Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The short answer to your question is 50+ years of poor urban planning and car-centric design. In most cases, the decision to make things unwalkable was very much on purpose. We've (mostly) realized the error of that approach by now, but walkable spaces are now pretty scarce outside of pre-WWII neighborhoods, and they're enough in demand that they go for a large price premium even though walkability doesn't really cost more to build.
We're starting to retrofit walkable infrastructure into suburban neighborhoods, but it'll take decades, and we're limited with what can be done within the constraints of many of the choices that are already baked in.
Ding ding ding. Basically op, it’s literally illegal to build walkable neighborhoods in most of America. That’s the reason AU Park is so absurdly expensive
I'm sorry... ILLEGAL??
Please cite your sources or explain.
Yes, literally illegal. do you understand that land use regulations and zoning codes exist?
Clarify how zoning makes it illegal to build walkable neighborhoods.
Because you aren't allowed to build commercial/retail developments in neighborhoods that are zoned residential
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The short answer to your question is 50+ years of poor urban planning and car-centric design. In most cases, the decision to make things unwalkable was very much on purpose. We've (mostly) realized the error of that approach by now, but walkable spaces are now pretty scarce outside of pre-WWII neighborhoods, and they're enough in demand that they go for a large price premium even though walkability doesn't really cost more to build.
We're starting to retrofit walkable infrastructure into suburban neighborhoods, but it'll take decades, and we're limited with what can be done within the constraints of many of the choices that are already baked in.
Ding ding ding. Basically op, it’s literally illegal to build walkable neighborhoods in most of America. That’s the reason AU Park is so absurdly expensive
I'm sorry... ILLEGAL??
Please cite your sources or explain.
Yes, literally illegal. do you understand that land use regulations and zoning codes exist?
Clarify how zoning makes it illegal to build walkable neighborhoods.
Anonymous wrote:Much of the area zoned to Murch is walkable to stores and all three schools! But agree this is super hard to find.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because schools are big. ES have 500+ kids instead of small ones. And it only gets bigger from there.
+1
Everything is on a massive scale.
Yes. And even if you do find something walkable it's very rare to be walkable to ES and MS and HS.
My kids had a bus to ES but are walkable to MS and HS and I really appreciate that. ES kids still need parents to take them to/from school so the walkability is of limited value IMO. But the independence for teens in getting to/from school has been great.
??? My children walked/biked/scooted/took the bus to their ES school starting in 1st grade. Can't imagine taking them to school through ES if it was walkable...
My kids took the bus but I didn't know a single child who walked to ES without a parent before 4th or 5th grade. I agree that kids should be able to get to school on their own but, at least in our area, it is not at all socially acceptable to allow a k-3rd grader to walk to school unattended.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The short answer to your question is 50+ years of poor urban planning and car-centric design. In most cases, the decision to make things unwalkable was very much on purpose. We've (mostly) realized the error of that approach by now, but walkable spaces are now pretty scarce outside of pre-WWII neighborhoods, and they're enough in demand that they go for a large price premium even though walkability doesn't really cost more to build.
We're starting to retrofit walkable infrastructure into suburban neighborhoods, but it'll take decades, and we're limited with what can be done within the constraints of many of the choices that are already baked in.
Ding ding ding. Basically op, it’s literally illegal to build walkable neighborhoods in most of America. That’s the reason AU Park is so absurdly expensive
I'm sorry... ILLEGAL??
Please cite your sources or explain.
Yes, literally illegal. do you understand that land use regulations and zoning codes exist?
Clarify how zoning makes it illegal to build walkable neighborhoods.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because schools are big. ES have 500+ kids instead of small ones. And it only gets bigger from there.
+1
Everything is on a massive scale.
Yes. And even if you do find something walkable it's very rare to be walkable to ES and MS and HS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We live in an "undesirable " neighborhood in S. Arlington. We can walk to ES and Shirlington (so restaurants, groceries ans the movie theater). We can bike to the MS ans HS easily (and could wall if we weren't always rushed lol).
We also often go fishing in the stream near us. But again "undesirable " neighborhood.
South Arlington looks so drab and poor and run down.
Murch Elementary in NW DC.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Much of the area zoned to Murch is walkable to stores and all three schools! But agree this is super hard to find.
Zoned to where?