Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s my understanding it’s breaking records with regard to the sales. Obviously people are very interested.

https://apnews.com/article/prince-harry-book-sales-2853618b7ca1591d67e870171c3aef99

I’m not surprised. It pulls back the curtain and gives us a person look at certain members of the family. They must be beyond pissed 😂

Easy to attack your family when you know they can't fight back. Cowardly.

Have you actually read the book? A basic premise of the book is that members of the family and their aides have been unnamed sources for quite a lot of what gets published in the tabloids. Harry’s stance is that he is openly using the book to tell his own story.
I find this credible, and it suggests that Harry is the one who’s fighting back, while the “sources close to the family” are the ones that I’d regard as being craven. Not that all readers will agree with this take, but if you haven’t actually read the book — vs excerpts from it in the very press that Harry is criticizing — your perception and conclusions may be inaccurately slanted.

Yes, we know. He is saying this in all of his interviews as well as a justification for saying all the things he is saying. My take is that he is paranoid and this paranoia and victim mentality has been exacerbated by his wife. His wife was planting stories from day one, btw.

Anonymous wrote:This thread will be locked up faster than you can say Harry Meghan William Kate Charles Camilla Crazies!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s my understanding it’s breaking records with regard to the sales. Obviously people are very interested.

https://apnews.com/article/prince-harry-book-sales-2853618b7ca1591d67e870171c3aef99

I’m not surprised. It pulls back the curtain and gives us a person look at certain members of the family. They must be beyond pissed 😂

Easy to attack your family when you know they can't fight back. Cowardly.

Have you actually read the book? A basic premise of the book is that members of the family and their aides have been unnamed sources for quite a lot of what gets published in the tabloids. Harry’s stance is that he is openly using the book to tell his own story.
I find this credible, and it suggests that Harry is the one who’s fighting back, while the “sources close to the family” are the ones that I’d regard as being craven. Not that all readers will agree with this take, but if you haven’t actually read the book — vs excerpts from it in the very press that Harry is criticizing — your perception and conclusions may be inaccurately slanted.

Yes, we know. He is saying this in all of his interviews as well as a justification for saying all the things he is saying. My take is that he is paranoid and this paranoia and victim mentality has been exacerbated by his wife. His wife was planting stories from day one, btw.

Anonymous wrote:I’m still in Harry’s army service kart if the book, but it’s sooooooo boring.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is such a whining attention seeker

I want to hear more about his todger!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s my understanding it’s breaking records with regard to the sales. Obviously people are very interested.

https://apnews.com/article/prince-harry-book-sales-2853618b7ca1591d67e870171c3aef99

I’m not surprised. It pulls back the curtain and gives us a person look at certain members of the family. They must be beyond pissed 😂

Easy to attack your family when you know they can't fight back. Cowardly.

Have you actually read the book? A basic premise of the book is that members of the family and their aides have been unnamed sources for quite a lot of what gets published in the tabloids. Harry’s stance is that he is openly using the book to tell his own story.
I find this credible, and it suggests that Harry is the one who’s fighting back, while the “sources close to the family” are the ones that I’d regard as being craven. Not that all readers will agree with this take, but if you haven’t actually read the book — vs excerpts from it in the very press that Harry is criticizing — your perception and conclusions may be inaccurately slanted.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s a well-written book that offers a nicely detailed perspective on someone who has been featured in —and exploited by — the press since birth. It’s good to hear something of the reality that’s behind the public processions and decades of magazine covers. As an American, I have little sense of the deeper meanings of having a monarchy — let alone being born into one, so that’s of general interest. More to my taste, though, are the reflections of someone with a very strange life, replete with trauma and everything from opulence to neglect — who finds reasons to grow and change. There’s history, glimpses of some of the truths beyond the fairy tale surface, psychological struggles and insights, and exploration of bigger issues such as military service, and, importantly, the powers of a noxious press. Something for almost every reader.

The biggest surprises for me were the powers behind the throne— the grey men who both influence and serve as doorkeepers to the royal family (especially the press); and the realization that Camilla — whose ever-present influences molded what Diana’s marriage and family could become — has been in bed with the press since before Harry was born, and continues to aid and abet quite noxious stuff.

It’s a good read.

This is a great summary. Not sure that I agree that it showed Camilla has been in bed with the press since before Harry was born. She was widely hated for many years and then waged a successful PR campaign in her own favor by throwing Harry and others under the bus.

Oops. You’re right. I worded that poorly. Spare doesn’t suggest that Camilla has been in bed with the press since before Harry was born, although other articles that I’ve read recently — in the wake of the Jeremy Clarkson muck — do strongly support that. My takeaway is that Camilla consorted with members of the press, who released noxious articles about Diana, then, decades later, with even firmer relationships, used the same strategies to attempt to defame Harry and Meghan. I read Spare with this influence in mind, at least as a possibility.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I listened to the audio and loved it.

I have a lot of empathy for his journey. It was easy to listen to and gave you his side of the past 25 years.

Except, would've gone mad if I had to hear him say "Not Cot" one more time! -NP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s my understanding it’s breaking records with regard to the sales. Obviously people are very interested.

https://apnews.com/article/prince-harry-book-sales-2853618b7ca1591d67e870171c3aef99

I’m not surprised. It pulls back the curtain and gives us a person look at certain members of the family. They must be beyond pissed 😂

Easy to attack your family when you know they can't fight back. Cowardly.

Have you actually read the book? A basic premise of the book is that members of the family and their aides have been unnamed sources for quite a lot of what gets published in the tabloids. Harry’s stance is that he is openly using the book to tell his own story.
I find this credible, and it suggests that Harry is the one who’s fighting back, while the “sources close to the family” are the ones that I’d regard as being craven. Not that all readers will agree with this take, but if you haven’t actually read the book — vs excerpts from it in the very press that Harry is criticizing — your perception and conclusions may be inaccurately slanted.

Anonymous wrote:I’m still in Harry’s army service kart if the book, but it’s sooooooo boring.