Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cool. You have a choice. Go elsewhere.
Says someone who lives somewhere with pharmacy choices...
Anonymous wrote:I'm fine with 1 in 50 women dying over their choice to have ectopic pregnancies. If you don't want to deal with that possibility, don't get pregnant. I don't care if you have children that already exist. Also don't get raped and don't have a miscarriage. How hard it that?
Anonymous wrote:The CA thing is quite funny. How many Wallgreens have had to close there already because of out-of-control crime?
I guess neither criminals nor DAs thought much about helping women safely access pills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cool. You have a choice. Go elsewhere.
Says someone who lives somewhere with pharmacy choices...
Anonymous wrote:Cool. You have a choice. Go elsewhere.
Anonymous wrote:How do I switch my prescriptions from one pharmacy chain to another?
Anonymous wrote:How do I switch my prescriptions from one pharmacy chain to another?
Anonymous wrote:How do I switch my prescriptions from one pharmacy chain to another?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They caved to threats of lawsuits from the forced birthers.
I have moved our prescriptions and they will not see a dime from us anymore.
https://www.npr.org/2023/03/04/1161143595/walgreens-abortion-pill-mifepristone-republican-threat-legal-action
Walgreens won't distribute abortion pills in states where Republican officials have threatened legal action — including some places where abortion is still legal and available
The proper response would be for blue states to allow consumers to sue large pharmacies who don’t carry it. Make the damages statutory large and include attorney fees
On what legal grounds?
Pharmacies in states are subject to the laws of those states. It's the same justification for conservative states forcing them no not carry certain medications
DOJ debunked the GOP-AG interpretation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They caved to threats of lawsuits from the forced birthers.
I have moved our prescriptions and they will not see a dime from us anymore.
https://www.npr.org/2023/03/04/1161143595/walgreens-abortion-pill-mifepristone-republican-threat-legal-action
Walgreens won't distribute abortion pills in states where Republican officials have threatened legal action — including some places where abortion is still legal and available
The proper response would be for blue states to allow consumers to sue large pharmacies who don’t carry it. Make the damages statutory large and include attorney fees
On what legal grounds?
Pharmacies in states are subject to the laws of those states. It's the same justification for conservative states forcing them no not carry certain medications
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They caved to threats of lawsuits from the forced birthers.
I have moved our prescriptions and they will not see a dime from us anymore.
https://www.npr.org/2023/03/04/1161143595/walgreens-abortion-pill-mifepristone-republican-threat-legal-action
Walgreens won't distribute abortion pills in states where Republican officials have threatened legal action — including some places where abortion is still legal and available
The proper response would be for blue states to allow consumers to sue large pharmacies who don’t carry it. Make the damages statutory large and include attorney fees
On what legal grounds?