Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s easier to be rich in the south: low taxes and $1 million buys you a giant, nice house instead of a 2 bedroom $hitshack. But money doesn’t matter as much as who you’re related to.
Yeah, that’s the catch. You can’t buy your way into these circles. It matters which high school you went to, who your dad is, which country club your family belongs to.
Fascinating, isn't it? There are places like this all over the country. And DC is full of people who didn't fit in where they grew up, so they came here to start over.
I feel like you’ve never walked the halls of the Capitol and seen the interns and young staffers there. Or been in any Republican administration.
If you really knew any Hill staff you’d know that the real trust fund babies are on the D side. And non-profits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also those are not the 'truly affluent'.
+1 can you imagine the ‘truly affluent’ sending their kid to Alabama. Op, the ‘truly affluent’ have very likely never been within 1,000 miles of Alabama
The E coast lives in such a bubble. Yes, people in the south have money. Lots of it. And kids of high millionaires and billionaires go to schools across the south, UT, LSU, Ole Miss, SMU, and even Alabama.
I don’t think that you know what you’re talking about, PP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not really understanding the definition of "truly affluent".
If you look at where the children of the Top 100 richest American families attend, it is certainly clustered in Top 20 colleges. More so among the families where the person actually was the one to get themselves into the Top 100 (think Bill Gates or Stephen Schwartzman from Blackstone) vs. people in this group that inherited the wealth (think of the Waltons from Wal Mart).
I guess I just don't understand the premise.
I think she just means families with net worth in high millions (100+) as opposed to only 10M or so as we see often here.
There are more families like that than just the household names that you mentioned
Anonymous wrote:I hope my kids don’t end up in college with any of you crazy peoples’ anxiety ridden kids. If that means they end up in Alabama, so be it.
Anonymous wrote:Not really understanding the definition of "truly affluent".
If you look at where the children of the Top 100 richest American families attend, it is certainly clustered in Top 20 colleges. More so among the families where the person actually was the one to get themselves into the Top 100 (think Bill Gates or Stephen Schwartzman from Blackstone) vs. people in this group that inherited the wealth (think of the Waltons from Wal Mart).
I guess I just don't understand the premise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s easier to be rich in the south: low taxes and $1 million buys you a giant, nice house instead of a 2 bedroom $hitshack. But money doesn’t matter as much as who you’re related to.
Yeah, that’s the catch. You can’t buy your way into these circles. It matters which high school you went to, who your dad is, which country club your family belongs to.
Fascinating, isn't it? There are places like this all over the country. And DC is full of people who didn't fit in where they grew up, so they came here to start over.
Dude, if you think DC doesn’t have generational wealth, you’re clearly not in those circles. DC is not the land of kids without family connections picking themselves up by their bootstraps. The very notion is hilarious
And you could go to any major city in the US to find professionals who aren’t uber wealthy making it. In fact, it’s arguably easier to go from nothing to something in LCOL markets. That’s not DC
DC is absolutely more meritocratic than places where the interviewer was your high school bully or where you’re the only person of your race or ethnicity.
You need to get out of your bubble. Tx, eg, has 30 million people. You don’t run into your HS bully places. It also is a minority majority state — which means white are in the minority.
The problem w DC is the arrogance, and how little you know about the rest of the country. GET.OUT.MORE
Absolutely. I was in Dallas recently, and the most striking thing was how diverse the people around me were. Black, Hispanic, White, Asian…. Whether it was a hip, expensive restaurant or a diner. The population of DC is “diverse” but they don’t live together the way they do in large Texas cities. People are working and getting ahead and going out and having fun.
And perhaps the only place in the US that has more “nepo babies” than DC is Hollywood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Also those are not the 'truly affluent'.
+1 can you imagine the ‘truly affluent’ sending their kid to Alabama. Op, the ‘truly affluent’ have very likely never been within 1,000 miles of Alabama
The E coast lives in such a bubble. Yes, people in the south have money. Lots of it. And kids of high millionaires and billionaires go to schools across the south, UT, LSU, Ole Miss, SMU, and even Alabama.
I don’t think that you know what you’re talking about, PP
+1. I briefly attended a SEC school and lots of kids came from old money. They all had their little network from either attending some elite (to them) southern private HS or a public school in a "rich" neighborhood and were in the "top" sororities/fraternities together. They dated and hooked up within that network and were generally gorgeous.