Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With a kid taking AP tests next week competing for 5s with kids who had 2-3 more weeks on instruction, I understand the benefit of starting earlier. HOWEVER, we need to get out earlier, too. It’s infuriating that they keep shrinking summer.
AP students represent a fraction of the student population, so I don’t think it makes sense to dictate the schedule according to their needs.
Plus, our start date moves up, but then they throw in an extra week of Christmas break and a bunch of teacher workdays, so by the time May rolls around they haven’t actually gotten any more instruction.
There’s not a fixed number of 5s to be awarded, so your kid isn’t competing.
And there’s nothing stopping your kid from picking up a prep book two (or even three!) weeks before school starts.
Tell me how starting 2 weeks earlier hurts your kid? or any kid?
I am just hearing a lot of whining about I don't waaaaant to start 2 weeks earlier!
For younger kids - it cuts into the time we have for special interest camps and vacation. We don’t go on vacation until after summer swim ends the 3rd week of July.
For older kids - it cuts into time to actually relax and rest before they start conditioning for fall sports.
For low income kids - it cuts into time for full-time jobs and earning money.
For teachers - it cuts into time many use to relax before beginning prep for the following year. Unlike most working adults, teachers can’t take vacation whenever they want.
For schools - shorter summer cuts into the time needed to maintain and update school buildings, repair busses, etc.
But no real reasons not to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With a kid taking AP tests next week competing for 5s with kids who had 2-3 more weeks on instruction, I understand the benefit of starting earlier. HOWEVER, we need to get out earlier, too. It’s infuriating that they keep shrinking summer.
AP students represent a fraction of the student population, so I don’t think it makes sense to dictate the schedule according to their needs.
Plus, our start date moves up, but then they throw in an extra week of Christmas break and a bunch of teacher workdays, so by the time May rolls around they haven’t actually gotten any more instruction.
There’s not a fixed number of 5s to be awarded, so your kid isn’t competing.
And there’s nothing stopping your kid from picking up a prep book two (or even three!) weeks before school starts.
Tell me how starting 2 weeks earlier hurts your kid? or any kid?
I am just hearing a lot of whining about I don't waaaaant to start 2 weeks earlier!
But no real reasons not to.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t mind the calendar since the breaks seem good for my kids. What I wish existed was an optional Extended Day camp for full days off. I would gladly pay 1 fee for coverage of all single day holidays. There could be a hybrid option for holidays and early release days.
I bet parents would pay for that even if it was at a central location for each section of Arlington. Like using ATS for ATS, Ashlawn, Tuckahoe, and Cardinal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With a kid taking AP tests next week competing for 5s with kids who had 2-3 more weeks on instruction, I understand the benefit of starting earlier. HOWEVER, we need to get out earlier, too. It’s infuriating that they keep shrinking summer.
AP students represent a fraction of the student population, so I don’t think it makes sense to dictate the schedule according to their needs.
Plus, our start date moves up, but then they throw in an extra week of Christmas break and a bunch of teacher workdays, so by the time May rolls around they haven’t actually gotten any more instruction.
There’s not a fixed number of 5s to be awarded, so your kid isn’t competing.
And there’s nothing stopping your kid from picking up a prep book two (or even three!) weeks before school starts.
You are wrong. The teacher and AP tutor both confirmed that there can only be so many 5s and it is curved if too many get a score that translates to a 5.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With a kid taking AP tests next week competing for 5s with kids who had 2-3 more weeks on instruction, I understand the benefit of starting earlier. HOWEVER, we need to get out earlier, too. It’s infuriating that they keep shrinking summer.
+1. Why do we do this to our kids? I'm amazed more parents don't care about this. My guess is they have 2nd graders now and don't get it yet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With a kid taking AP tests next week competing for 5s with kids who had 2-3 more weeks on instruction, I understand the benefit of starting earlier. HOWEVER, we need to get out earlier, too. It’s infuriating that they keep shrinking summer.
AP students represent a fraction of the student population, so I don’t think it makes sense to dictate the schedule according to their needs.
Plus, our start date moves up, but then they throw in an extra week of Christmas break and a bunch of teacher workdays, so by the time May rolls around they haven’t actually gotten any more instruction.
There’s not a fixed number of 5s to be awarded, so your kid isn’t competing.
And there’s nothing stopping your kid from picking up a prep book two (or even three!) weeks before school starts.
Anonymous wrote:In my experience, APS doesn't teach anything in June, so we may as well end in May if we are starting mid-August. But my kid is a senior, so I can no longer get myself to care deeply about this stuff. Basically, though, they will not be learning anything as far as I can tell from here on out. Exams next week, then teachers are literally just filling time until the end of the year, which is a complete waste.
In contrast, my kid in Catholic school has exams literally on the last day of school, so will be learning right up until the end.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With a kid taking AP tests next week competing for 5s with kids who had 2-3 more weeks on instruction, I understand the benefit of starting earlier. HOWEVER, we need to get out earlier, too. It’s infuriating that they keep shrinking summer.
AP students represent a fraction of the student population, so I don’t think it makes sense to dictate the schedule according to their needs.
Plus, our start date moves up, but then they throw in an extra week of Christmas break and a bunch of teacher workdays, so by the time May rolls around they haven’t actually gotten any more instruction.
There’s not a fixed number of 5s to be awarded, so your kid isn’t competing.
And there’s nothing stopping your kid from picking up a prep book two (or even three!) weeks before school starts.
Anonymous wrote:With a kid taking AP tests next week competing for 5s with kids who had 2-3 more weeks on instruction, I understand the benefit of starting earlier. HOWEVER, we need to get out earlier, too. It’s infuriating that they keep shrinking summer.