back slavery. What a stupid lie.

You completely missed their point, didn't you?

Pause, read, think, try to understand the point they are making and try again.

I don’t understand their point. Slavery is constitutionally banned. Nobody wants slavery. So what is the point that slavery is “local”? It sounds like the person is saying I am racist if I don’t support the transvestitism.

First of all yes, there are extremists who think slavery is not a bad system. If you think that is a lie I invite you to read up about modern slavery and also hang out in some extreme right-wing white nationalists chat rooms.

Second of all, what's it to you how other people dress themselves? Really, please tell us why you care so much that you want to regulate what other people wear. How does it harm you physically or mentally if someone wears clothes you perceive -- because of the culture you live in -- to be the "wrong" gendered wardrobe? Specifics for how it harms you and why you think it therefore should be regulated by the state.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Schools shouldn’t have gendered dress code

It is a LOCAL question. Mind your own business.

Agreed - and we're going to bring back slavery. it's our LOCAL thing. Lynching parties and the whole nine yards. Mind your own business.

I’ve never met a soul who wants to bring back slavery. What a stupid lie.

You completely missed their point, didn't you?

Pause, read, think, try to understand the point they are making and try again.

I don’t understand their point. Slavery is constitutionally banned. Nobody wants slavery. So what is the point that slavery is “local”? It sounds like the person is saying I am racist if I don’t support the transvestitism.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You want your boys in sequins at graduation, do it at your own.

Leave us alone. We’ll get along better in this way.

Sounds like you hate liberty and freedom.

I don’t think you know what those words mean. You do you.

Sounds like you want a bigger government to enforce dress codes set by the state.

The school set standards.

Some special interests ran to a judge.

The judge said the school can set standards.

Only government action here was a judicial ruling sought by your kind.

Why does a school need a standard that says girls can't wear pants for graduation?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Schools shouldn’t have gendered dress code

It is a LOCAL question. Mind your own business.

Agreed - and we're going to bring back slavery. it's our LOCAL thing. Lynching parties and the whole nine yards. Mind your own business.

I’ve never met a soul who wants to bring back slavery. What a stupid lie.

You completely missed their point, didn't you?

Pause, read, think, try to understand the point they are making and try again.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Schools shouldn’t have gendered dress code

It is a LOCAL question. Mind your own business.

gt

It’s a parents question. Mind YOUR own business.