A barrister is who you go to when you spill too-hot coffee in our lap and burn yourself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, what is the difference between JD and ESQ? Same as lawyer and attorney?

JD is a professional degree that's conferred by a law school. Esquire is pretentious, and one should never refer to yourself as esquire.

Esquire is a regional legal term for member of the Bar.

Like any other word denoting something of values, it's only pretentious when used outside of appropriate context. A normal context is to... identify a lawyer in a case where it's not obvious, such as on an office door next to a tailor's shop and a podiatrist's office.

Nobody cares. If you went to law school and didn’t pass the bar, your title is loser.

gauche

Anonymous wrote:So, what is the difference between JD and ESQ? Same as lawyer and attorney?

JD is a professional degree that's conferred by a law school. Esquire is pretentious, and one should never refer to yourself as esquire.

Anonymous wrote:J.D. is for someone who graduated from law school.

Attorney, lawyer, Esquire (no one uses this) are all interchangeable and signify possessing a law license.

Many solo practitioners still do when referring to themselves individually, as opposed to their law firm's name (i.e. John Smith, Esq. vs. John Smith P.A. = Professional Association)

Anonymous wrote:J.D. is for someone who graduated from law school.

Attorney, lawyer, Esquire (no one uses this) are all interchangeable and signify possessing a law license.

I have an acquaintance who uses Esquire - it's on her license plate! But she also manages to insert "I'm a lawyer" into every conversation.

J.D. is for someone who graduated from law school.

Attorney, lawyer, Esquire (no one uses this) are all interchangeable and signify possessing a law license.

This is a stupid thread, and just clickbait for bored lawyers. The “er” in lawyer means (for all intents and purposes) that you can perform the role, just like baker, plumber, bricklayer, stripper, etc. So if you’ve never even been permitted to perform as a lawyer, you’re not a lawyer any more than a former or future stripper is a stripper. You perhaps will be a lawyer (or were a lawyer and are now retired), but if you don’t and can’t do legitimate lawyering you’re not a lawyer in any meaningful sense of the word.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never knew this

A Lawyer is someone who graduated Law School

An Attorney is someone graduated law school and passed the bar exam.

So all Attorneys are lawyers but not all lawyers are Attorneys

It is similar to you are an Accountant if you have an accounting degree but a CPA has an accounting degree plus passed CPA exam

I'm willing to bet that there are several states that view these terms as interchangeable. If you're in one of those states, you'll get in trouble if you call yourself a lawyer without passing the bar.

yep exactly! Good luck using that defense on a UPL claim. I don't think that will be a very successful defense.

I use them interchangeably and I don’t really care if they are different or not.

Anonymous wrote:This is the dumbest thread ever. Why even post this?

+1

And speaking as a lawyer/attorney myself, the fact that there are four pages of responses feeds a LOT of stereotypes about us.

There is no practical difference in 99.99% of the scenarios in which either word would be used.

This reminds me of the heated debates that fed employment lawyers get into about the difference between a probation period and a trial period and a bonus and a performance award.

Big Willy Wonka screaming “you get nothing!” vibes.

Now do “attorney at law” and “attorney in fact”

Rolling my eyes

So, what is the difference between JD and ESQ? Same as lawyer and attorney?