Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing that a lot of responders are painting a broad brush of what Q is. You can question government decisions, cats doubt on media reporting and not be q.

No. We know the difference.

DP.

It seems like many of the responders are super paranoid about some minuscule fringe group out there.

It’s like some of the moms I know, who are terrified a cult will kidnap their daughter when she goes off to college.

I see it differently. It’s pretty obvious, for instance, the vaccines are not doing the job people were told they’d do, and that they have affected the menstrual systems and caused damage in young males (especially), and that people were lied to about both those things. That’s been documented in the Pfizer papers. People who believed full-on (i.e. didn’t have a healthy dose of skepticism) now feel kind of foolish, so the mind finds a way to protect itself, and part of that is the absolute arrogance you see in this thread.

That's not my experience. I dont ever discuss vaccines IRL because to this day, if you say things like "the vaccine doesnt prevent transmission" or "masks are marginally effective, if at all" then you are an evil anti-vaxxer. The science never really mattered, the dogma on [yes BOTH SIDES] dominates thinking on the issue.

You get that reaction because you are speaking flat out lies. You are spreading anti vax misinformation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing that a lot of responders are painting a broad brush of what Q is. You can question government decisions, cats doubt on media reporting and not be q.

No. We know the difference.

DP.

It seems like many of the responders are super paranoid about some minuscule fringe group out there.

It’s like some of the moms I know, who are terrified a cult will kidnap their daughter when she goes off to college.

I see it differently. It’s pretty obvious, for instance, the vaccines are not doing the job people were told they’d do, and that they have affected the menstrual systems and caused damage in young males (especially), and that people were lied to about both those things. That’s been documented in the Pfizer papers. People who believed full-on (i.e. didn’t have a healthy dose of skepticism) now feel kind of foolish, so the mind finds a way to protect itself, and part of that is the absolute arrogance you see in this thread.

No actually the vaccines have been shown overwhelmingly to be safe and effective. Millions of people have received the vaccine. There is no concurrent wave of complications. I really think that you must not understand math very well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing that a lot of responders are painting a broad brush of what Q is. You can question government decisions, cats doubt on media reporting and not be q.

No. We know the difference.

DP.

It seems like many of the responders are super paranoid about some minuscule fringe group out there.

It’s like some of the moms I know, who are terrified a cult will kidnap their daughter when she goes off to college.

I see it differently. It’s pretty obvious, for instance, the vaccines are not doing the job people were told they’d do, and that they have affected the menstrual systems and caused damage in young males (especially), and that people were lied to about both those things. That’s been documented in the Pfizer papers. People who believed full-on (i.e. didn’t have a healthy dose of skepticism) now feel kind of foolish, so the mind finds a way to protect itself, and part of that is the absolute arrogance you see in this thread.

That's not my experience. I dont ever discuss vaccines IRL because to this day, if you say things like "the vaccine doesnt prevent transmission" or "masks are marginally effective, if at all" then you are an evil anti-vaxxer. The science never really mattered, the dogma on [yes BOTH SIDES] dominates thinking on the issue.

You get that reaction because you are speaking flat out lies. You are spreading anti vax misinformation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes. A women with whom I worked closely and really liked and respected. She was always conservative but when covid/quarantine happened something severely changed. She went full on Q. She started going to Trump rallies, posting crazy stuff on social media, was completely convinced about the pedo ring, Biden stole the election, you name it. She also was at the January 6th march but I don’t know if she went inside the Capital. She’s cut ties with everyone who used to know her that doesn’t share her craziness. It’s very sad.

Where is Epstein’s list? I think if they released the names, people would be less, um, paranoid?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing that a lot of responders are painting a broad brush of what Q is. You can question government decisions, cats doubt on media reporting and not be q.

No. We know the difference.

DP.

It seems like many of the responders are super paranoid about some minuscule fringe group out there.

It’s like some of the moms I know, who are terrified a cult will kidnap their daughter when she goes off to college.

I see it differently. It’s pretty obvious, for instance, the vaccines are not doing the job people were told they’d do, and that they have affected the menstrual systems and caused damage in young males (especially), and that people were lied to about both those things. That’s been documented in the Pfizer papers. People who believed full-on (i.e. didn’t have a healthy dose of skepticism) now feel kind of foolish, so the mind finds a way to protect itself, and part of that is the absolute arrogance you see in this thread.

That's not my experience. I dont ever discuss vaccines IRL because to this day, if you say things like "the vaccine doesnt prevent transmission" or "masks are marginally effective, if at all" then you are an evil anti-vaxxer. The science never really mattered, the dogma on [yes BOTH SIDES] dominates thinking on the issue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing that a lot of responders are painting a broad brush of what Q is. You can question government decisions, cats doubt on media reporting and not be q.

No. We know the difference.

DP.

It seems like many of the responders are super paranoid about some minuscule fringe group out there.

It’s like some of the moms I know, who are terrified a cult will kidnap their daughter when she goes off to college.

I see it differently. It’s pretty obvious, for instance, the vaccines are not doing the job people were told they’d do, and that they have affected the menstrual systems and caused damage in young males (especially), and that people were lied to about both those things. That’s been documented in the Pfizer papers. People who believed full-on (i.e. didn’t have a healthy dose of skepticism) now feel kind of foolish, so the mind finds a way to protect itself, and part of that is the absolute arrogance you see in this thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing that a lot of responders are painting a broad brush of what Q is. You can question government decisions, cats doubt on media reporting and not be q.

No. We know the difference.

DP.

It seems like many of the responders are super paranoid about some minuscule fringe group out there.

It’s like some of the moms I know, who are terrified a cult will kidnap their daughter when she goes off to college.

I see it differently. It’s pretty obvious, for instance, the vaccines are not doing the job people were told they’d do, and that they have affected the menstrual systems and caused damage in young males (especially), and that people were lied to about both those things. That’s been documented in the Pfizer papers. People who believed full-on (i.e. didn’t have a healthy dose of skepticism) now feel kind of foolish, so the mind finds a way to protect itself, and part of that is the absolute arrogance you see in this thread.

That's not my experience. I dont ever discuss vaccines IRL because to this day, if you say things like "the vaccine doesnt prevent transmission" or "masks are marginally effective, if at all" then you are an evil anti-vaxxer. The science never really mattered, the dogma on [yes BOTH SIDES] dominates thinking on the issue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In 2020, during covid, I was flipping through shortwave to see if there was any news I could pick up (didn't realize BBC World Service wasn't a thing anymore and most everyone was Internet-based). The only thing I found was weird. Someone was broadcasting on shortwave about secret government facilities with stacks of bodies. At first I thought it was an Orson Wells-type thing like a show. It was clear the guy was reading from a script and trying to act out emotion (from the artificial pauses, etc. to sound broken up about it). But I could see where people who were scared because of covid might think it was real?

huh? There were stacks of bodies and there was nothing secret about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m guessing that a lot of responders are painting a broad brush of what Q is. You can question government decisions, cats doubt on media reporting and not be q.

No. We know the difference.

DP.

It seems like many of the responders are super paranoid about some minuscule fringe group out there.

It’s like some of the moms I know, who are terrified a cult will kidnap their daughter when she goes off to college.

I see it differently. It’s pretty obvious, for instance, the vaccines are not doing the job people were told they’d do, and that they have affected the menstrual systems and caused damage in young males (especially), and that people were lied to about both those things. That’s been documented in the Pfizer papers. People who believed full-on (i.e. didn’t have a healthy dose of skepticism) now feel kind of foolish, so the mind finds a way to protect itself, and part of that is the absolute arrogance you see in this thread.

Anonymous wrote:In 2020, during covid, I was flipping through shortwave to see if there was any news I could pick up (didn't realize BBC World Service wasn't a thing anymore and most everyone was Internet-based). The only thing I found was weird. Someone was broadcasting on shortwave about secret government facilities with stacks of bodies. At first I thought it was an Orson Wells-type thing like a show. It was clear the guy was reading from a script and trying to act out emotion (from the artificial pauses, etc. to sound broken up about it). But I could see where people who were scared because of covid might think it was real?

Anonymous wrote:My aunt who is in her 70s. Has always been a moderate republican/compassionate conservative type. Was raised in a working class family where they were not going to waste money sending a girl to college. Despite not having a degree, she worked her way up to a position in a company that had VP level responsibilities although she never got the compensation a woman with a degree or a man would have gotten. Left an abusive marriage when her kids were young and raised them on her own. My dad (her brother) thinks she developed some psycho/social fixation on Trump that led her to Q. I have not idea-to me it just seems so out of character.