Anonymous wrote:So… seems like every other child applying to college wants to major in computer science. If you have one of these kids, what are their specific reasons for wanting this major? Are all of these kids engaging in computer science activities currently or are they thinking that they will just try it out as a major and see what happens? It seems like the biology major equivalent for all of the premed students.
Anonymous wrote:The only questionable thing about CS majors I've observed in my big tech work over the last few years is that too many people have become so STEM focused in their education that they are not gaining enough of the writing, speaking, or soft skills that are so vital to moving up in a tech company.
The entry and mid-level coding roles are the ones that AI will eventually impact, so developing a wider skillset while you easily can in college is smart to do with that future threat too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s mostly about jobs and money. It’s today’s “engineering.”
Which is the most important factor
Anonymous wrote:It’s mostly about jobs and money. It’s today’s “engineering.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AI has issues with general things. It's been 15 years since the last spewing of AI taking over coding from humans.
Actually if anything AI helps programers from making stupid mistakes but that's it at least for now.
So plenty of CS jobs around.
You clearly haven't been following the latest AI developments. But I agree that for the next few years, CS jobs are safe. Which poses a problem for the kids in undergrad CS right now.
Have you? writing based humanity majors seem to be in great danger on top of already mediocre job prospects
ChatGPT can write very well.
Different person here. Only someone who does not write well would say the ChatGPT writes “very well.” It’s formulaic garbage. I grant you that it will get better, but it’s not replacing a good writer right now.
How is it that DCUM is filled with Shakespeares? There is an OpEd today in the Washington Post today from a philosophy professor at University of Wisconsin:
"This artificial-intelligence tool excels at producing grammatical and even insightful essays — just what we’re hoping to see from our undergraduates. How good is it, really? A friend asked ChatGPT to write an essay about “multiple realization.” This is an important topic in the course I teach on the philosophy of mind, having to do with the possibility that minds might be constructed in ways other than our own brains. The essay ran shorter than the assigned word count, but I would have given it an A grade. Apparently ChatGPT is good enough to create an A-level paper on a topic that’s hardly mainstream."[b]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ours has always been deeply drawn to logic, puzzles, languages, and the creativity and imagination associated with a virtual world, with a healthy dose of math and philosophy. CS is perfect for all of this.
Also, he built his first PC at age 10 and never stopped digging into the world of what the technology side of science can do and may do.
So he's perfect for his field. He will make short work of all the people who pick that major with only superficial exposure and who think they'll have an easy career of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AI has issues with general things. It's been 15 years since the last spewing of AI taking over coding from humans.
Actually if anything AI helps programers from making stupid mistakes but that's it at least for now.
So plenty of CS jobs around.
You clearly haven't been following the latest AI developments. But I agree that for the next few years, CS jobs are safe. Which poses a problem for the kids in undergrad CS right now.
Have you? writing based humanity majors seem to be in great danger on top of already mediocre job prospects
ChatGPT can write very well.
Different person here. Only someone who does not write well would say the ChatGPT writes “very well.” It’s formulaic garbage. I grant you that it will get better, but it’s not replacing a good writer right now.