Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a special educator. I don’t see it offensive if someone uses the term special education in reference to a job title, or a process or paperwork. It is offensive if you use it as an adjective describing a student.
SPED as an abbreviation isn’t great to me but if you are using it for something where special education would be appropriate (e.g. a sped teacher) it’s OK.
I really dislike the term special needs.
What are you supposed to call the kids then?
Anonymous wrote:Some kids are now using “acoustic” instead of autistic/sped.
Anonymous wrote:I am a special educator. I don’t see it offensive if someone uses the term special education in reference to a job title, or a process or paperwork. It is offensive if you use it as an adjective describing a student.
SPED as an abbreviation isn’t great to me but if you are using it for something where special education would be appropriate (e.g. a sped teacher) it’s OK.
I really dislike the term special needs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students have used it as a slur for at least a few decades. I have worked in multiple school systems over many years and don't know any school staff that doesn't say it out "Special Ed", probably for that reason.
This was a derogatory slur when I was in ES in the 1960s. Hard to believe that people don’t know this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The special education department at my school is still called the SPED department. What should it be called now?
It should be called SpEd.
Are you serious?
Any way, they both sound the same
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The special education department at my school is still called the SPED department. What should it be called now?
It should be called SpEd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is how the cycle goes. A word is used. People use the word as intended. Word develops a negative connotation because it refers to something that is, frankly, negative. People get offended. People find new word. New word is used as intended. Word develops a negative connotation because it refers to something that is, frankly, negative. People get offended. People find new word. And so on and so on and so on.
100%. I’m old enough to have seen this play out multiple times.
Euphemism treadmill.
Those who don't know history cry and scream to make educated people repeat it.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euphemism
Anonymous wrote:This is how the cycle goes. A word is used. People use the word as intended. Word develops a negative connotation because it refers to something that is, frankly, negative. People get offended. People find new word. New word is used as intended. Word develops a negative connotation because it refers to something that is, frankly, negative. People get offended. People find new word. And so on and so on and so on.
+1. It was a slur when I was in school in the 1980’s! Kids would just call them ‘speds. But, it was not really including the over labeled and over studied kids of today who are diagnosed ADHD and ASD left and right who are super highly functional.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Students have used it as a slur for at least a few decades. I have worked in multiple school systems over many years and don't know any school staff that doesn't say it out "Special Ed", probably for that reason.
This was a derogatory slur when I was in ES in the 1960s. Hard to believe that people don’t know this.