Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I guess I’m the lone dissenter but I think he sounds like a jerk. My spouse put me on everything even though she made twice as much money as me and would be paying more towards it. We couldn’t get married legally until 2013 ( gay marriage) you need to have a serious conversation with him, if gd won’t get married or put you on the title you need to consider your next steps. Either stay and be ok with it, or leave..
He's a jerk. He should be taking steps to protect the mother of his youngest child and to protect his older children. He should be balancing it out.
You /we don’t know whether he’s a jerk or not. He might have life insurance with the youngest child an/or the OP as a beneficiary.
While he might be a jerk, he also is recognizing that the OP is not in a position to pay the mortgage, taxes, upkeep on the house. Putting the house in her name could well mean that everyone— including the OP and her child — loses out if the OP is unable to handle the bills.
You make it sound like there’s some advantage to OP by not being on the deed. There is literally no advantage. Even if she couldn’t pay the mortgage. None at all.
I think the —possible —advantage is that she’s not responsible for a mortgage and taxes that she can’t afford to pay — and I can imagine some awful scenarios because of that, particularly if there’s little equity in the house or if the mortgage is underwater. She also would — at best — co-own the house with the current owner’s legal heirs. Not only would the house have to be sold, she would be at least partly responsible for any debts associated with the house. So it’s potentially a very messy, very expensive “advantage” that could leave her with no home, significant legal bills, and expenses related to the house that may not have much equity. While there are, of course, other possible scenarios,
If this is wrong — please point out what’s incorrect.
Personally I think she should see a lawyer, who can explain the legal implications of marriage— and the legal implications of not being married in whatever state she lives in. I also think that she should get a job to allow herself some independent options.