Anonymous wrote:It's essentially the Toys R Us of bookstores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really want to support them but when I recently took my daughter there, almost every book she picked was about $5 more in store (prices were ~$13 in store vs $8 on Amazon)…. I just couldn’t justify buying more than a few locally and ordered the rest online. But glad they are having success, reading is great.
I’m the same - I pick up one or two that I want to read immediately, but order the rest online. I do spend quite awhile browsing.
They will price match online prices - worth looking at their online price and asking.
Anonymous wrote:I wish there were more independent bookstores
Anonymous wrote:I really want to support them but when I recently took my daughter there, almost every book she picked was about $5 more in store (prices were ~$13 in store vs $8 on Amazon)…. I just couldn’t justify buying more than a few locally and ordered the rest online. But glad they are having success, reading is great.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really want to support them but when I recently took my daughter there, almost every book she picked was about $5 more in store (prices were ~$13 in store vs $8 on Amazon)…. I just couldn’t justify buying more than a few locally and ordered the rest online. But glad they are having success, reading is great.
It's called inflation. It affects more than just groceries and car prices. You don't have to spend money but it's not unreasonable for books to cost more now than when we were kids.
As for books being cheaper on Amazon, sometimes. That's been the Amazon model for decades - undercut competitors and put them out of business. So supporting predatory pricing is a benefit for you. For a while.
This. Amazon cross-subsidizes some products with profits from other products. That's been disastrous for all bookstores, not just Barnes and Noble. Also, the way cross-subsidizing works is that the it's done to drive competitors out of business and then the cross-subsidizer will raise its prices back up to cover costs again. It's predatory, as pp says.
Amazon was obviously taking notes while Barnes and Nobles used similar practices decades ago — loss leaders until the independent booksellers folded, then most of the discounts disappeared. I lived on the UWS in NYC — and I’m still bitter, even though in other cities the Barnes and Nobles is often the best option.
Anonymous wrote:I hope they will open the traditional stores again. I hate the new minimal design like the one in Rockville because it is soulless like the now-defunct Amazon books.
I spread buying between indy stores, Amazon, and B&N. $ at indy stores helps local economies and authors. Amazon helps more authors because I can buy more books. B&N is important because they carry (or used to) so many specialty books that have trouble getting traction online because you have no way of knowing about them.
IMO they all have different values.