Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:California is growing in antisemitism
Not long ago both senators were Jewish
Now the likes of porter and Lee are disrespecting the last remaining Jewish senator from California by launching preemptive bids to take her seat
To go from two Jewish senators to zero is blatantly antisemitic
Feinstein is 89 years old and has dementia. It's not disrespectful to announce you're running for a seat that will obviously be vacant.
Anonymous wrote:California is growing in antisemitism
Not long ago both senators were Jewish
Now the likes of porter and Lee are disrespecting the last remaining Jewish senator from California by launching preemptive bids to take her seat
To go from two Jewish senators to zero is blatantly antisemitic
Anonymous wrote:California is growing in antisemitism
Not long ago both senators were Jewish
Now the likes of porter and Lee are disrespecting the last remaining Jewish senator from California by launching preemptive bids to take her seat
To go from two Jewish senators to zero is blatantly antisemitic
Katie Porter. You can click to see the earlier quotes.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She has noth9ing to do with the squad other than being a democrat and having a vagina.
This.
WTF, PP?
Again, she votes just like them and she’s a showhorse not a workhorse just like them. She endorsed Nina Turner. Of course she doesn’t advertise being a part of the squad because her district wouldn’t accept it but there’s virtually no difference.
That's a lot of talking points and no real substance. You should have just said "I don't like her" b/c that's all your post amounts to.
Actually I do like her. The whiteboard stuff is informative and helpful. I just think there are a lot of other better more qualified candidates for the Senate from California.
who?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She has noth9ing to do with the squad other than being a democrat and having a vagina.
This.
WTF, PP?
Again, she votes just like them and she’s a showhorse not a workhorse just like them. She endorsed Nina Turner. Of course she doesn’t advertise being a part of the squad because her district wouldn’t accept it but there’s virtually no difference.
That's a lot of talking points and no real substance. You should have just said "I don't like her" b/c that's all your post amounts to.
Actually I do like her. The whiteboard stuff is informative and helpful. I just think there are a lot of other better more qualified candidates for the Senate from California.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She has noth9ing to do with the squad other than being a democrat and having a vagina.
This.
WTF, PP?
Again, she votes just like them and she’s a showhorse not a workhorse just like them. She endorsed Nina Turner. Of course she doesn’t advertise being a part of the squad because her district wouldn’t accept it but there’s virtually no difference.
That's a lot of talking points and no real substance. You should have just said "I don't like her" b/c that's all your post amounts to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She has noth9ing to do with the squad other than being a democrat and having a vagina.
This.
WTF, PP?
Again, she votes just like them and she’s a showhorse not a workhorse just like them. She endorsed Nina Turner. Of course she doesn’t advertise being a part of the squad because her district wouldn’t accept it but there’s virtually no difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She has noth9ing to do with the squad other than being a democrat and having a vagina.
This.
WTF, PP?