Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe they re-elected most of the school board. I pulled my kids from a W feeder elementary because of this indoor recess and screentime BS. I would love to send them back to MCPS, but the system is a mess and the parents are drones trying to pretend everything is okay and get upset and side eye anyone who questions the status quo as if you’re a crazy Republican. It’s horrible! They are destroying an excellent system by ignoring kids basic need to be taught and have recess, not screens all the time.
Anonymous wrote:I love Obama but this is the worst part of his legacy. The idea that technology strengthens the school experience. Even if 10% of the time it is useful, what a huge loss overall. So many missed interpersonal connections, so many missed *neural* connections when paper, pencil and hand are pushed to the side. So much habituation to instant gratification. We are creating a generation of screen addicts with poor eyesight and no patience.
To those of you advocating for a readaloud on screen, do you not get what’s missing? The physical closeness of the teacher surrounded by a semicircle of kids. Getting to know and love your teacher’s reading voice. Kids jockeying to see better, strengthening their negotiating and self advocacy skills—and their eyesight. The reverence for a tangible product rather than a screen. Teacher slowing down to answer questions with no glitches or blue light. Also, kids benefit from repeating the same books and daily chapters from a long book.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love Obama but this is the worst part of his legacy. The idea that technology strengthens the school experience. Even if 10% of the time it is useful, what a huge loss overall. So many missed interpersonal connections, so many missed *neural* connections when paper, pencil and hand are pushed to the side. So much habituation to instant gratification. We are creating a generation of screen addicts with poor eyesight and no patience.
To those of you advocating for a readaloud on screen, do you not get what’s missing? The physical closeness of the teacher surrounded by a semicircle of kids. Getting to know and love your teacher’s reading voice. Kids jockeying to see better, strengthening their negotiating and self advocacy skills—and their eyesight. The reverence for a tangible product rather than a screen. Teacher slowing down to answer questions with no glitches or blue light. Also, kids benefit from repeating the same books and daily chapters from a long book.
Well said.
Especially in the younger grades. Kids in K and 1st grade would be happy to play games or do puzzles or color or play with LEGOs during indoor recess. But it’s easier and quieter to throw on a video, so that’s what happens.
My first grader gets toys every time there's indoor recess, I've never heard her mention a video and she's very excited to tell me about any videos they watch ever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looks like we got a lot of kindergarten experts here! Maybe you should apply to MCPS because you're so knowledgeable!
Believe it or not, many parents are also informed about children and their needs! We watch them the other 70 percent of the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Calling bullsh@! on you being a teacher OP. If you were, you’d know that children are not the most reliable narrators. You’d also know how to go about getting a better sense from the teacher themselves.
All that said, I see teachers relying on videos for read alouds more frequently now than a few years ago. I think part of it is due to resources they developed during virtual instruction and hard copies of books not being available (in classroom/school library) so it’s easier to find a video then look for an alternative title that fits their need.
Again, if you were a classroom teacher I think you’d understand this.
—elementary teacher
This seems like a ridiculous reason/excuse to not read to the kids.
*Sigh*, what is so hard to understand about it? Teachers do read alouds on a daily basis. However,once in awhile, the book is not available to them physically, so on occasion, they will find a Youtube video of someone that is doing a read aloud. THE HORROR.....
So many people here simply choose not to use their brains and instead just decide something is "bad"when they have no idea what they are talking about. It's embarrassing.
It’s not hard to understand, but some people would prefer the teacher just read a physical book. Like, choose a different one.
DP but yep this is the embarrassing part PP was referring to. A different book would not automatically be better because it's not delivered via "screen".
Anonymous wrote:Looks like we got a lot of kindergarten experts here! Maybe you should apply to MCPS because you're so knowledgeable!
Anonymous wrote:This may be a dumb question, but can teachers take books out of the public library? The local ones let you take out dozens and keep them for ages.
I use YouTube readalouds to source and preview new books. But I’m not showing them to my five-year-old. The minimal screen time she gets is for content I can’t deliver some other way—the relaxation of an animated Room on the Broom or an old Mr. Rogers touring a factory.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Calling bullsh@! on you being a teacher OP. If you were, you’d know that children are not the most reliable narrators. You’d also know how to go about getting a better sense from the teacher themselves.
All that said, I see teachers relying on videos for read alouds more frequently now than a few years ago. I think part of it is due to resources they developed during virtual instruction and hard copies of books not being available (in classroom/school library) so it’s easier to find a video then look for an alternative title that fits their need.
Again, if you were a classroom teacher I think you’d understand this.
—elementary teacher
This seems like a ridiculous reason/excuse to not read to the kids.
*Sigh*, what is so hard to understand about it? Teachers do read alouds on a daily basis. However,once in awhile, the book is not available to them physically, so on occasion, they will find a Youtube video of someone that is doing a read aloud. THE HORROR.....
So many people here simply choose not to use their brains and instead just decide something is "bad"when they have no idea what they are talking about. It's embarrassing.
It’s not hard to understand, but some people would prefer the teacher just read a physical book. Like, choose a different one.