Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm realizing more and more how clueless people are about basic etiquette. I used to think my mom was too hung up on the "rules", but now I appreciate knowing how to properly host things. I was just talking to BIL's fiancee last night about her potluck wedding shower. Her friend is "hosting", her mother is cooking most of the food, and she has asked MIL to bring food as well. Part of her ignorance about etiquette is cultural, but the same can't be said for most people who just don't have a clue.
Who defines etiquette though? I know it's great to be polite but really, it's 2010 not 1940. Sometimes etiquette is as outdated as some of the religious BS of the Catholic Church. Sit, stand, kneel, sit, stand, kneel... Like the blind leading the blind. It's so regional, cultural, and changeable. You etiquette ladies smitten can be classy and far from tacky w/out judging others or following your outdated etiquette books. Sheesh.
Leaving aside the substance of why we need etiquette:
1. The sweeping insult re: millions of practicing Catholics is just mean and gratuitous.
2. You contradict yourself when you say that those rituals of Catholic worship are "so regional, cultural, and changeable." In fact, not much has changed on that score for many hundreds of years.
Anonymous wrote:
Who defines etiquette though? I know it's great to be polite but really, it's 2010 not 1940. Sometimes etiquette is as outdated as some of the religious BS of the Catholic Church. Sit, stand, kneel, sit, stand, kneel... Like the blind leading the blind. It's so regional, cultural, and changeable. You etiquette ladies smitten can be classy and far from tacky w/out judging others or following your outdated etiquette books. Sheesh.
Anonymous wrote:We had to chip in to cover the costs of a recent baby shower we attended (wish I were joking), and were strongly encouraged to give cash even though there were several registries to choose from. I sent a gift to their home instead, and we got an e-mail (to a group) a few days later, reminding everyone not to send anything to the home as no one was home during the day. Sigh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So for vast swaths of the rest of our nation, it's ok to think of yourself and not your guests?
By this logic, no one could ever have a wedding shower or baby shower or birthday party or any other event in which gifts were allowed. (Meaningless who "hosts" the party - we all know what's really going on here - a gift giving event.) Because obviously the point of such a party must be to receive gifts. How vulgar and selfish.
Not PP, but the point of a baby or wedding shower is to honor the baby/mom-to-be or bride and to shower her/them with gifts. In contrast, the point of a wedding is to get married, and celebrate the new marriage with friends and family at the reception/party.
Or am I wrong about that?
Thank you! The purpose of a shower is to "shower with gifts." In other words-- the wedding is the "celebratory event," in the words of a pp. The shower is to give gifts. If you think that asking for money instead of gifts is crass, fine. But the point of the event is to help someone prepare for their new life with spouse or baby by giving them something they will need. Gosh, people, can you muster some good will for a new mother/newly married person? Being so easily offended is hardly a sign of good character.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So for vast swaths of the rest of our nation, it's ok to think of yourself and not your guests?
By this logic, no one could ever have a wedding shower or baby shower or birthday party or any other event in which gifts were allowed. (Meaningless who "hosts" the party - we all know what's really going on here - a gift giving event.) Because obviously the point of such a party must be to receive gifts. How vulgar and selfish.
Not PP, but the point of a baby or wedding shower is to honor the baby/mom-to-be or bride and to shower her/them with gifts. In contrast, the point of a wedding is to get married, and celebrate the new marriage with friends and family at the reception/party.
Or am I wrong about that?
Anonymous wrote:So for vast swaths of the rest of our nation, it's ok to think of yourself and not your guests?
By this logic, no one could ever have a wedding shower or baby shower or birthday party or any other event in which gifts were allowed. (Meaningless who "hosts" the party - we all know what's really going on here - a gift giving event.) Because obviously the point of such a party must be to receive gifts. How vulgar and selfish.
So for vast swaths of the rest of our nation, it's ok to think of yourself and not your guests?