Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You don’t sound very familiar with A meet at a dual meet format. Do you have a HS or college swimmer (I do and I was one- which means I’m also very familiar with club meets). So A meats run one heat of boys and one heat of girls. If you mix genders you have two heats 3 scoring entries per team per event. A trans girl swimmer would have to fill a male slot in the entries and then you could race them based on time, the fastest heat would usually be all the boys and the first heat girls (but you’d have a few exceptions especially at teams without a lot of year round swimmers)
This isn’t rocket science. Enter the kids and their seed times. Run the mixed gender/age heats. Calculate the scores at the end depending on time. The times supercede the order of heat finishes. Accept thanks from parents for a shortened meet.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t really see a problem with letting swimmers wear whatever bathing suit they want, but having them swim in the category of their genetic sex. It is the most fair option given the choices that we have.
Anonymous wrote:
My biological son now is identifying as female (16). My husband and I are divorced and my child can choose between Colonial league (my husband's pool) or NVSL (through me) since my child splits their time. How is this handled with the various leagues? What are the policies? And can anyone point me to the regs?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In our league, the child can swim in their chosen (for lack of a better word) gender's events, but will be scored in their biological gender's events. So your trans daughter could swim with the girls but will appear on the meet results as a boy.
Which league?
Does that work both ways? Could my trans son win events they didn't swim in? That seems really awkward.
I don't think trans men have an advantage over biological men.
Anonymous wrote:You don’t sound very familiar with A meet at a dual meet format. Do you have a HS or college swimmer (I do and I was one- which means I’m also very familiar with club meets). So A meats run one heat of boys and one heat of girls. If you mix genders you have two heats 3 scoring entries per team per event. A trans girl swimmer would have to fill a male slot in the entries and then you could race them based on time, the fastest heat would usually be all the boys and the first heat girls (but you’d have a few exceptions especially at teams without a lot of year round swimmers)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In our league, the child can swim in their chosen (for lack of a better word) gender's events, but will be scored in their biological gender's events. So your trans daughter could swim with the girls but will appear on the meet results as a boy.
Which league?
Does that work both ways? Could my trans son win events they didn't swim in? That seems really awkward.
I don't think trans men have an advantage over biological men.
You are missing the point. PP is pointing out the odd result of winning without head-to-head racing. It is a bit of an issue as a lot of the older kids can moderate their effort to maximize points based on who’s in the pool with them. A 16 yr old who can easily get second in backstroke but has no chance of winning May conserve energy for their next race. Having someone swimming with the other gender but scoring with yours will throw a wrinkle in this. May be the best outcome, but it is worth considering.
Everything seems strange until it isn’t. This happens all the time in some official USA swimming club meets, as a pp has said. The results are reported broken out by age and gender, but the heats are run together. Swimmers learn to swim their own race, knowing that their competitors might not be in the same heat. Yes, a swimmer can win an event and not have gone head to head with the second place swimmer. This happens pretty often in the younger age groups and less often in the older ones. I’ve never heard anyone comment or complain about this, not even the kids.
I think that rec swimmers and their parents get more enjoyment and pleasure from winning a heat than club swimmers and their parents, who see most meets as a way to get times to qualify for bigger meets down the line. This isn’t a criticism of rec swimming - their meets serve a different purpose than club meets, so it makes sense that having a traditional heat format and winner is more important to them. Swimmers in club meets never “moderate their efforts” unless they are swimming a prelim/final format, because they care about their times much more than points. I would consider it a minor issue that is less important than trimming the timeline so that the meet is a reasonable length, or allowing swimmers to swim with their gender identity.
The comments above are I in response to the suggestion that trans kids swim with one gender and be scored with another, not the blended heats idea. And I’m not thinking of heat winners at B meets but the single heat at A meets where all swimmers are traditionally swimming against each other, can see the competition, and points are on the line that dictate the outcome of the meet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In our league, the child can swim in their chosen (for lack of a better word) gender's events, but will be scored in their biological gender's events. So your trans daughter could swim with the girls but will appear on the meet results as a boy.
Which league?
Does that work both ways? Could my trans son win events they didn't swim in? That seems really awkward.
I don't think trans men have an advantage over biological men.
You are missing the point. PP is pointing out the odd result of winning without head-to-head racing. It is a bit of an issue as a lot of the older kids can moderate their effort to maximize points based on who’s in the pool with them. A 16 yr old who can easily get second in backstroke but has no chance of winning May conserve energy for their next race. Having someone swimming with the other gender but scoring with yours will throw a wrinkle in this. May be the best outcome, but it is worth considering.
Everything seems strange until it isn’t. This happens all the time in some official USA swimming club meets, as a pp has said. The results are reported broken out by age and gender, but the heats are run together. Swimmers learn to swim their own race, knowing that their competitors might not be in the same heat. Yes, a swimmer can win an event and not have gone head to head with the second place swimmer. This happens pretty often in the younger age groups and less often in the older ones. I’ve never heard anyone comment or complain about this, not even the kids.
I think that rec swimmers and their parents get more enjoyment and pleasure from winning a heat than club swimmers and their parents, who see most meets as a way to get times to qualify for bigger meets down the line. This isn’t a criticism of rec swimming - their meets serve a different purpose than club meets, so it makes sense that having a traditional heat format and winner is more important to them. Swimmers in club meets never “moderate their efforts” unless they are swimming a prelim/final format, because they care about their times much more than points. I would consider it a minor issue that is less important than trimming the timeline so that the meet is a reasonable length, or allowing swimmers to swim with their gender identity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In our league, the child can swim in their chosen (for lack of a better word) gender's events, but will be scored in their biological gender's events. So your trans daughter could swim with the girls but will appear on the meet results as a boy.
Which league?
Does that work both ways? Could my trans son win events they didn't swim in? That seems really awkward.
I don't think trans men have an advantage over biological men.
You are missing the point. PP is pointing out the odd result of winning without head-to-head racing. It is a bit of an issue as a lot of the older kids can moderate their effort to maximize points based on who’s in the pool with them. A 16 yr old who can easily get second in backstroke but has no chance of winning May conserve energy for their next race. Having someone swimming with the other gender but scoring with yours will throw a wrinkle in this. May be the best outcome, but it is worth considering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In our league, the child can swim in their chosen (for lack of a better word) gender's events, but will be scored in their biological gender's events. So your trans daughter could swim with the girls but will appear on the meet results as a boy.
Which league?
Does that work both ways? Could my trans son win events they didn't swim in? That seems really awkward.
I don't think trans men have an advantage over biological men.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In our league, the child can swim in their chosen (for lack of a better word) gender's events, but will be scored in their biological gender's events. So your trans daughter could swim with the girls but will appear on the meet results as a boy.
How does that work? For a race, each team gets three lane. A swimmer whose swim wasn't being scored would mean the team is forfeiting that lane. It also seems unfair to score them against a heat they aren't in because racers look to the side to pace themselves
That's a good point.
And this is why we need to have honest and respectful conversation about how when we open things up to trans female, we MAY be displacing biological females. And we need to ask ourselves if thats ok.
That's not to demonize the trans community or suggest that they shouldn't be their authentic selves. But also that their decisions and actions dont happen in a vacuum.
In this scenario, I think the athlete should swim with their biological peers
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In our league, the child can swim in their chosen (for lack of a better word) gender's events, but will be scored in their biological gender's events. So your trans daughter could swim with the girls but will appear on the meet results as a boy.
Which league?
Does that work both ways? Could my trans son win events they didn't swim in? That seems really awkward.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In our league, the child can swim in their chosen (for lack of a better word) gender's events, but will be scored in their biological gender's events. So your trans daughter could swim with the girls but will appear on the meet results as a boy.
This is probably the fairest approach
The fairest approach would be to have them swim in their own category for Trans girls.
The heart of this debate is whether to prioritize validating gender identity or fairness in sports. Fairness is undoubtably the priority when people suggest an open category or a trans male to female category, but not a separate trans female to male category. No one is concerned about a trans male outclassing XY males, so no one argues that they shouldn’t compete with them. Then there is a practicality issue. There are probably not enough trans girls to compete against each other - is she supposed to swim by herself in every event?
If respecting gender identity was the priority, I think trans girls who transition after puberty should compete as girls. But if fairness in sport is the priority, then it should be an open category. Sports should state (and admit) that their categories of male and female are not gender identity categories, but whether development was testosterone influenced or not. That’s what people should care about if the priority is fairness - did this kid develop muscle strength, ability to gain muscle with resistance training, bone growth, etc with testosterone or not? Obviously there are many nuanced cases that are not black and white under this umbrella, so the answer is not that simple.