Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/flsurgeongen/status/1578515633159180289?s=46&t=WL_zrOTp0uvN8lrJuUecdw

Was Twitter in the right to delete this? I’m undecided as I don’t have a science background.

I dont think you have to have a science background to decide whether twitter should censor the FL surgeon general.

Science changes. Thats the whole point of scientific research. To test and validate what we know, while making discoveries to enhance our knowledge. Twitter is anti science because they oppose the discussion and inquiry necessary to improve our body of knowledge.

I’m sure Twitter acted after it heard from legit scientists and experts that the FLSG’s post was dangerous disinformation. The SG is not interested in a good faith discussion.

It doesn’t matter if Twitter heard from “legit scientists and experts.” Those people can be and often are wrong, too. That is the whole point of science. It is not about specious appeals to authority, but rather rigorous, empirical testing. Even if the Florida surgeon general is completely wrong, what should happen is that he should be refuted with actual evidence. Not silenced for being incorrect.

THIS

This is why the Democrats terrify me with their blatant censorship. Which was so over the top during Covid.

This is exactly how science works. If you disagree, you provide data to explain why your disagree. You don’t simply ‘cancel’ the other scientist.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course they should not censor him. Twitter should not be in the business of censoring speech, period.

Myocarditis is a real thing. This age group is not at high risk.

In addition to the very good points made above about what Twitter’s business is, my neighbor the pediatric cardiologist has said all along that the risk of myocarditis is much higher from Covid infection than from the vaccine.

Depends on the age group. Boys/men under 30, you’re wrong.

Anonymous wrote:It's OK. CDC has just added COVID vaccines to their schedule, so pretty much every school will be mandating these.

It’s up to each state.

Anonymous wrote:It's OK. CDC has just added COVID vaccines to their schedule, so pretty much every school will be mandating these.

Like the flu shot, right? That's also on the schedule.

It's OK. CDC has just added COVID vaccines to their schedule, so pretty much every school will be mandating these.

Anonymous wrote:The anonymously published, not peer reviewed study, has many flaws. Anyone who takes that study at face value needs to return to school, I suppose that includes the Florida SG.

This is what Ladapo is doing instead of returning to school.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course they should not censor him. Twitter should not be in the business of censoring speech, period.

Myocarditis is a real thing. This age group is not at high risk.

In addition to the very good points made above about what Twitter’s business is, my neighbor the pediatric cardiologist has said all along that the risk of myocarditis is much higher from Covid infection than from the vaccine.

Facts that Republicans still won’t admit.

Anonymous wrote:Of course they should not censor him. Twitter should not be in the business of censoring speech, period.

Myocarditis is a real thing. This age group is not at high risk.

In addition to the very good points made above about what Twitter’s business is, my neighbor the pediatric cardiologist has said all along that the risk of myocarditis is much higher from Covid infection than from the vaccine.

Anonymous wrote:I’m pro vaccine and am Covid-vaxxed and boosted, but I’m getting tired of the censorship and gaslighting that there are people out there who did get severely injured or died from this vaccine. It happens. Side effects and deaths have occurred in numerous treatments in the past. But the fact that we can’t have an open conversation about THIS vaccine, is incredibly annoying and dishonest.

Why on earth are random tech people on Twitter who have no medical knowledge deciding on health information anyway?

Who is censoring this? And where did this severe injuries or deaths from the vaccine come from? VAERS? That’s not really vetted and anyone can say anything on there. You really think a large number of deaths from the vaccine are being hidden? How many people do you know have had covid and had serious injuries or died? How many people do you know had the vaccine and had serious injuries or died?

Anonymous wrote:Of course they should not censor him. Twitter should not be in the business of censoring speech, period.

Myocarditis is a real thing. This age group is not at high risk.

Twitter is not censoring speech and it is not in the business of censoring speech. Twitter is in the business of selling advertising. The companies selling advertising don't want to be associated with whack jobs promoting conspiracy theories, and the people they are selling advertising to don't want to be bombarded with conspiracy theories, so they try to keep that stuff off their site. The whack jobs are free to post their conspiracy theories on their own sites, or other sites that don't mind having them, and you can go read it there if you'd like.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/flsurgeongen/status/1578515633159180289?s=46&t=WL_zrOTp0uvN8lrJuUecdw

Was Twitter in the right to delete this? I’m undecided as I don’t have a science background.

I dont think you have to have a science background to decide whether twitter should censor the FL surgeon general.

Science changes. Thats the whole point of scientific research. To test and validate what we know, while making discoveries to enhance our knowledge. Twitter is anti science because they oppose the discussion and inquiry necessary to improve our body of knowledge.

I wonder why Florida has experienced a much higher overall death rate than more highly vaccinated states during the post-vaccine pandemic year. I'm sure there's a scientific answer to that.

Oh you know more than the experts?

Anti science smh.

Nope, I'm looking at charts made by scientists at the CDC. Why are you ignoring them? Anti-sciene smh.

NP. Just from a casual glance, it looks like Florida is within one or two standard deviations of the mean for the US. Obviously, having a bit more data would help narrow down the variance. So that data looks normal for any large population study. Everyone isn't going to be average.

But the US contains the Florida data, and Florida is a big state that carries a lot of weight in the US data. It would be more accurate to compare Florida to the rest of the US not including Florida.

Wut? Florida has half the population of California and two-thirds of Texas.

I didn't say Florida is the biggest state. I said it's a big state. Take Florida out of the US data to make a comparison of "the rest of the US" compared to Florida. It doesn't make sense to compare the US including Florida with Florida.

The anonymously published, not peer reviewed study, has many flaws. Anyone who takes that study at face value needs to return to school, I suppose that includes the Florida SG.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/flsurgeongen/status/1578515633159180289?s=46&t=WL_zrOTp0uvN8lrJuUecdw

Was Twitter in the right to delete this? I’m undecided as I don’t have a science background.

I dont think you have to have a science background to decide whether twitter should censor the FL surgeon general.

Science changes. Thats the whole point of scientific research. To test and validate what we know, while making discoveries to enhance our knowledge. Twitter is anti science because they oppose the discussion and inquiry necessary to improve our body of knowledge.

I wonder why Florida has experienced a much higher overall death rate than more highly vaccinated states during the post-vaccine pandemic year. I'm sure there's a scientific answer to that.

Oh you know more than the experts?

Anti science smh.

Nope, I'm looking at charts made by scientists at the CDC. Why are you ignoring them? Anti-sciene smh.

NP. Just from a casual glance, it looks like Florida is within one or two standard deviations of the mean for the US. Obviously, having a bit more data would help narrow down the variance. So that data looks normal for any large population study. Everyone isn't going to be average.

But the US contains the Florida data, and Florida is a big state that carries a lot of weight in the US data. It would be more accurate to compare Florida to the rest of the US not including Florida.

It's already rates.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/flsurgeongen/status/1578515633159180289?s=46&t=WL_zrOTp0uvN8lrJuUecdw

Was Twitter in the right to delete this? I’m undecided as I don’t have a science background.

I dont think you have to have a science background to decide whether twitter should censor the FL surgeon general.

Science changes. Thats the whole point of scientific research. To test and validate what we know, while making discoveries to enhance our knowledge. Twitter is anti science because they oppose the discussion and inquiry necessary to improve our body of knowledge.

I wonder why Florida has experienced a much higher overall death rate than more highly vaccinated states during the post-vaccine pandemic year. I'm sure there's a scientific answer to that.

Oh you know more than the experts?

Anti science smh.

Nope, I'm looking at charts made by scientists at the CDC. Why are you ignoring them? Anti-sciene smh.

NP. Just from a casual glance, it looks like Florida is within one or two standard deviations of the mean for the US. Obviously, having a bit more data would help narrow down the variance. So that data looks normal for any large population study. Everyone isn't going to be average.

But the US contains the Florida data, and Florida is a big state that carries a lot of weight in the US data. It would be more accurate to compare Florida to the rest of the US not including Florida.

Wut? Florida has half the population of California and two-thirds of Texas.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/flsurgeongen/status/1578515633159180289?s=46&t=WL_zrOTp0uvN8lrJuUecdw

Was Twitter in the right to delete this? I’m undecided as I don’t have a science background.

I dont think you have to have a science background to decide whether twitter should censor the FL surgeon general.

Science changes. Thats the whole point of scientific research. To test and validate what we know, while making discoveries to enhance our knowledge. Twitter is anti science because they oppose the discussion and inquiry necessary to improve our body of knowledge.

I wonder why Florida has experienced a much higher overall death rate than more highly vaccinated states during the post-vaccine pandemic year. I'm sure there's a scientific answer to that.

Oh you know more than the experts?

Anti science smh.

Nope, I'm looking at charts made by scientists at the CDC. Why are you ignoring them? Anti-sciene smh.

NP. Just from a casual glance, it looks like Florida is within one or two standard deviations of the mean for the US. Obviously, having a bit more data would help narrow down the variance. So that data looks normal for any large population study. Everyone isn't going to be average.

But the US contains the Florida data, and Florida is a big state that carries a lot of weight in the US data. It would be more accurate to compare Florida to the rest of the US not including Florida.