Anonymous wrote:Two adults marrying each other should pay for their own wedding, if they insist on having one. I would not pay for any of my children's weddings, doesn't matter which gender they are, because my children can totally pay their own way in life. I didn't raise them to ask for handouts.
Anonymous wrote:I have three daughters and I believe 100 percent Father of Bride pays.
But the rules when that was in effect the grooms side pays rehearsal dinner, honeymoon, groom comes in debt free no student loans and the Groom traditionally provides a home and if wife decides to be a SAHM support her. And of course Groom has a good job and a good person with right values.
My brother married a pretty nice girl around four years younger, he was 29 she was 25. Her blue collar parents paid.
Well that was 30 years ago. She has not worked in 25 years. Drives a brand new Lexus, belongs to two country clubs at her primary and Florida home. My brother helps out in-laws both financially and physically. Paid all colleges. Hosts all holiday parties. Even pays for in-laws tickets for vacation.
But makes a lot. It was an investment and their community college pretty daughter is by far the richest person on their side of family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bride price should also be dropped. There is no reason for the groom's family to give money, land, cattle to the bride's family.
LOL +1
It's an outdated concept and the underlying reasons are no longer in play. Also, the bridal industrial complex has gotten out of hand and weddings have become ridiculously expensive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bride price should also be dropped. There is no reason for the groom's family to give money, land, cattle to the bride's family.
LOL +1
It's an outdated concept and the underlying reasons are no longer in play. Also, the bridal industrial complex has gotten out of hand and weddings have become ridiculously expensive.
And there is no need for an engagement ring anymore either. It’s all financially silly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bride price should also be dropped. There is no reason for the groom's family to give money, land, cattle to the bride's family.
LOL +1
It's an outdated concept and the underlying reasons are no longer in play. Also, the bridal industrial complex has gotten out of hand and weddings have become ridiculously expensive.
Anonymous wrote:Bride price should also be dropped. There is no reason for the groom's family to give money, land, cattle to the bride's family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was the bride, and my parents paid for the wedding, but that was because they wanted the wedding. My DH and I were fine with just signing papers at the courthouse and being done with it. We went through with the wedding because it made my parents happy.
I got married fairly young and my parents paid for all of it, but they also planned almost all of it. Like this poster, I would have been very happy not having a reception at all or doing something small. Other than a small handful of friends, they invited who they wanted. They toured wedding venues without us and narrowed it down to two which then I saw. The wedding was more for the extended family, not for us.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Assuming anyone’s parents are paying and both sets of parents have the money, bride’s side should handle day of wedding and groom’s side should handle the previous night. In all three weddings we’ve been involved in recently, the expenditures were very similar, as the entire guest list was invited to an expensive rehearsal dinner/welcome party.
This is the Christian US WASP concept of rehersal and actual wedding. No. Just stop with this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was NEVER Brides parents it is Father of Bride.
Does anyone really think last huge fancy wedding I went to the Mom of Bride who has not worked in 25 years was paying.
Just stop with your ultra-misogynist stance. We can tell every time you post that you're a weird incel.