Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:without grades, does everyone end up at the same place? If everyone is decidedly the same academically, at least on paper, then with limited resources, how do determine who gets what for things like colleges?
How do you determine who is actually proficient and what proficient even is if you are not evaluating the performance of large groups? Or are you grading, but just not assigning the grades to the individual and only using them for internal reference?
I don’t think proficiency is a relevant metric here anymore.
Anonymous wrote:The premise of this thread carries no weight. There is no data to support this notion. It's just the wish of one poster who probably also dreams of a past that never was...
Anonymous wrote:without grades, does everyone end up at the same place? If everyone is decidedly the same academically, at least on paper, then with limited resources, how do determine who gets what for things like colleges?
How do you determine who is actually proficient and what proficient even is if you are not evaluating the performance of large groups? Or are you grading, but just not assigning the grades to the individual and only using them for internal reference?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is the complete opposite of what I learned while getting my MEd.
You learned kids shouldn’t be graded hard?
You would be shocked at how many teachers think grades should be eliminated all together...
If there was adequate time to write narratives for every student then eliminating grades would be very worthy of exploration.
But that's a fantasy! So grades are needed, for better or worse.
-teacher
Anonymous wrote:The world has changed since our day.
Grades are inflated.
Parents attack regularly and severely.
As a HS teacher, I rarely give lower grades anymore. It isn't worth it for the salary I make.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand how there can be “easy” or “tough” grading in math. Isn’t there only one right answer? Grading writing can be much more subjective, I know that, even with rubrics. But what is a “tough” grader in math doing differently?
Easier: Partial credit when a child does some steps of a multi-step algorithm correctly.
Tougher: No re-takes, no extra credit, no partial credit. Particular rules about how work must be shown or how answers are displayed (boxing answers, including units where appropriate).
Anonymous wrote:OP your comments about private schools grading being tough are interesting. My DC is at a top ivy after MCPS. DC says that tons of kids there are from private schools, and they struggle with science. They write very well though. Public schools might grade easier but somehow they push the kids in science more. Maybe public schools entice their students to study sciences because of easier grading?
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand how there can be “easy” or “tough” grading in math. Isn’t there only one right answer? Grading writing can be much more subjective, I know that, even with rubrics. But what is a “tough” grader in math doing differently?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m the PP who posted about having learned the opposite while in grad school. I actually do not believe in grading at all, and much prefer students and families having an awareness of what they know and what they’re ready to learn next. My program was not a traditional education program, and I’m very happy with the philosophy I learned, I also agree that in order to be a good teacher, you need actual in classroom experience. I didn’t get my masters until I had been teaching for many years, and it only helped solidify my understanding of what I already suspected.
This is a nightmare approach to teaching. How do you assess what the kids have learned? How do you ensure that they work to the standards they need to learn?
I’m confused by your confusion. You observe, you ask questions, you have students work on assignments, projects, etc. just like they regularly would. You compare their work and answers to what the standard says to see if they are proficient. It’s really simple. You just don’t need to give a participation grade, homework grade, or give things a letter or percentage grade. Standards-based/proficiency/narrative grading is quite common.
so you still grade them but it’s just pass-fail?