Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

That’s not what she said. She could have said “It will probably take about 2 hours” or “I’ll call you on my way home but figure 3 hours” He’s telling her he has things to do too, and she doesn’t acknowledge. Did Crowder F her up? Has he in the past? The fight sounded two way. My left wing husband rarely raises his voice, and then when I do, accuses me of abuse. It’s a tactic the marriage counselor pointed out to him.

Bro, no. He's clearly mistreating her. The fact that she didn't submit to his demands does not absolve him.

You don't have to defend him. I'm a R, and I think he's awful. He has a long, long history of lying to make himself look better. Don't be a fool.

If they are sharing a car and he wants to spent time doing things on the same day, she needs to state how long she’ll be gone. My husband did this EVERY weekend when bike riding. Would pick a day by weather, tell me he’ll be back when back, and leave me with three littles for the better part of 8 hours while he rode. It’s classic manipulation on her part - why can’t she state a time frame?

Why can't he take an uber? It's not like he's not rich.

+1
He suggested she take one. Why can't he?
I'll also tell you why abuse victims don't state a time frame. If they're even a minute off that "promised" time home, they have to account for it. You think, based on what's on that video, if she said "I'll be back in one hour" and she's back in one hour and 15 minutes, that's going to fly with this a-hole? She's vague because she has to be.
Any guy who suggests his 8-month pregnant wife take an uber to the grocery store (a family chore) so he can go to the gym (personal fun time) is no man.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

That’s not what she said. She could have said “It will probably take about 2 hours” or “I’ll call you on my way home but figure 3 hours” He’s telling her he has things to do too, and she doesn’t acknowledge. Did Crowder F her up? Has he in the past? The fight sounded two way. My left wing husband rarely raises his voice, and then when I do, accuses me of abuse. It’s a tactic the marriage counselor pointed out to him.

Bro, no. He's clearly mistreating her. The fact that she didn't submit to his demands does not absolve him.

You don't have to defend him. I'm a R, and I think he's awful. He has a long, long history of lying to make himself look better. Don't be a fool.

What happened before going on camera? I just came home with extra items for my husband, who’s been sick this week. Despite my nice gesture, I got silence, some sneering, etc. I finally said “It’s ok to just say thank you” He went silent (passive aggression). I’ve learned he wants me to raise my voice so he can then play the victim. I don’t play the game anymore. Marriage is a dynamic. I picked up on that dynamic when she wouldn’t define a time frame when he clearly stated he needed to use the car as well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

That’s not what she said. She could have said “It will probably take about 2 hours” or “I’ll call you on my way home but figure 3 hours” He’s telling her he has things to do too, and she doesn’t acknowledge. Did Crowder F her up? Has he in the past? The fight sounded two way. My left wing husband rarely raises his voice, and then when I do, accuses me of abuse. It’s a tactic the marriage counselor pointed out to him.

Bro, no. He's clearly mistreating her. The fact that she didn't submit to his demands does not absolve him.

You don't have to defend him. I'm a R, and I think he's awful. He has a long, long history of lying to make himself look better. Don't be a fool.

If they are sharing a car and he wants to spent time doing things on the same day, she needs to state how long she’ll be gone. My husband did this EVERY weekend when bike riding. Would pick a day by weather, tell me he’ll be back when back, and leave me with three littles for the better part of 8 hours while he rode. It’s classic manipulation on her part - why can’t she state a time frame?

Why can't he take an uber? It's not like he's not rich.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

That’s not what she said. She could have said “It will probably take about 2 hours” or “I’ll call you on my way home but figure 3 hours” He’s telling her he has things to do too, and she doesn’t acknowledge. Did Crowder F her up? Has he in the past? The fight sounded two way. My left wing husband rarely raises his voice, and then when I do, accuses me of abuse. It’s a tactic the marriage counselor pointed out to him.

These are strange hoops to jump through to justify someone threatening their wife. Like somehow it's okay to threaten if you've never actually been violent. Maybe you're bringing some of your own past to this, but it's not okay to threaten people and it's okay to say that without nitpicking how why she might have deserved it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

That’s not what she said. She could have said “It will probably take about 2 hours” or “I’ll call you on my way home but figure 3 hours” He’s telling her he has things to do too, and she doesn’t acknowledge. Did Crowder F her up? Has he in the past? The fight sounded two way. My left wing husband rarely raises his voice, and then when I do, accuses me of abuse. It’s a tactic the marriage counselor pointed out to him.

Bro, no. He's clearly mistreating her. The fact that she didn't submit to his demands does not absolve him.

You don't have to defend him. I'm a R, and I think he's awful. He has a long, long history of lying to make himself look better. Don't be a fool.

If they are sharing a car and he wants to spent time doing things on the same day, she needs to state how long she’ll be gone. My husband did this EVERY weekend when bike riding. Would pick a day by weather, tell me he’ll be back when back, and leave me with three littles for the better part of 8 hours while he rode. It’s classic manipulation on her part - why can’t she state a time frame?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

That’s not what she said. She could have said “It will probably take about 2 hours” or “I’ll call you on my way home but figure 3 hours” He’s telling her he has things to do too, and she doesn’t acknowledge. Did Crowder F her up? Has he in the past? The fight sounded two way. My left wing husband rarely raises his voice, and then when I do, accuses me of abuse. It’s a tactic the marriage counselor pointed out to him.

Bro, no. He's clearly mistreating her. The fact that she didn't submit to his demands does not absolve him.

You don't have to defend him. I'm a R, and I think he's awful. He has a long, long history of lying to make himself look better. Don't be a fool.

Anonymous wrote:Candice Owen's attorneys sent Crowder a cease and desist over him bizarrely claiming that she is behind the video and is trying to extort him.

He very well might be a complete a$$hat, but the ‘right winger’ in subject line speaks volumes as to OP’s motive for posting. My ex was completely and horribly abusive and he is a BernieBro

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

Did you watch the clip?

Yes

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

That’s not what she said. She could have said “It will probably take about 2 hours” or “I’ll call you on my way home but figure 3 hours” He’s telling her he has things to do too, and she doesn’t acknowledge. Did Crowder F her up? Has he in the past? The fight sounded two way. My left wing husband rarely raises his voice, and then when I do, accuses me of abuse. It’s a tactic the marriage counselor pointed out to him.

Candice Owen's attorneys sent Crowder a cease and desist over him bizarrely claiming that she is behind the video and is trying to extort him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

Did you watch the clip?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?

I know whenever my wife isn't sure how long something is going to take I threaten to F her up.

Anonymous wrote:This.

How people don't see this is beyond me.
What was her life going to look like with him with a child? I don't know this guy or how long ago they got divorced (thank god she's out of there) but that video was absolutely chilling. He was verbally beating her down and it was working. She tried very hard to de-escalate, and it didn't work, because nothing was going to work. He was determined to berate her, and he did. Told her she needed discipline, wasn't wife worthy, and said he didn't love her. How anyone can claim that's not abuse is mind boggling to me.
She was going to be housebound with a child, and the abuse I'm quite sure is continuing through threats related to the child or she's being told what a terrible mother she is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MSN reports that she wanted to take the one car they share to run errands, stating “I’ll be back when I’m back” after he requested a time frame stating he wanted to go to the gym and visit his parents? That’s what preceded that little 30 second clip posted here.

I’ll be back when I’m back? If a man said that to his wife, DCUM would EXPLODE and rightfully so. I would not dream of telling my spouse that and leaving him housebound for an indeterminate length of time.

I'm not surprised that someone came in and cherry picked part of the video in favor of Steven Crowder. Doesn't make it any less pathetic. He tells her she can't take the car - not that he needs the car at X time. It's a manipulation tactic. He tells her she should take an Uber. Why can't he take and Uber. He's literally sitting on the couch smoking, doing nothing, while talking about her "wifely duties."

So, not a good try, and we're not falling for it.

And why do they only have one car? That she then needs to ask for permission to use.

Because she says she’ll be back when she wants to be, which is passive-aggressive. Maybe one car is in the shop?