Anonymous wrote:Does everyone agree - no voting, military service, driving, drinking, serve on juries, serve in office, drugs either before 25 (when the brain matures) and after 70 (official retirement age)?
And you must take a voting test to be able to vote that includes basic civics?
If so, sign me up!
Anonymous wrote:Does everyone agree - no voting, military service, driving, drinking, serve on juries, serve in office, drugs either before 25 (when the brain matures) and after 70 (official retirement age)?
And you must take a voting test to be able to vote that includes basic civics?
If so, sign me up!
Anonymous wrote:No voting if using tiktok at any age.
Anonymous wrote:Are they still not able to rent a car?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was sent to fight in wars for my country before the age of 25. I don't think it's fair to have people kill and possibly die for their country but have no voice in the political process.
Perfect.
No selective service registrations until 25.
I wasn't in the selective service. I'm exempt due to sex. The people we send to war these days are volunteers. However, if they use the service of people under 25 to fight wars, people under 25 should also be part of the process to select officials.
And, senators who have been to war are less likely to vote for war, while voters who are war veterans are also less likely to vote for hawkish candidates. So we can literally save lives by having more veterans in the process.
The military is 73% male, so you’re effectively saying that women shouldn’t be allowed to vote. Also, people get rejected from attempting to join for reasons outside their control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Surprised no one has mentioned the 26th Amendment. Which stops this conversation in its tracks and makes this a GOP fever dream.
I think everyone here knows that already. An amendment won’t pass, so this convo is kind of pointless.
The conversation asking why someone supposedly "brilliant" like Ramaswamy would propose something blatantly unconstitutional and doomed to failure to drum up votes is worth having.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Surprised no one has mentioned the 26th Amendment. Which stops this conversation in its tracks and makes this a GOP fever dream.
I think everyone here knows that already. An amendment won’t pass, so this convo is kind of pointless.
Anonymous wrote:Surprised no one has mentioned the 26th Amendment. Which stops this conversation in its tracks and makes this a GOP fever dream.
Anonymous wrote:Eye-roll. This is such a boomer solution in search of a problem.
I remember eagerly registering to vote when I turned 18. I voted in the 2006 general election - I was still in high school. I was the ONLY person in high school that voted, as far as I knew. People thought I was such a dork for getting all excited about it. I was in AP American History (got a 5 on the exam) and very eager to see the Democrats crush it and, two years later, see W gone and Obama elected.
Most young people don't vote. College students included - it was complicated enough to register to vote if you went to school in another state. I remember having to register at my dorm address. Or vote absentee from your home state. Both involve paperwork and deadlines which, IMO, are self-sorting. Those who are competent enough to figure out how to vote, should be voting. If you are too lazy or dumb to figure it out, then it's probably for the best that you didn't.