Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My jaw just dropped when I read this. I can't believe they're switching again. I'm not an MCPS employee, but I've been a teacher and administrator in other school districts, and curriculum selection is normally a long process (over a year), followed by a 3+ year implementation process, with extensive PD for teachers, as well as training for coaches and admin to monitor implementation and support teachers as needed. How will any schools and teachers, and therefore students (!), ever see success if they don't commit to anything for longer than a couple years??
Yeah originally benchmark and Eureka was supposed to be I think a two or three year adoption and then with the pandemic that was abandoned in everybody had to adopt benchmark right away
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speaking of Benchmark, has anyone been listening to the Sold a Story podcast?
No. What is it about?
It's about how the "newer" reading programs (aka, not phonics) are actively harming kids' ability to learn how to read. Benchmark was mentioned on the most recent episode.
Not the same Benchmark. MCPS a is using Benchmark Advanced. Totally different thing.
Sounds like the podcast findings do apply to Benchmark Advance’s crappy curriculum, though. -DP
Thanks for clarifying. I had assumed it was the same, since MCPS was mentioned in the prior episode.
I think it is the same. Benchmark Advance is often referred to as Benchmark. I don't see a curriculum called Benchmark other than Benchmark Advance.
It is not the same. The podcast is referring to a component of a Fountas and Pinnel tool called Benchmark.
Benchmark Advance is a completely different product that is currently being used as the Reading curriculum in MCPS.
I am a veteran teacher in mcps and just listened to the podcast. It is interesting. I am still processing it but may start a thread to discuss.
Anonymous wrote:My jaw just dropped when I read this. I can't believe they're switching again. I'm not an MCPS employee, but I've been a teacher and administrator in other school districts, and curriculum selection is normally a long process (over a year), followed by a 3+ year implementation process, with extensive PD for teachers, as well as training for coaches and admin to monitor implementation and support teachers as needed. How will any schools and teachers, and therefore students (!), ever see success if they don't commit to anything for longer than a couple years??
Anonymous wrote:And then teachers, who have spent endless hours in Benchmark training, get to spend even more time in training on a new curriculum due to MCPS' bad decision making. No wonder teachers are leaving MCPS in droves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speaking of Benchmark, has anyone been listening to the Sold a Story podcast?
No. What is it about?
It's about how the "newer" reading programs (aka, not phonics) are actively harming kids' ability to learn how to read. Benchmark was mentioned on the most recent episode.
Not the same Benchmark. MCPS a is using Benchmark Advanced. Totally different thing.
Sounds like the podcast findings do apply to Benchmark Advance’s crappy curriculum, though. -DP
Thanks for clarifying. I had assumed it was the same, since MCPS was mentioned in the prior episode.
I think it is the same. Benchmark Advance is often referred to as Benchmark. I don't see a curriculum called Benchmark other than Benchmark Advance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speaking of Benchmark, has anyone been listening to the Sold a Story podcast?
No. What is it about?
It's about how the "newer" reading programs (aka, not phonics) are actively harming kids' ability to learn how to read. Benchmark was mentioned on the most recent episode.
Not the same Benchmark. MCPS a is using Benchmark Advanced. Totally different thing.
Sounds like the podcast findings do apply to Benchmark Advance’s crappy curriculum, though. -DP
Thanks for clarifying. I had assumed it was the same, since MCPS was mentioned in the prior episode.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speaking of Benchmark, has anyone been listening to the Sold a Story podcast?
No. What is it about?
It's about how the "newer" reading programs (aka, not phonics) are actively harming kids' ability to learn how to read. Benchmark was mentioned on the most recent episode.
Not the same Benchmark. MCPS a is using Benchmark Advanced. Totally different thing.
Sounds like the podcast findings do apply to Benchmark Advance’s crappy curriculum, though. -DP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speaking of Benchmark, has anyone been listening to the Sold a Story podcast?
No. What is it about?
It's about how the "newer" reading programs (aka, not phonics) are actively harming kids' ability to learn how to read. Benchmark was mentioned on the most recent episode.
Not the same Benchmark. MCPS a is using Benchmark Advanced. Totally different thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speaking of Benchmark, has anyone been listening to the Sold a Story podcast?
No. What is it about?
It's about how the "newer" reading programs (aka, not phonics) are actively harming kids' ability to learn how to read. Benchmark was mentioned on the most recent episode.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speaking of Benchmark, has anyone been listening to the Sold a Story podcast?
No. What is it about?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Speaking of Benchmark, has anyone been listening to the Sold a Story podcast?
No. What is it about?
Anonymous wrote:Speaking of Benchmark, has anyone been listening to the Sold a Story podcast?