Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's rude to speak in another language in front of someone who can't speak it. I think both airpods or a book are fine. Obviously look around a bit and smile, to let people know you're open to a conversation, but the idea that you must sit quietly, smiling vacantly while all around you people chatter to each other in another language is a ridiculous standard to be held to.
OP says “most of them don’t speak English very well” so by your logic OP is rude by speaking English in front of this group.
But she is the minority here, and they are the majority. It's incumbent upon the majority to be considerate of the minority, not the other way round.
No, it isn’t. I’d love to see you hobble through a conversation with your high school Spanish to accommodate the minority participant in your holiday event. Absolutely an absurd position.
If I had invited someone who didn't speak English to my holiday party, I would absolutely attempt to use my language skills to include them. It might not be pretty, but the onus is on me to make them feel welcome. If you wouldn't, you're a shockingly rude host. Why even invite them otherwise?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's rude to speak in another language in front of someone who can't speak it. I think both airpods or a book are fine. Obviously look around a bit and smile, to let people know you're open to a conversation, but the idea that you must sit quietly, smiling vacantly while all around you people chatter to each other in another language is a ridiculous standard to be held to.
OP says “most of them don’t speak English very well” so by your logic OP is rude by speaking English in front of this group.
But she is the minority here, and they are the majority. It's incumbent upon the majority to be considerate of the minority, not the other way round.
No, it isn’t. I’d love to see you hobble through a conversation with your high school Spanish to accommodate the minority participant in your holiday event. Absolutely an absurd position.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's rude to speak in another language in front of someone who can't speak it. I think both airpods or a book are fine. Obviously look around a bit and smile, to let people know you're open to a conversation, but the idea that you must sit quietly, smiling vacantly while all around you people chatter to each other in another language is a ridiculous standard to be held to.
OP says “most of them don’t speak English very well” so by your logic OP is rude by speaking English in front of this group.
But she is the minority here, and they are the majority. It's incumbent upon the majority to be considerate of the minority, not the other way round.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, rude. Teen should not use them either. You are teaching him to be rude.
So he should sit there for nine hours while rude people rudely converse with each other in a language they know he doesn’t understand? Yeah, no.
OP, screw how long they “expect” you to stay. You’re adults with agency. Stay for dinner +2 hours or so.
Agreed. The family speaking another language and ignoring the OP/inlaw is rude. Is she supposed to sit there for 9 hours while no one talks to her?? WTAF?
OP, my DH and I would be having a conversation. We'd either cut down the hours of the day or he can go early and you follow later. No way I would sit there, on Christmas, for 9 hours in a room full of people who will not talk to me, regardless of how nice they are. It just would not happen.
In the interim, before next year, take some language lessons and your DH should encourage some of his family members to do the same. Part of the obligation, imo, when you marry into a family that has mixed languages/cultures.
Anonymous wrote:This post and some other recent ones make me wonder if it is just DCUM that seems overly invested in "manners" over kindness, or if that's a reflection of how people are in real life.
IMO, real manners are all about kindness, respect, and thoughtfulness and consideration of others. Fake "manners" are adhering to some arbitrary rules of behavior, even if it causes that person great discomfort.
OP putting on airpod could be considered a kindness to his hosts for not spending the full 9 hours trying to accommodate his inability to speak their native tongue. Because if we really want to talk about what is rude and what is not - you might say the in laws are rude for leaving him out of the conversation by carrying on as if he is not there, instead of trying to speak in English in front of him.
But OP, thankfully, is not adhering to some arbitrary rules of manners - and does not consider the in laws' behavior rude.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, rude. Teen should not use them either. You are teaching him to be rude.
So he should sit there for nine hours while rude people rudely converse with each other in a language they know he doesn’t understand? Yeah, no.
OP, screw how long they “expect” you to stay. You’re adults with agency. Stay for dinner +2 hours or so.
Anonymous wrote:I surf the web and read books at my ILs, with their blessing, but I don't block my ears with stuff, in case someone starts a conversation with me. I don't want to be rude.
Sorry, OP, but I think earbuds are not appropriate in this situation. Think of all the thing you could do in the reading department!