Anonymous wrote:Anti car people are truly the most insufferable

They sure give vegans a run for their money.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blame the victim mentality.

Absolutely demented, sick logic. Seek help op.

+1. OP probably thinks women don’t need to wear cute outfits, and if they do and get sexually assaulted they shouldn’t complain.

Totally. Don't look like someone who might have a vagina if you don't want to get raped, otherwise, it's on you, and OP has no sympathy.

Car break-ins are increasing in the burbs too, are you going to chastise suburbanites for owning personal vehicles too? Or not being rich enough to afford 3 car garage homes? Here is a solution to crime: stop owning anything If you don't have valuable personal belonging then nobody has anything to steal. What are you going to say next? Don't have a vagina and you won't get raped, right?

Anonymous wrote:Absent physical disabilities, being immunocompromised or living in the farthest corners of the city, you do not need a car here. I’m actually generally of the “tough on crime” variety, but I don’t care about carjackings since there’s no reason to own a car if you live in the city.

You win the Woke-of-the-week Award!!

Contact the Biden WH and they'll give you a good job, probably linked to Public Transpotation.

I know this isn't what this thread is about but it seems clear to me that the rise in carjackings in the city is directly related to the success of anti-theft technology in cars.

I was on a jury for a carjacking where the perpetrators abandoned a stolen older car in order to commit a carjacking so they could have a newer car, with a key. They couldn't steal that car while unoccupied because of anti-theft devices. They were (stupid, dangerous, criminal) kids.

Similarly to how people don't steal phones any more because it's too hard to use them, it seems that someone needs to come up with car technology to make carjacking useless. It would have to happen in a way that doesn't put the driver at risk, and idk what it is. Maybe face ID where new drivers have to go through some registration process OR push an emergency button that would contact law enforcement would work.

An obvious flaw there would be that if the carjacker needs your face to operate the car, they might kidnap you and force you to drive. But I don't think that's what most of the city's carjackers want to do, they just want a car to joyride around in (again not saying that's not incredibly stupid and criminal, it is).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Absent physical disabilities, being immunocompromised or living in the farthest corners of the city, you do not need a car here. I’m actually generally of the “tough on crime” variety, but I don’t care about carjackings since there’s no reason to own a car if you live in the city.

Doesn’t it bother you that carjackers who aren’t physically disabled and don’t live in the farthest corners of the city aren’t taking public transportation? You should show up to their court dates with WMATA maps to teach them the error of their ways.

Actually, this is a good point and another area where our underfunded public schools are expressing a systemic bias.

Narcissism is a hell of a drug.

Anonymous wrote:Absent physical disabilities, being immunocompromised or living in the farthest corners of the city, you do not need a car here. I’m actually generally of the “tough on crime” variety, but I don’t care about carjackings since there’s no reason to own a car if you live in the city.

Doesn’t it bother you that carjackers who aren’t physically disabled and don’t live in the farthest corners of the city aren’t taking public transportation? You should show up to their court dates with WMATA maps to teach them the error of their ways.

Anonymous wrote:Absent physical disabilities, being immunocompromised or living in the farthest corners of the city, you do not need a car here. I’m actually generally of the “tough on crime” variety, but I don’t care about carjackings since there’s no reason to own a car if you live in the city.

Because I like my hybrid car. Appreciate the concern, however.

Anonymous wrote:why do so many people have kids and then complain when someone steals them? I mean JC, if you don't want your children to be abducted, you shouldn't have any!!

+100

Best analogy for this nonsensical thread.

why do so many people have kids and then complain when someone steals them? I mean JC, if you don't want your children to be abducted, you shouldn't have any!!

Who cares if you do or don’t have a car. Car jackings are a sign of societal dysfunction and should not be normalized or thought of as ok.

Should people carrying wallets not be able to complain of robbery and should solution to said robberies be not carrying a wallet?

Also, why do they live in homes and complain about burglars? Why do women have a vagina and complain about being raped?

Why? Why? Why?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blame the victim mentality.

Absolutely demented, sick logic. Seek help op.

+1. OP probably thinks women don’t need to wear cute outfits, and if they do and get sexually assaulted they shouldn’t complain.

PP’s moral compass amounts to: people that I don’t like for any reason I choose deserve to be violently harmed. It’s that simple. It’s the same logic that violent criminals use and you cannot get more sociopathic.

Pp here/- also because of school choice via lottery, very few kids go to school in their neighborhood anymore. Parents need cars to drop off and pick up. My kid will take the bus 40 mins next year to high school. Im very concerned about violence in city buses. Every time Ive ridden one it’s been sketchy as hell, with kids or adults shouting obscenities, mentally ill people going off or uncomfortably staring, etc. the incident where the older woman was beaten up and no one did anything was eye opening. Is that just urban culture? Ps ive lived downtown for 20 years and am not white. Neither was the woman who was pushed.