Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a weird question, to be honest.
I wear yellow, white, and rose gold. I typically mix them.
What is the issue, again?
Rose gold is a whole different ballgame - there is definitely a stereotype around people who wear rose gold. Trend chasers.
Anonymous wrote:This is a weird question, to be honest.
I wear yellow, white, and rose gold. I typically mix them.
What is the issue, again?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like my yellow gold rings from the 80s. At the time, I thought I liked them better. What was I thinking?
Platinum was so big when I got engaged in 1996. I used to wear a lot if silver and white gold with my platinum engagement/wedding bands.
Gold is really in now. I have a lot of gold pieces and I really didn’t like it back in the 90s/early 2000s.
My mom has a wonderful thick/wide gold wedding band. It’s wonderful.
All classes do both if that’s what you are getting at, OP.
There is a guido connotation about men and gold chains and women with huge gold earrings.
OP here - this is kind of what I was getting at. Platinum seemed so dominant with folks in the 90s and 2000s whereas yellow gold seems more vintage
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kind of like how one PP mentioned that a decade ago her small ruby and yellow gold ring wasn’t necessarily cool, I think there is a stereotype of gen X women with platinum engagement rings with large diamonds who were traditionally “cool” or trendy a decade ago. It looks dated now.
I agree with this but it’s only partly about the material/color. That ring from like 2000ish to 2015ish (you know what it looks like) is embarrassing in a way that having a ring that is “off-trend” can’t be. It just marks you as a bandwagoner. Also, the “it” ring from this era is really showy, too, so it sticks out. To me it’s kind of anti-style. It’s like “I I don’t have taste at all, I just saw a ring on tv/in rom coms/in magazine ads/on my friend, and decided that was my dream too.”
Have you seen the current trends? Your post reeks of the trendy “other generations suck” attitude which is naive and immature. I’m guessing you’re not old enough to have friends getting married now. Because as ALWAYS, there are trends. Right now it’s 2-3 carat center stones with a halo on a thin band. The upcoming trend is thick and stacked again like….gasp…the 90s.
And newsflash, a lot of men make this decision on their own. Fewer with each passing decade but yes, they still do. Insulting men who, with great pride and care, picked something for someone they love is an ugly look. Much uglier than following a trend.
What an over dramatic response.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kind of like how one PP mentioned that a decade ago her small ruby and yellow gold ring wasn’t necessarily cool, I think there is a stereotype of gen X women with platinum engagement rings with large diamonds who were traditionally “cool” or trendy a decade ago. It looks dated now.
I agree with this but it’s only partly about the material/color. That ring from like 2000ish to 2015ish (you know what it looks like) is embarrassing in a way that having a ring that is “off-trend” can’t be. It just marks you as a bandwagoner. Also, the “it” ring from this era is really showy, too, so it sticks out. To me it’s kind of anti-style. It’s like “I I don’t have taste at all, I just saw a ring on tv/in rom coms/in magazine ads/on my friend, and decided that was my dream too.”
Have you seen the current trends? Your post reeks of the trendy “other generations suck” attitude which is naive and immature. I’m guessing you’re not old enough to have friends getting married now. Because as ALWAYS, there are trends. Right now it’s 2-3 carat center stones with a halo on a thin band. The upcoming trend is thick and stacked again like….gasp…the 90s.
And newsflash, a lot of men make this decision on their own. Fewer with each passing decade but yes, they still do. Insulting men who, with great pride and care, picked something for someone they love is an ugly look. Much uglier than following a trend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kind of like how one PP mentioned that a decade ago her small ruby and yellow gold ring wasn’t necessarily cool, I think there is a stereotype of gen X women with platinum engagement rings with large diamonds who were traditionally “cool” or trendy a decade ago. It looks dated now.
I agree with this but it’s only partly about the material/color. That ring from like 2000ish to 2015ish (you know what it looks like) is embarrassing in a way that having a ring that is “off-trend” can’t be. It just marks you as a bandwagoner. Also, the “it” ring from this era is really showy, too, so it sticks out. To me it’s kind of anti-style. It’s like “I I don’t have taste at all, I just saw a ring on tv/in rom coms/in magazine ads/on my friend, and decided that was my dream too.”
Anonymous wrote:I’m unaware of any stereotype about this.
Not a stereotype but - growing up in Vancouver there were many recent East Asian immigrants who wore a lot of very yellow gold that l was told was close to 24k. Like they were wearing their wealth. I’ve heard pure gold is very soft it’s better to use up to 18k for making jewelry.
Personally l prefer yellow gold because as others have said, it looks nice with my skin tone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like my yellow gold rings from the 80s. At the time, I thought I liked them better. What was I thinking?
+1
I actually had my platinum wedding rings changed to yellow gold in the 80s because all my other jewelry was gold and I just thought it was "better". Flash forward to about ten years ago when I finally realized how much better I look in cool tones and started buying/wearing silver and platinum. Had to get the rings changed back too.
The finish on yellow gold in the 80s was more yellow and brassy, though. Also, the ring settings would be gaudier, with these big settings with a million prongs.
Now the look is a softer color, not rose gold but less bright yellow, and often done in a matte finish instead of high shine. Ring settings are smaller and sit closer to the rest of the ring. It’s a more understated look.
I have a sapphire ring from the 80s that has sentimental value to me but the yellow gold setting is just garish. I’m having it reset in another yellow gold setting but the look is much more subtle and current.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like my yellow gold rings from the 80s. At the time, I thought I liked them better. What was I thinking?
+1
I actually had my platinum wedding rings changed to yellow gold in the 80s because all my other jewelry was gold and I just thought it was "better". Flash forward to about ten years ago when I finally realized how much better I look in cool tones and started buying/wearing silver and platinum. Had to get the rings changed back too.
Anonymous wrote:Kind of like how one PP mentioned that a decade ago her small ruby and yellow gold ring wasn’t necessarily cool, I think there is a stereotype of gen X women with platinum engagement rings with large diamonds who were traditionally “cool” or trendy a decade ago. It looks dated now.
Anonymous wrote:I don't like my yellow gold rings from the 80s. At the time, I thought I liked them better. What was I thinking?