Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would need to see the exact curriculum to know how to feel about this.

Nowadays, a lot of gender ideology and other white liberal priorities are snuck in using black history as a smokescreen. There’s a lot of forced teaming of blacks with random ideologies we didn’t come up with and people who had nothing to do with our struggle. There’s also a tendency to portray blackness as negative and wholly characterized by suffering at the hands of whites — all under the guise of “sympathizing” with us. It’s insidious.

So, who knows what was bundled with actual black history in this AP African American history course.

+100

Do you feel it’s your personal duty to review copies of all AP curricula or just this one? Who knows what was snuck in to any of the non-STEM AP class curricula. Why not start with your own child or children’s curricula and work your way up to national-level curricula? Be sure to post a copy of your critiques.

DP. This is a brand new pilot class. Reviewing it is not an unreasonable thing to do.

But random dipshits on Internet forums and racist Governors are not the approving authority for AP course curricula. This a legitimate field of study with established college curricula and requirements that can be adapted into an AP course by professionals who know what they are doing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would need to see the exact curriculum to know how to feel about this.

Nowadays, a lot of gender ideology and other white liberal priorities are snuck in using black history as a smokescreen. There’s a lot of forced teaming of blacks with random ideologies we didn’t come up with and people who had nothing to do with our struggle. There’s also a tendency to portray blackness as negative and wholly characterized by suffering at the hands of whites — all under the guise of “sympathizing” with us. It’s insidious.

So, who knows what was bundled with actual black history in this AP African American history course.

+100

Do you feel it’s your personal duty to review copies of all AP curricula or just this one? Who knows what was snuck in to any of the non-STEM AP class curricula. Why not start with your own child or children’s curricula and work your way up to national-level curricula? Be sure to post a copy of your critiques.

You sound unhinged. You do realize that new AP courses are always reviewed and tweaked before final approval - right? That goes for all the current AP classes. They all went through this process. Get a clue.
DP

They’re not reviewed by governors of states who presumably have more important things to do.

You really think it’s DeSantis who comes off badly when you suggest that state governments shouldn’t make time to examine how the future of this country, children, are being educated?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would need to see the exact curriculum to know how to feel about this.

Nowadays, a lot of gender ideology and other white liberal priorities are snuck in using black history as a smokescreen. There’s a lot of forced teaming of blacks with random ideologies we didn’t come up with and people who had nothing to do with our struggle. There’s also a tendency to portray blackness as negative and wholly characterized by suffering at the hands of whites — all under the guise of “sympathizing” with us. It’s insidious.

So, who knows what was bundled with actual black history in this AP African American history course.

+100

Do you feel it’s your personal duty to review copies of all AP curricula or just this one? Who knows what was snuck in to any of the non-STEM AP class curricula. Why not start with your own child or children’s curricula and work your way up to national-level curricula? Be sure to post a copy of your critiques.

DP. This is a brand new pilot class. Reviewing it is not an unreasonable thing to do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would need to see the exact curriculum to know how to feel about this.

Nowadays, a lot of gender ideology and other white liberal priorities are snuck in using black history as a smokescreen. There’s a lot of forced teaming of blacks with random ideologies we didn’t come up with and people who had nothing to do with our struggle. There’s also a tendency to portray blackness as negative and wholly characterized by suffering at the hands of whites — all under the guise of “sympathizing” with us. It’s insidious.

So, who knows what was bundled with actual black history in this AP African American history course.

+100

Do you feel it’s your personal duty to review copies of all AP curricula or just this one? Who knows what was snuck in to any of the non-STEM AP class curricula. Why not start with your own child or children’s curricula and work your way up to national-level curricula? Be sure to post a copy of your critiques.

You sound unhinged. You do realize that new AP courses are always reviewed and tweaked before final approval - right? That goes for all the current AP classes. They all went through this process. Get a clue.
DP

They’re not reviewed by governors of states who presumably have more important things to do.

Anonymous wrote:Not even dog whistlin’ Dixie anymore

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/19/us/desantis-florida-ap-african-american-studies.amp.html


Those cultural marxists at the College Board!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would need to see the exact curriculum to know how to feel about this.

Nowadays, a lot of gender ideology and other white liberal priorities are snuck in using black history as a smokescreen. There’s a lot of forced teaming of blacks with random ideologies we didn’t come up with and people who had nothing to do with our struggle. There’s also a tendency to portray blackness as negative and wholly characterized by suffering at the hands of whites — all under the guise of “sympathizing” with us. It’s insidious.

So, who knows what was bundled with actual black history in this AP African American history course.

+100

Do you feel it’s your personal duty to review copies of all AP curricula or just this one? Who knows what was snuck in to any of the non-STEM AP class curricula. Why not start with your own child or children’s curricula and work your way up to national-level curricula? Be sure to post a copy of your critiques.

You sound unhinged. You do realize that new AP courses are always reviewed and tweaked before final approval - right? That goes for all the current AP classes. They all went through this process. Get a clue.
DP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would need to see the exact curriculum to know how to feel about this.

Nowadays, a lot of gender ideology and other white liberal priorities are snuck in using black history as a smokescreen. There’s a lot of forced teaming of blacks with random ideologies we didn’t come up with and people who had nothing to do with our struggle. There’s also a tendency to portray blackness as negative and wholly characterized by suffering at the hands of whites — all under the guise of “sympathizing” with us. It’s insidious.

So, who knows what was bundled with actual black history in this AP African American history course.

+100

Do you feel it’s your personal duty to review copies of all AP curricula or just this one? Who knows what was snuck in to any of the non-STEM AP class curricula. Why not start with your own child or children’s curricula and work your way up to national-level curricula? Be sure to post a copy of your critiques.

Anonymous wrote:is there any doubt about who is the "Cancel" party?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would need to see the exact curriculum to know how to feel about this.

Nowadays, a lot of gender ideology and other white liberal priorities are snuck in using black history as a smokescreen. There’s a lot of forced teaming of blacks with random ideologies we didn’t come up with and people who had nothing to do with our struggle. There’s also a tendency to portray blackness as negative and wholly characterized by suffering at the hands of whites — all under the guise of “sympathizing” with us. It’s insidious.

So, who knows what was bundled with actual black history in this AP African American history course.

+100

Do you feel it’s your personal duty to review copies of all AP curricula or just this one? Who knows what was snuck in to any of the non-STEM AP class curricula. Why not start with your own child or children’s curricula and work your way up to national-level curricula? Be sure to post a copy of your critiques.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would need to see the exact curriculum to know how to feel about this.

Nowadays, a lot of gender ideology and other white liberal priorities are snuck in using black history as a smokescreen. There’s a lot of forced teaming of blacks with random ideologies we didn’t come up with and people who had nothing to do with our struggle. There’s also a tendency to portray blackness as negative and wholly characterized by suffering at the hands of whites — all under the guise of “sympathizing” with us. It’s insidious.

So, who knows what was bundled with actual black history in this AP African American history course.

+100

Do you feel it’s your personal duty to review copies of all AP curricula or just this one? Who knows what was snuck in to any of the non-STEM AP class curricula. Why not start with your own child or children’s curricula and work your way up to national-level curricula? Be sure to post a copy of your critiques.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would need to see the exact curriculum to know how to feel about this.

Nowadays, a lot of gender ideology and other white liberal priorities are snuck in using black history as a smokescreen. There’s a lot of forced teaming of blacks with random ideologies we didn’t come up with and people who had nothing to do with our struggle. There’s also a tendency to portray blackness as negative and wholly characterized by suffering at the hands of whites — all under the guise of “sympathizing” with us. It’s insidious.

So, who knows what was bundled with actual black history in this AP African American history course.

+100

Anonymous wrote:I would need to see the exact curriculum to know how to feel about this.

Nowadays, a lot of gender ideology and other white liberal priorities are snuck in using black history as a smokescreen. There’s a lot of forced teaming of blacks with random ideologies we didn’t come up with and people who had nothing to do with our struggle. There’s also a tendency to portray blackness as negative and wholly characterized by suffering at the hands of whites — all under the guise of “sympathizing” with us. It’s insidious.

So, who knows what was bundled with actual black history in this AP African American history course.

Anonymous wrote:Florida is full of backwards hillbillies. Nothing intellectual comes out of Florida. If you are smart and want smart kids, you wouldn’t move to Florida in the first place.

Anonymous wrote:I would need to see the exact curriculum to know how to feel about this.

Nowadays, a lot of gender ideology and other white liberal priorities are snuck in using black history as a smokescreen. There’s a lot of forced teaming of blacks with random ideologies we didn’t come up with and people who had nothing to do with our struggle. There’s also a tendency to portray blackness as negative and wholly characterized by suffering at the hands of whites — all under the guise of “sympathizing” with us. It’s insidious.

So, who knows what was bundled with actual black history in this AP African American history course.