Anonymous wrote:I don’t carry one so people are left guessing. 🤣😂
Anonymous wrote:Op here. Thank you all for the diverse opinions and responses. It is truly appreciated. Does anyone have brand preferences based on how brands hold their value?
When I made my first two Celine purchases I was told the brand did not hold value well and ever since then I’ve strayed a bit.
I do like a variety of styles outside of the IYKYK world. I look at bags like Gucci Diana which at the size I like is going for $4800 at the moment and wonder if it would hold value or would be versatile enough or heavyweight enough to be worth it. I’ve heard the bamboo cracks and would the repairs be worth it over all. https://www.gucci.com/us/en/st/capsule/diana-collection
I admit that I do look into an entire purchase because I honestly dislike when things don’t hold up well over time.
Anonymous wrote:Are there any really nice bags that don’t have labels on them? I prefer a really simple look and no label.
Anonymous wrote:Go with Hermes, Chanel, and limited edition LV if you want bags that will hold their value.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's only worth it if you love the bag. I fell in love with Mulberry nearly 15 years ago, before they had as large of a presence and recognizability in the US. I carried my Mulberries and loved them. Still do. They were/are worth the money to me because I love the craftsmanship. They were also "worth it" in the sense that because of the great materials and craftsmanship, they've lasted way longer than any fast fashion bag would have. I carry my bags for me, not so they can be recognized by some stranger.
Look, I like Mulberry fine, but this whole post is so absurd. You think this is an under-the-radar IYKYK brand?! Anyone with any fashion awareness knows the Bayswater is a version of the LV Neverfull “first bag you buy when you can afford a nice bag” bag.
+1. I lived in London and Mulberry is oversaturated. All the 20-something working girl types carry a Bayswater.
Also, Mulberry/Smythson/Aspinal of London are not in the same league as Chanel/Prada/LV. You can get the former for $1-2k, while the latter will run you at least 3k these days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's only worth it if you love the bag. I fell in love with Mulberry nearly 15 years ago, before they had as large of a presence and recognizability in the US. I carried my Mulberries and loved them. Still do. They were/are worth the money to me because I love the craftsmanship. They were also "worth it" in the sense that because of the great materials and craftsmanship, they've lasted way longer than any fast fashion bag would have. I carry my bags for me, not so they can be recognized by some stranger.
Look, I like Mulberry fine, but this whole post is so absurd. You think this is an under-the-radar IYKYK brand?! Anyone with any fashion awareness knows the Bayswater is a version of the LV Neverfull “first bag you buy when you can afford a nice bag” bag.