Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W&M faculty don't even do research and are not recognized in the field (any field). I certainly would not go there for any degree that involves innovation activities like Computer Science
W&M's relative strength is undergraduate teaching, and this is just as strong if not stronger within STEM as outside. But your premise above is completely wrong. W&M faculty do research, and a simple check on the CS faculty pages show all of the tenure track faculty do research. More importantly, almost all undergraduates, and nearly 100% of STEM undergraduates, do guided research with faculty. This is very useful both in getting jobs, but particularly for those applying to graduate school.
Getting into a top CS graduate school from W&M CS would be almost impossible because of both the lack of rigor and variety in the coursework.
All research universities have undergraduate research opportunities for students, far moreso than W&M.
Anonymous wrote:Our friend’s kid just graduated from WM last May as a CS major. Loved going to school there. Just started working at Microsoft this summer and is really happy.
Agree with the poster who said to pick the school where your kid will be happiest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W&M faculty don't even do research and are not recognized in the field (any field). I certainly would not go there for any degree that involves innovation activities like Computer Science
W&M's relative strength is undergraduate teaching, and this is just as strong if not stronger within STEM as outside. But your premise above is completely wrong. W&M faculty do research, and a simple check on the CS faculty pages show all of the tenure track faculty do research. More importantly, almost all undergraduates, and nearly 100% of STEM undergraduates, do guided research with faculty. This is very useful both in getting jobs, but particularly for those applying to graduate school.
Anonymous wrote:Why is anyone asking this anonymous, biased forum?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From CS ranking perspective, UVA is #1 out of these three. UVA also has better students overall.
![]()
![]()
Nice try, but nope. Repeating this does not make it so.
Anonymous wrote:W&M faculty don't even do research and are not recognized in the field (any field). I certainly would not go there for any degree that involves innovation activities like Computer Science
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W&M faculty don't even do research and are not recognized in the field (any field). I certainly would not go there for any degree that involves innovation activities like Computer Science
Yes, I mean it is barely above community college level. Waste of money.
Anonymous wrote:W&M faculty don't even do research and are not recognized in the field (any field). I certainly would not go there for any degree that involves innovation activities like Computer Science
Anonymous wrote:From CS ranking perspective, UVA is #1 out of these three. UVA also has better students overall.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
OMG. You can’t be serious. It’s #28. I can’t even believe you fell for this.
https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-science-schools/computer-science-rankings
Last time I checked STEM was more than CS. Why do all these people only focus on CS? Chemistry, biology, bio-engineering, mathematics, geology etc. C'mon people STEM is a wide group of disciplines and UVA is doing better but not anywhere it should be.
What? You (or the PPP) linked something stating that UVA is “no 1” for computer science. Not even close.
The UVA boosterism is just so over the top.