Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:‘Member when Republicans loved him a couple days ago when he wore “White Lives Matter” shirts with Candace Owens?

I remember.



https://www.thejc.com/news/news/kanye-west-says-hell-go-death-con-3-on-jews-in-now-removed-tweet-4uAVN4ibRf7523jKIeitjz

He’s not a politician and if you find celebrities and their antics interesting take it to the appropriate forum.

Republicans were on the verge of trotting Kanye out as their shiny, new token ahead of the midterms to try to appeal to young voters of color. Oops, that’s gone down in flames 🔥

Why are Republicans constantly promoting African Americans who are insane (Herschel Walker, Kanye, Candace Owens), total grifters (Herman Cain), or pathologically repressed (Clarence Thomas)? It’s like Republicans have nothing to appeal to normal African Americans.

I’m sure someone in GOP HQ is seriously wondering if they can get Bill Cosby endorsement ahead of the November midterms.

Do you know why they pick these particular Black people? Because these people do two things. 1) Allow white people to say “See, I’m not racist” while 2) capitalizing on the racist stereotypes of Black people in our culture. Walker-athlete, not too bright, crazy/off, violent. Kanye-music, entertainer, crazy, unpredictable. Cosby would fulfill the racist stereotype that Black men can’t be trusted around whites women. That last racist stereotype was used to kill Emmet Till. Why do you think Obama drove so many of them nuts? He blew up the racist stereotypes they had about Black men. He was clearly super smart (as was Michelle). He was a committed husband and father. He was an intellectual. I could go on and on. Go read some history of racism, read some Baldwin, and you’ll see.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DEFCON goes up to 5.

5 is the least-threatening DEFCON status

Please stop imagining you’re the smartest person in the room.

Isnt DEFCON a 1990s thing? Asking since youre a DEFCON expert.

There was a movie in like '85 that was called DefCon 4.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Attorney General of Indiana apparently has nothing more important to do:

Apparently we have our own morality police here and they exercise their power through social media.

Atty Gen of Indiana is right. GO ELON MUSK

Lmao

Social consequences for outright anti-Sémitism is now the “morality police” according to the GOP.

Hey Jewish Republicans - do you feel stupid yet? You were always going to get used.

Nope. I wrote that and I AM a Jewish conservative. I don't see the post as anti-Semitic.

Elon fanboys never disappoint.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Attorney General of Indiana apparently has nothing more important to do:

Apparently we have our own morality police here and they exercise their power through social media.

Atty Gen of Indiana is right. GO ELON MUSK

Lmao

Social consequences for outright anti-Sémitism is now the “morality police” according to the GOP.

Hey Jewish Republicans - do you feel stupid yet? You were always going to get used.

Nope. I wrote that and I AM a Jewish conservative. I don't see the post as anti-Semitic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Attorney General of Indiana apparently has nothing more important to do:

Apparently we have our own morality police here and they exercise their power through social media.

Atty Gen of Indiana is right. GO ELON MUSK

Lmao

Social consequences for outright anti-Sémitism is now the “morality police” according to the GOP.

Hey Jewish Republicans - do you feel stupid yet? You were always going to get used.

What Republicans wish to do - whipping up antisemitic fervor -is the equivalent of yelling fire in a theater. It’s dangerous. It’s not sharing some outre opinion about a television show, it’s going to get people killed.

Anonymous wrote:The Attorney General of Indiana apparently has nothing more important to do:

Apparently we have our own morality police here and they exercise their power through social media.

Atty Gen of Indiana is right. GO ELON MUSK

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kanye is kinda crazy and kinda brilliant and I think pretty harmless

Telling tens of millions of followers that he will go “Death con 3 on the Jews” is opposite of harmless.

In more civilized countries, speech like that is rightfully illegal.

The nations that arent fascist have greater restrictions on speech. Is that how it works?

Tell us your address so we can let Kanye know where to send his mob. Should it be legal for him to wish “Death Con 3” on your kids? Maybe he can wish Death Con 3 on your kids’ school and encourage people to bear arms there.

Freedom of speech, right?

If you're opposed to freedom of speech, it means that you favor a more authoritarian approach to governance.

Even in our society, however, it is illegal to make threats of violence, as you might be doing against schoolchildren.

Should a threat of violence against Jews be illegal in the US? Yes or no.

I think laws should be changed to make it illegal.

Let us know your answer in definitive terms.

The threat of violence against *anyone* should be illegal, if we’re going to make stuff like that illegal. But Jews, as well as any other group, don’t get a special cut out. It’s either illegal for everyone, or no one.

Then again, if such threats WERE made illegal, I don’t think dems would have many people left outside jail, given the frequency with which they threaten republicans.

Strawman is made of straw 🌾

I like your rhetorical feat of nesting Strawman arguments inside each other. Truly, your Dark Arts training has paid off.

You speak a lot, yet contribute nothing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DEFCON goes up to 5.

5 is the least-threatening DEFCON status

Please stop imagining you’re the smartest person in the room.

Isnt DEFCON a 1990s thing? Asking since youre a DEFCON expert.

Anti-Semitism is now “independent thinking.”

The Attorney General of Indiana apparently has nothing more important to do:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:‘Member when Republicans loved him a couple days ago when he wore “White Lives Matter” shirts with Candace Owens?

I remember.



https://www.thejc.com/news/news/kanye-west-says-hell-go-death-con-3-on-jews-in-now-removed-tweet-4uAVN4ibRf7523jKIeitjz

He’s not a politician and if you find celebrities and their antics interesting take it to the appropriate forum.

Republicans were on the verge of trotting Kanye out as their shiny, new token ahead of the midterms to try to appeal to young voters of color. Oops, that’s gone down in flames 🔥

Why are Republicans constantly promoting African Americans who are insane (Herschel Walker, Kanye, Candace Owens), total grifters (Herman Cain), or pathologically repressed (Clarence Thomas)? It’s like Republicans have nothing to appeal to normal African Americans.

I’m sure someone in GOP HQ is seriously wondering if they can get Bill Cosby endorsement ahead of the November midterms.

Here’s Candace today with some gaslighting

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kanye is kinda crazy and kinda brilliant and I think pretty harmless

Telling tens of millions of followers that he will go “Death con 3 on the Jews” is opposite of harmless.

In more civilized countries, speech like that is rightfully illegal.

The nations that arent fascist have greater restrictions on speech. Is that how it works?

Tell us your address so we can let Kanye know where to send his mob. Should it be legal for him to wish “Death Con 3” on your kids? Maybe he can wish Death Con 3 on your kids’ school and encourage people to bear arms there.

Freedom of speech, right?

If you're opposed to freedom of speech, it means that you favor a more authoritarian approach to governance.

Even in our society, however, it is illegal to make threats of violence, as you might be doing against schoolchildren.

Should a threat of violence against Jews be illegal in the US? Yes or no.

I think laws should be changed to make it illegal.

Let us know your answer in definitive terms.

The threat of violence against *anyone* should be illegal, if we’re going to make stuff like that illegal. But Jews, as well as any other group, don’t get a special cut out. It’s either illegal for everyone, or no one.

Then again, if such threats WERE made illegal, I don’t think dems would have many people left outside jail, given the frequency with which they threaten republicans.

Strawman is made of straw 🌾

I like your rhetorical feat of nesting Strawman arguments inside each other. Truly, your Dark Arts training has paid off.

Anonymous wrote:DEFCON goes up to 5.

5 is the least-threatening DEFCON status

Please stop imagining you’re the smartest person in the room.

Anonymous wrote:It's only going to get worse for Jews in the US.

The vibes are definitely off.