Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It amazes me how the left is working so hard to get rid of one of the justices they don't agree with so they can have another stab at putting another Justice on the bench.
Stacking the court didn't work out for them..... time to try a new tactic.
Go after Kavanaugh. FAIL (even an attempted assasination)
Turn to ACB. NO GO
Go after Thomas. DIDN'T WORK
Turn to Gorsuch.
And, work on Roberts at the same time.
Looks like it's Alito's turn next.
That’s adorable that you want to pretend that Bretty was subject to an assassination attempt.
The only reason that Kavanaugh and Thomas sit on the court is because the GOP is amoral and entirely without ethics. ACB wasn’t fit, Gorsuch, Roberts and Alito all lied. But make no mistake that if the GOP was a functioning party, Kavanaugh and Thomas would be out on their rears.
Anonymous wrote:It amazes me how the left is working so hard to get rid of one of the justices they don't agree with so they can have another stab at putting another Justice on the bench.
Stacking the court didn't work out for them..... time to try a new tactic.
Go after Kavanaugh. FAIL (even an attempted assasination)
Turn to ACB. NO GO
Go after Thomas. DIDN'T WORK
Turn to Gorsuch.
And, work on Roberts at the same time.
Looks like it's Alito's turn next.
Anonymous wrote:It amazes me how the left is working so hard to get rid of one of the justices they don't agree with so they can have another stab at putting another Justice on the bench.
Stacking the court didn't work out for them..... time to try a new tactic.
Go after Kavanaugh. FAIL (even an attempted assasination)
Turn to ACB. NO GO
Go after Thomas. DIDN'T WORK
Turn to Gorsuch.
And, work on Roberts at the same time.
Looks like it's Alito's turn next.
Anonymous wrote:We’ve all become numb to GOP corruption.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the deal with Roberts’ 2000 adoption of Irish twins (literally), at a time when international adoption of them was illegal?
Get real. While I generally do not agree with Justice Roberts' legal opinions and perspectives, I certainly consider his adoption of 2 children a good thing. No doubt, those children are lucky to have the Roberts as parents.
I agree plus not sure what PP is referring to as international
Adoptions were not only legal but relatively common
U.S. parents adopted one foreign-born child for every 200 births in 2000.
https://www.prb.org › resources › i...
International Adoption Rate in U.S. Doubled in the 1990s | PRB
I’m DP and we adopted internationally in 2000. I think 2000 was the pinnacle year of international adoptions in the U.S. I researched extensively back then and you could not adopt from Ireland back then unless the child was a relative. Certainly I’m no expert though. I would have loved to adopt from Ireland as we are 3/4 Irish. There were two Irish families we met in Russia who said it was difficult to impossible for them to adopt there. This is the first I’ve heard about the Robert’s adoption. Sounds fishy but maybe they are biologically related.
I think his land sale is fishy AF. We can’t continue to have ethically compromised people on the Supreme Court.
If you are so desperate to adopt why go overseas whether are thousands of children this country who needs a loving and stable home?
The facts of the Roberts illegal adoption are in a link on page three of this thread.
Anonymous wrote:All nine justices signed, so go after all of ‘em, right
Anonymous wrote:All nine justices signed, so go after all of ‘em, right
Anonymous wrote:There are some unintelligent individuals posting here. An accompanying “Statement on Ethics Principles and Practices” signed by all nine justices suggested a united front on the court, one that’s in favor of continuing to police itself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It amazes me how the left is working so hard to get rid of one of the justices they don't agree with so they can have another stab at putting another Justice on the bench.
Stacking the court didn't work out for them..... time to try a new tactic.
Go after Kavanaugh. FAIL (even an attempted assasination)
Turn to ACB. NO GO
Go after Thomas. DIDN'T WORK
Turn to Gorsuch.
And, work on Roberts at the same time.
Looks like it's Alito's turn next.
They are corrupt hacks. Their opinions are all bullshit, bad law, bad history, bad faith.
We know. We know. Anyone who disagrees with you is a hack. The Constitution be damned!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It amazes me how the left is working so hard to get rid of one of the justices they don't agree with so they can have another stab at putting another Justice on the bench.
Stacking the court didn't work out for them..... time to try a new tactic.
Go after Kavanaugh. FAIL (even an attempted assasination)
Turn to ACB. NO GO
Go after Thomas. DIDN'T WORK
Turn to Gorsuch.
And, work on Roberts at the same time.
Looks like it's Alito's turn next.
They are corrupt hacks. Their opinions are all bullshit, bad law, bad history, bad faith.
Anonymous wrote:It amazes me how the left is working so hard to get rid of one of the justices they don't agree with so they can have another stab at putting another Justice on the bench.
Stacking the court didn't work out for them..... time to try a new tactic.
Go after Kavanaugh. FAIL (even an attempted assasination)
Turn to ACB. NO GO
Go after Thomas. DIDN'T WORK
Turn to Gorsuch.
And, work on Roberts at the same time.
Looks like it's Alito's turn next.