Anonymous wrote:Regardless of accuracy, it’s self-important, which is yawn-inducing.
Anonymous wrote:I wanted to enjoy Les Miserables but the musical didn’t depict the Paris Uprising accurately, so it was trash.
/s
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is surely one of the most accurate musicals based on real events ever. I mean it’s incredibly faithful to the research for a freaking musical. I understand not liking it, but this complaint is really really REALLY stupid.
Let's not get carried away...
Anonymous wrote:This is surely one of the most accurate musicals based on real events ever. I mean it’s incredibly faithful to the research for a freaking musical. I understand not liking it, but this complaint is really really REALLY stupid.
Anonymous wrote:This is crazy. I am going to see Parade next weekend. I am sure it is not 100% historically accurate either (although it is sadly still relevant). It is art. A lot of musicals are based on other things (I once heard Sondheim say that is because a musical involves so much collaboration between person doing the book and the person doing the music/lyrics so it is easier if they have a common point of reference).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids love Hamilton and it has actually been a great way for us to learn. Knowing that many aspects of the musical were inaccurate or sensationalized for the purpose of entertainment made me get a bunch of books that we could read together about Hamilton’s life, the founding fathers etc. I also got books about life for regular people/kids during the early days of America, which were super interesting for them. Now my kids (5 and 7) point out the inaccuracies when we listen to the songs or watch clips. The musical set in motion a great journey of learning for us. I realized I find the debates the founding fathers had super interesting, and I’ve been able to share what I’ve learned with my kids and explain how we are still debating things like state’s rights vs power of fed govt. We have also made family trips to Mt Vernon, Monticello etc. I can’t imagine that they would have had such a sustained interest in these topics and history without the songs, etc.
Lol I am sure your kids are really absorbing all of this at ages 5 anf 7.
Anonymous wrote:Why lie though? It's common knowledge some of this stuff and easily researched.
Don't call it Hamilton then, just some historicalally inaccurate musical.
I enjoy lots of fiction but the way some people cling to this as educational is crazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're talking about the hit musical?
What a piece of trash.
Jelly much? LMM is laughing all the way to the bank...
Oh I'm sure. He's very talented. Just because I don't like this particular work, doesn't mean I don't admire the many talents that combine to create it.
Anonymous wrote:The muSic is headache inducing. Have no clue why people liked this musical at all.