Anonymous wrote:This is all about exposing the security apparatus in the US Capitol to our adversaries. Those of you getting upset about this need to remember, Kevin MCCarthy ONLY gave this footage to Tucker Carlson, not to all media outlets writ large.
And, Tucker Carlson, like other Fox "News" hosts, are entertainment and not news. They all admitted they KNEW the election was fair and they KNEW what they were doing in terms of suggesting the insurrection was legitimate.
And yet, here you are believing them and their on camera persona and not the texts disclosed in court where they were literally laughing at how stupid and gullible their viewers were (and apparently, are)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, Sicknick's family is suing Trump for $10million. Of course, they don't want to see tape that does not support this suit.
There are, um, a lot of tapes. If there was a film of Lee Harvey Owsald easing an omelette in the morning before going to the book repository, would that be an exoneration? Because that is what Tucker, and by transitive property, you, are arguing.
Good. The tapes have been released. January 6 committee only showed part ot the story--and, I agree, that story is bad. But, they didn't have to lie. And, they did about Sicknick.
Certainly, there were many bad actors that day on January 6 who deserved to be punished. They could have told that story without the lies.
Anonymous wrote:You know, Alex Jones just found out what happens when you f*ck around with victims’ families. Maybe Tucker will find out too. Fox needs to fire him.
Anonymous wrote:
This goes against the family's "story."
The video suggests their story is wrong.
The autopsy also says that their story is wrong.
It is human nature to want to blame someone else. I have compassion for the family, but,they have also been lied to. How many times have people on the Jan 6 committee said that Sicknick was killed that day?
The committee should have been honest about this. The White House should have been honest about this.
This makes me doubt EVERYTHING the committee did. Especially, since it was reported within days that Sicknick did not die that day.
Did the event contribute to his death? Maybe. Maybe not. But the story coming from the White House and the committee was unequivocal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, Sicknick's family is suing Trump for $10million. Of course, they don't want to see tape that does not support this suit.
There are, um, a lot of tapes. If there was a film of Lee Harvey Owsald easing an omelette in the morning before going to the book repository, would that be an exoneration? Because that is what Tucker, and by transitive property, you, are arguing.
Good. The tapes have been released. January 6 committee only showed part ot the story--and, I agree, that story is bad. But, they didn't have to lie. And, they did about Sicknick.
Certainly, there were many bad actors that day on January 6 who deserved to be punished. They could have told that story without the lies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, Sicknick's family is suing Trump for $10million. Of course, they don't want to see tape that does not support this suit.
There are, um, a lot of tapes. If there was a film of Lee Harvey Owsald easing an omelette in the morning before going to the book repository, would that be an exoneration? Because that is what Tucker, and by transitive property, you, are arguing.
Good. The tapes have been released. January 6 committee only showed part ot the story--and, I agree, that story is bad. But, they didn't have to lie. And, they did about Sicknick.
Certainly, there were many bad actors that day on January 6 who deserved to be punished. They could have told that story without the lies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also, Sicknick's family is suing Trump for $10million. Of course, they don't want to see tape that does not support this suit.
There are, um, a lot of tapes. If there was a film of Lee Harvey Owsald easing an omelette in the morning before going to the book repository, would that be an exoneration? Because that is what Tucker, and by transitive property, you, are arguing.
Anonymous wrote:
This goes against the family's "story."
The video suggests their story is wrong.
The autopsy also says that their story is wrong.
It is human nature to want to blame someone else. I have compassion for the family, but,they have also been lied to. How many times have people on the Jan 6 committee said that Sicknick was killed that day?
The committee should have been honest about this. The White House should have been honest about this.
This makes me doubt EVERYTHING the committee did. Especially, since it was reported within days that Sicknick did not die that day.
Did the event contribute to his death? Maybe. Maybe not. But the story coming from the White House and the committee was unequivocal.
Anonymous wrote:Also, Sicknick's family is suing Trump for $10million. Of course, they don't want to see tape that does not support this suit.
Anonymous wrote:
This goes against the family's "story."
The video suggests their story is wrong.
The autopsy also says that their story is wrong.
It is human nature to want to blame someone else. I have compassion for the family, but,they have also been lied to. How many times have people on the Jan 6 committee said that Sicknick was killed that day?
The committee should have been honest about this. The White House should have been honest about this.
This makes me doubt EVERYTHING the committee did. Especially, since it was reported within days that Sicknick did not die that day.
Did the event contribute to his death? Maybe. Maybe not. But the story coming from the White House and the committee was unequivocal.