Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:51     Subject: Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
Anonymous wrote:If you think liberals look down on MAGA, wait until you hear how Fox News talks about you guys.🤭

Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:50     Subject: Re:Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
Anonymous wrote:The stereotypes and bigotry in this thread are quite something.

Imagine if someone has started a thread wondering if blacks who descended from slaves were more "fill in the blank" than blacks that immigrated.

It would be shut down in a hot second.


OK, PP, fine. Where do you stand on the Cuban Adjustment Act? Be honest.
Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:49     Subject: Re:Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
The stereotypes and bigotry in this thread are quite something.

Imagine if someone has started a thread wondering if blacks who descended from slaves were more "fill in the blank" than blacks that immigrated.

It would be shut down in a hot second.
Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:46     Subject: Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
If you think liberals look down on MAGA, wait until you hear how Fox News talks about you guys.🤭
Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:44     Subject: Re:Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
Yes, The Cuban Adjustment Act was wonderful. Beautiful in so many ways.

Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:42     Subject: Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
Anonymous wrote:Yes. I live in Upstate NY and the Republican Party is dominated by Italian-Americans. Honestly it’s just pure racism.


This and it is growing all over NY.

What religion are they predominately?
Same as SCOTUS

Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:40     Subject: Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is a super interesting and legit question in the culture bucket

Now imagine asking it about some non white group



All the blacks, etc. in the DAR and on the Mayflower?


No, don’t be dense, I mean about the various cultural subcategories of blacks, Latinos, etc


People talk about that all the time -- Latinos growing more conservative, etc.


I’m talking about subcategories. There are, as I’m sure you know, many different groups called “Latino.” Different occupational patterns, countries of origin, recency of immigration, on and on.


Most people are smart enough to break away Cuban immigrants and their descendants because the experience is vastly different thanks the the Cuban adjustment act.
Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:30     Subject: Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is a super interesting and legit question in the culture bucket

Now imagine asking it about some non white group



All the blacks, etc. in the DAR and on the Mayflower?


No, don’t be dense, I mean about the various cultural subcategories of blacks, Latinos, etc


People talk about that all the time -- Latinos growing more conservative, etc.


I’m talking about subcategories. There are, as I’m sure you know, many different groups called “Latino.” Different occupational patterns, countries of origin, recency of immigration, on and on.

People talk about Latino subcategories too. Quite famously Americans of Cuban descent who vote differently from other Latinos from other countries.
Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:28     Subject: Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is a super interesting and legit question in the culture bucket

Now imagine asking it about some non white group



All the blacks, etc. in the DAR and on the Mayflower?


No, don’t be dense, I mean about the various cultural subcategories of blacks, Latinos, etc


People talk about that all the time -- Latinos growing more conservative, etc.


I’m talking about subcategories. There are, as I’m sure you know, many different groups called “Latino.” Different occupational patterns, countries of origin, recency of immigration, on and on.


Right, and people sometimes discuss things like that. Keep on keepin on, MAGA-face! Somebody's takin' somethin' from ya!
Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:22     Subject: Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is a super interesting and legit question in the culture bucket

Now imagine asking it about some non white group



All the blacks, etc. in the DAR and on the Mayflower?


No, don’t be dense, I mean about the various cultural subcategories of blacks, Latinos, etc


People talk about that all the time -- Latinos growing more conservative, etc.


I’m talking about subcategories. There are, as I’m sure you know, many different groups called “Latino.” Different occupational patterns, countries of origin, recency of immigration, on and on.
Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:20     Subject: Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Within the white population has anyone else noticed that white-ethnics (Italians, polish, Eastern Euro, Irish) seem to be have a higher incidence of maga than mayflower whites/dar eligible types.

Thoughts? Isn’t this the exact opposite of 20-30 years ago?



Very, very, very, very few Mayflower/DAR eligible types are MAGA. They don't have to be.

MAGA is (mostly) for angry, lower middle class white men (not that there's anything wrong with any of those categorizations) who are convinced someone's "taking" something from them.


And that's exactly what the GOP has tapped into and promoted - that the "other" is responsible for their miserable lives.


Which is justified.



The “other” is corporate greed, not someone working two jobs to keep a roof over their head.


Bingo.
Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:19     Subject: Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is a super interesting and legit question in the culture bucket

Now imagine asking it about some non white group



All the blacks, etc. in the DAR and on the Mayflower?


No, don’t be dense, I mean about the various cultural subcategories of blacks, Latinos, etc


People talk about that all the time -- Latinos growing more conservative, etc.
Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:18     Subject: Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
Asians too
Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:15     Subject: Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is a super interesting and legit question in the culture bucket

Now imagine asking it about some non white group



All the blacks, etc. in the DAR and on the Mayflower?


No, don’t be dense, I mean about the various cultural subcategories of blacks, Latinos, etc
Anonymous
Post 03/14/2023 16:13     Subject: Anyone else notice that “white ethnics” are more maga than DAR/mayflower/wasp types?
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Within the white population has anyone else noticed that white-ethnics (Italians, polish, Eastern Euro, Irish) seem to be have a higher incidence of maga than mayflower whites/dar eligible types.

Thoughts? Isn’t this the exact opposite of 20-30 years ago?



Very, very, very, very few Mayflower/DAR eligible types are MAGA. They don't have to be.

MAGA is (mostly) for angry, lower middle class white men (not that there's anything wrong with any of those categorizations) who are convinced someone's "taking" something from them.


And that's exactly what the GOP has tapped into and promoted - that the "other" is responsible for their miserable lives.


Which is justified.



The “other” is corporate greed, not someone working two jobs to keep a roof over their head.