Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most places.
+1. Especially if you are full pay.
Tulane, Wake Forest, SMU, Bucknell, U Miami, Syracuse
Wake Forest doesn’t belong in this group, their acceptance rate is going to be around 15 percent this year.
Then neither does Tulane, which had a 9% admit rate last year.
That’s because Tulane took all but 100 kids through ED and EA. ED acceptance rate is probably over 50%. RD was under 1%. They are totally gaming the system to look more selective. Even worse than Northeastern.
Northeastern is definitely more selective than WF
Anonymous wrote:Mine has a 3.6 gpa, from northern virginia public school. Most kids from their high school got deferred to JMU.
Anonymous wrote:OP,
You'll have to be much clearer on why taking a gap year and re-applying would make your kid a stronger candidate. He would need to do something extraordinary during his gap year, and you know how likely that is? Chances are pretty much zero.
I didn't catch whether he's admitted to safeties. He needs to go to his favorite safety.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most places.
+1. Especially if you are full pay.
Tulane, Wake Forest, SMU, Bucknell, U Miami, Syracuse
Wake Forest doesn’t belong in this group, their acceptance rate is going to be around 15 percent this year.
Then neither does Tulane, which had a 9% admit rate last year.
That’s because Tulane took all but 100 kids through ED and EA. ED acceptance rate is probably over 50%. RD was under 1%. They are totally gaming the system to look more selective. Even worse than Northeastern.
Northeastern is definitely more selective than WF
Troll
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most places.
+1. Especially if you are full pay.
Tulane, Wake Forest, SMU, Bucknell, U Miami, Syracuse
Wake Forest doesn’t belong in this group, their acceptance rate is going to be around 15 percent this year.
Then neither does Tulane, which had a 9% admit rate last year.
That’s because Tulane took all but 100 kids through ED and EA. ED acceptance rate is probably over 50%. RD was under 1%. They are totally gaming the system to look more selective. Even worse than Northeastern.
Northeastern is definitely more selective than WF
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most places.
+1. Especially if you are full pay.
Tulane, Wake Forest, SMU, Bucknell, U Miami, Syracuse
Wake Forest doesn’t belong in this group, their acceptance rate is going to be around 15 percent this year.
Then neither does Tulane, which had a 9% admit rate last year.
That’s because Tulane took all but 100 kids through ED and EA. ED acceptance rate is probably over 50%. RD was under 1%. They are totally gaming the system to look more selective. Even worse than Northeastern.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most places.
+1. Especially if you are full pay.
Tulane, Wake Forest, SMU, Bucknell, U Miami, Syracuse
Wake Forest doesn’t belong in this group, their acceptance rate is going to be around 15 percent this year.
Then neither does Tulane, which had a 9% admit rate last year.
Except at our school, kids with B+ averages get into Tulane but not Wake.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most places.
Exactly.
George Mason, Holy Cross, Providence, Pitt, Skidmore, UNH, UVM, Syracuse, American, IU, Bentley, Babson, URI, Elon, Lafayette, SMU, College of Charleston, Fordham, Connecticut College.
Anonymous wrote:After a heartbreaking rejection from a school thought to be a close match, and where DS was a double legacy, it’s become clear that DS needs to reconsider his options. Maybe take a gap year and reapply next year.
Where are the A-/B+ students applying? Good kids with good stats, but not the brainiacs?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most places.
+1. Especially if you are full pay.
Tulane, Wake Forest, SMU, Bucknell, U Miami, Syracuse
Wake Forest doesn’t belong in this group, their acceptance rate is going to be around 15 percent this year.
Then neither does Tulane, which had a 9% admit rate last year.
Except at our school, kids with B+ averages get into Tulane but not Wake.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My B+ student (3.7 UW/4.0 W) was accepted at UMW, CNU, SMCM, Mount Holyoke, Juniata
3.7 UW is literally an A- Not exactly a B+ student!
Oh come on! That could only come from someone grade-obsessed. Like they are miles apart![]()
Disagree. A B+ is a 3.3. In terms of college admissions, a 3.3 and a 3.7 are indeed miles apart.
Saying her B+ student was admitted to Mt Holyoke is disingenuous and misleading. Others who have kids with true B+ averages might misunderstand their kids’ likelihood of admission to various schools. Overshooting with no true safeties is a major problem right now.
Agree that 3.3 and 3.7 are not the same, but MH is an easier admit than you realize, too. Much easier than the other 7 sisters.
None of them are particularly hard to get into other than Barnard.