Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apparently a former employee of the bank.
Circumstances don’t matter, though, nothing will change.
Thanks, my initial guess had been a robbery.
The thing about these shootings is that they're all based on emotional and psychological issues.
and all involve guns
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reports of five dead and six injured by a shooter at a bank in Louisville. Maybe red states will start to change their view if more shootings happen in their states? Thoughts and prayers aren’t working, so it’s long past time to try something else.
I’m sorry for the victims and families (unless they’re anti gun control in which case you get what you get.)
How much worse will it get before it gets better? Columbine should have been enough, and definitely Sandy Hook. Maybe it’s time to start posting pictures of the carnage so people will start to understand the damage guns do, especially assault rifles. Nothing else is working.
I think you are misreading the political climate in red states. The answer in most will be to expand conceal carry and limit places that ban conceal carry. Not any other gun control.
Idiocy. More concealed carry DOES NOT reduce crime.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reports of five dead and six injured by a shooter at a bank in Louisville. Maybe red states will start to change their view if more shootings happen in their states? Thoughts and prayers aren’t working, so it’s long past time to try something else.
I’m sorry for the victims and families (unless they’re anti gun control in which case you get what you get.)
How much worse will it get before it gets better? Columbine should have been enough, and definitely Sandy Hook. Maybe it’s time to start posting pictures of the carnage so people will start to understand the damage guns do, especially assault rifles. Nothing else is working.
Red states already have higher rates of gun violence and death: accident, homicide, and suicide. It doesn't matter, for several reasons: feelings about the second amendment, thinking they won't be affected (especially since blue cities in red states have a lot of the homicides and rural white voters distance themselves from that), huge campaign contributions from groups that oppose even very popular and minor changes to gun laws
That is a lot of statements with no support.
And yet, the death rates from firearms in red states are higher (do you dispute that?) and they are not passing laws to change that...if anything, going to more open carry.and easier permits for young adults or no permits required at all. To what do you attribute that?
I question everything when not supported.
California has had 25 mass shooting since 1982 - the most of any state. Last I checked it was not a red state.
Umm,,,for 24 of those 40 years CA had a Republican for governor
Anonymous wrote:They will ignore this latest mass shooting... UNLESS they discover the shooter was LGBT or something...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Gov Beshear (a democrat) said he has a good friend who is one of the victims.
Sadly, I fear that will make the Rs in KY even more resolute to not let this change anything.
+1
But it doesn’t matter. Governor Lee’s wife had a friend who was killed in the Nashville shooting. Rep. Scalise almost died. They still don’t care.
It’s not about caring or not caring.
Yes we clearly need to enact more bans on access to guns and step up other protocols for identifying individuals who might be a risk.
But to get rid of guns all together isn’t going to happen.
Besides the 2nd amendment which other amendment are you ok with getting rid of?
Because that’s really the heart of the issue.
Neither political party is willing to alter an amendment bc once you start then it it’s a slippery slope.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They will ignore this latest mass shooting... UNLESS they discover the shooter was LGBT or something...
What a weird take. People are dead, families will never again see loved ones and you think this is a time to grandstand about.... gay people. Are you trying to live up to the stereotype?
What kind of mind game/gaslighting are you playing here? The right typically ignores these shootings, screams not to politicize them etc. But one trans person is the vile shooter, and they couldn't shut the eff up about it.
Different poster, btw.
Different poster too. You too don't get it. STFU and let people grieve before you use their loved one's death for yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They will ignore this latest mass shooting... UNLESS they discover the shooter was LGBT or something...
What a weird take. People are dead, families will never again see loved ones and you think this is a time to grandstand about.... gay people. Are you trying to live up to the stereotype?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The shooter is dead too
The shooter always dies. It's become normalized. "I have big feelings. I'll go get a gun that I can buy very easily and shoot people, then myself, and/or get shot in the process." How does this help
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reports of five dead and six injured by a shooter at a bank in Louisville. Maybe red states will start to change their view if more shootings happen in their states? Thoughts and prayers aren’t working, so it’s long past time to try something else.
I’m sorry for the victims and families (unless they’re anti gun control in which case you get what you get.)
How much worse will it get before it gets better? Columbine should have been enough, and definitely Sandy Hook. Maybe it’s time to start posting pictures of the carnage so people will start to understand the damage guns do, especially assault rifles. Nothing else is working.
I think you are misreading the political climate in red states. The answer in most will be to expand conceal carry and limit places that ban conceal carry. Not any other gun control.