Anonymous wrote:In short, legacy really varies from school to school.
For athletic recruits (meaning the coach wants to give you a slot), there are academic standards, but they are lower than what it take to get into the lottery for these schools. Cousin was recruited for HYPS, had choice for her sport (and older sibling was recruited athlete at HYPS and at H at the time). Decided not to play sport in fall of senior year. Had to resit for SATs to get a competitive score for an unhooked applicant. Rejected/waitlisted at HYPS but in at one non-ivy top ten.
The options are completely different when you are at that level athletically. That said, not that many kids are that good athletically. Just being an athlete without that level is just another EC.
Anonymous wrote:In short, legacy really varies from school to school.
For athletic recruits (meaning the coach wants to give you a slot), there are academic standards, but they are lower than what it take to get into the lottery for these schools. Cousin was recruited for HYPS, had choice for her sport (and older sibling was recruited athlete at HYPS and at H at the time). Decided not to play sport in fall of senior year. Had to resit for SATs to get a competitive score for an unhooked applicant. Rejected/waitlisted at HYPS but in at one non-ivy top ten.
The options are completely different when you are at that level athletically. That said, not that many kids are that good athletically. Just being an athlete without that level is just another EC.
Anonymous wrote:I know they are different, but wondering how much legacy (one parent, not both) or athletic recruit status helps.
Anonymous wrote:At most schools:
Run-of-the-mill legacy? Little/no impact.
Famous/big donor? More impact.
Recruited athlete (like can make a difference in a sport they care about rather than just make team): Definite impact.
"Recruited athlete": (like maybe on the coach's radar and might be able to walk-on?): Variable impact, often minimal. Get in then the coach will perk up...
Anonymous wrote:Athletic recruit status is great. If you can get your kid in the top 1% (Stanford, Duke, NW, Gtown, Vandy for many sports) or 1-3% (Ivy League) athletically while still maintaining great grades, you should do it! Even top 3-5% or even 6% combined with a stronger minimum academic profile might get help at the best D3 schools (like MIT, Williams, Chicago, Swarthmore, Amherst, Hopkins, and WashU). The top academic D3 schools are also among the very best athletically (except CalTech), so you'd need your kid to be at the high end of the D3 pool as an athlete to get any admissions bump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What type of school? Ivy has something called the Ivy index. You must get those grades to be admitted but you must be a top 1% athlete.
NO .. top 1% athletes go to big sports schools - seriously