Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fortunately, this is my last year with FCPS... and I hear ya, OP.
I have a kid who loved Math and was good at Math... but then in Algebra, they used some math program where he had to type in answers rather than write them out.
The program supposedly "walks" you through.
All it did was kill my kid's motivation and waste his time.
He could have completed a worksheet in 20 less than minutes but it took 40 minutes to type numbers into the program.
If he can do a worksheet that fast, he's needs are not being met. That's what technology does, meets the kids at their level and moves them. It's adaptive curriculum. He should be challenged
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate computer programs. I want textbooks and homework on paper.
Amen, I don’t know when textbooks were phased out but every year I am disappointed there are none.
I’d say it was mostly in the mid to late 90s. We had a social studies text when I taught 4th grade (I think they still do). I remember a math text through most of the 90s. Other than those I don’t remember textbooks during my teaching career that started 30 years ago.
Do we need to discuss why textbooks are not relevant? Really? Do you think schools could use a set of encyclopedias?![]()
PP here.
I didn’t say textbooks are needed. How did you get that? I only shared when I remember last having them. I answered the OP’s question, so stop with the eye rolls.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Ok, everyone, put down your phones right now. No screen use of any kind for a week. Nada..nothing, no phone, no tablets, no desktops, nothing.
Then come back here, OK?
So funny how everyone on a screen today decries the use of screens.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teacher here...
The term is gamification, and yes it is way more effective than drill sheets. But while we are at it, renember when you took home your textbook with whatever assignment and tried to do the work, but didn't get it? Online programs walk the learner through concept, stops them if the answer is wrong, reviews errors, provides more practice. The book does nothing. Books? Exoensuve and outdated. Online materials is current,dynamic, and effective.
OP needs to understand learning and basic pedagogical practice. And stop with the handwriting stuff. No one is required to hand letter anything at all. We literally do not even have to sign a document anymore.
Is gamification an effect or a cause of the lack of attention span in kids today? And is gamification more "effective" than drill sheets? Kids don't remember anything nowadays (it's well studied that people retain less information from a screen than from a book and that writing by hand is better for retention than listening or reading or clicking).
I understand that screens, including Lexia and ST Math, are needed for classroom management. Because kids cannot sit quietly when they're finished with their work. Because kids cannot behave anymore. But that doesn't mean that it's good.
There are new studies showing that screens delay and reduce emotional regulation and maturity. No kidding. Kids look regulated while they're zoned out staring at a screen. But then every moment when they're not staring at a screen they're dysregulated.
Did you mean " affect" or "effect?"
No, gamification increases motivation because it replaces rote out of context drill. There's no instrinsic motivation for drill.
Mentioning studies about retention of information is useless without sources. Would you be more inclined to remember concepts in or out of a context? Screens have nothing to do with it. No, we don't need to write everything down by hand. That is ludicrous.
No one is dysregulated due to screen use. Most of us use screens, but we also eat, cook, clean, drive, play games and sports, socialize, interact, build, create, enjoy, listen, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Ok, everyone, put down your phones right now. No screen use of any kind for a week. Nada..nothing, no phone, no tablets, no desktops, nothing.
Then come back here, OK?
So funny how everyone on a screen today decries the use of screens.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Google and Apple and Microsoft have huge nonprofit budgets to push technology in schools. That's where it started.
Ah, no. We buy what we want to do the job. Good grief.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate computer programs. I want textbooks and homework on paper.
Amen, I don’t know when textbooks were phased out but every year I am disappointed there are none.
I’d say it was mostly in the mid to late 90s. We had a social studies text when I taught 4th grade (I think they still do). I remember a math text through most of the 90s. Other than those I don’t remember textbooks during my teaching career that started 30 years ago.
Do we need to discuss why textbooks are not relevant? Really? Do you think schools could use a set of encyclopedias?![]()
PP here.
I didn’t say textbooks are needed. How did you get that? I only shared when I remember last having them. I answered the OP’s question, so stop with the eye rolls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Teacher here...
The term is gamification, and yes it is way more effective than drill sheets. But while we are at it, renember when you took home your textbook with whatever assignment and tried to do the work, but didn't get it? Online programs walk the learner through concept, stops them if the answer is wrong, reviews errors, provides more practice. The book does nothing. Books? Exoensuve and outdated. Online materials is current,dynamic, and effective.
OP needs to understand learning and basic pedagogical practice. And stop with the handwriting stuff. No one is required to hand letter anything at all. We literally do not even have to sign a document anymore.
Is gamification an effect or a cause of the lack of attention span in kids today? And is gamification more "effective" than drill sheets? Kids don't remember anything nowadays (it's well studied that people retain less information from a screen than from a book and that writing by hand is better for retention than listening or reading or clicking).
I understand that screens, including Lexia and ST Math, are needed for classroom management. Because kids cannot sit quietly when they're finished with their work. Because kids cannot behave anymore. But that doesn't mean that it's good.
There are new studies showing that screens delay and reduce emotional regulation and maturity. No kidding. Kids look regulated while they're zoned out staring at a screen. But then every moment when they're not staring at a screen they're dysregulated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate computer programs. I want textbooks and homework on paper.
Amen, I don’t know when textbooks were phased out but every year I am disappointed there are none.
I’d say it was mostly in the mid to late 90s. We had a social studies text when I taught 4th grade (I think they still do). I remember a math text through most of the 90s. Other than those I don’t remember textbooks during my teaching career that started 30 years ago.
Do we need to discuss why textbooks are not relevant? Really? Do you think schools could use a set of encyclopedias?![]()
Anonymous wrote:Fortunately, this is my last year with FCPS... and I hear ya, OP.
I have a kid who loved Math and was good at Math... but then in Algebra, they used some math program where he had to type in answers rather than write them out.
The program supposedly "walks" you through.
All it did was kill my kid's motivation and waste his time.