Anonymous
Post 09/22/2022 23:25     Subject: So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
Anonymous wrote:Funny how liberals are desperate to discredit the FACTS posted by the WSJ in previous posts as "propaganda." Bless your hearts. You may be embarrassed by these FACTS (you should be), but you certainly can't deny their validity. The fact that you continue to gaslight just makes it clear how desperate you are to deflect and obfuscate. Too late.


So you continue to demonstrate that you can’t distinguish between fact & opinion. And equity & “CRT”.

Anonymous
Post 09/22/2022 22:10     Subject: So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
Funny how liberals are desperate to discredit the FACTS posted by the WSJ in previous posts as "propaganda." Bless your hearts. You may be embarrassed by these FACTS (you should be), but you certainly can't deny their validity. The fact that you continue to gaslight just makes it clear how desperate you are to deflect and obfuscate. Too late.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2022 21:31     Subject: Re:So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
Anonymous wrote:CRT is hitching a ride on the back of the terrorist bandwagon at the Southern border. Sure to make a reappearance the next election season, only to disappear elsewhere. Right now, bullying trans kids and making sure their parents have the ability to drive them to suicide is the GOP cause de jure.


+1

Go look at the thread about Youngkin’s attack on LGBTQ youth.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2022 21:29     Subject: So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So cute. The MAGAs are still falling for lies.


It's adorable how libs continue to gaslight - even in the face of facts, posted over and over. *shrug*


No facts were posted. Just propaganda, lapped up and regurgitated by Right Wing smooth brains.


+1
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2022 20:27     Subject: So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So cute. The MAGAs are still falling for lies.


It's adorable how libs continue to gaslight - even in the face of facts, posted over and over. *shrug*


LOL. “Facts”?

The fact is Youngkin supporters believe lies and consider them “facts” because they are gullible AF.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2022 19:29     Subject: So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So cute. The MAGAs are still falling for lies.


It's adorable how libs continue to gaslight - even in the face of facts, posted over and over. *shrug*


No facts were posted. Just propaganda, lapped up and regurgitated by Right Wing smooth brains.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2022 19:26     Subject: So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way it magically went away, right...RIGHT???


Of course not. In some cases school systems are doubling down on their commitment to “equity,” which is effectively CRT is practice.

This battle over the future of our schools and nation will play out for years to come - namely, is the goal to provide equal opportunity or to radically redistribute private wealth and societal resources to certain groups (principally ADOS) with the illusory goal of promoting equal outcomes.


Thanks for letting us know that you, like all of Youngkin’s sycophants, don’t know what CRT is.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2022 19:24     Subject: So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
CRT is the basis of which the faithful make the leap from believing in “equality of opportunity” to “equality of outcome”. It’s not enough to provide equality of opportunity as the opportunity will either never manifest or will be corrupted due to the inherent racism in the process. Hence the focus on equality of outcome. Till the time elite universities as well as prisons have an identical racial makeup as our overall demographics - CRT will keep rearing its ugly head.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2022 10:28     Subject: Re:So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
CRT is hitching a ride on the back of the terrorist bandwagon at the Southern border. Sure to make a reappearance the next election season, only to disappear elsewhere. Right now, bullying trans kids and making sure their parents have the ability to drive them to suicide is the GOP cause de jure.
Anonymous
Post 09/21/2022 21:11     Subject: So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way it magically went away, right...RIGHT???


Of course not. In some cases school systems are doubling down on their commitment to “equity,” which is effectively CRT is practice.

This battle over the future of our schools and nation will play out for years to come - namely, is the goal to provide equal opportunity or to radically redistribute private wealth and societal resources to certain groups (principally ADOS) with the illusory goal of promoting equal outcomes.


No school system is doing that or else you'd hear about it, sweetie. Fox would cover it like a fly on shit. OP meant that there was never any CRT to begin with. You got played, its okay.

+1
CRT actually refers to a real legal theory about the ways that facially neutral laws could have different effects on different groups of people because of the way that racism shapes the system, not just the individual. It is not, and has never been taught in grade school. Some people used it to mean "teaching American history in a way that includes bad stuff white people did," which is just...history. (The reason they picked that particular term was because originally they tried to tie it to Marxist critical theory, which is something else entirely.)


This focus on semantics by Dems about what exactly and technically counts as CRT turned out to be a very unpersuasive talking pt in the election. I say this as a Dem. We need better messaging, they are winning at that game.


Yeah by lying. Republicans do this, they just make shit up and out dems on the defensive.


Except nothing has been made up. Are you unable or simply unwilling to actually read the links that have been provided? The more you gaslight (LIE) about this issue, the worse you look. Just admit that plenty of teachers are being trained using CRT materials. And their training logically seeps into their teaching - as intended. Again - facts have been posted. You can continue petulantly denying, but it's beyond obvious you are not a serious person.
DP
Anonymous
Post 09/21/2022 20:38     Subject: So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way it magically went away, right...RIGHT???


Of course not. In some cases school systems are doubling down on their commitment to “equity,” which is effectively CRT is practice.

This battle over the future of our schools and nation will play out for years to come - namely, is the goal to provide equal opportunity or to radically redistribute private wealth and societal resources to certain groups (principally ADOS) with the illusory goal of promoting equal outcomes.


No school system is doing that or else you'd hear about it, sweetie. Fox would cover it like a fly on shit. OP meant that there was never any CRT to begin with. You got played, its okay.

+1
CRT actually refers to a real legal theory about the ways that facially neutral laws could have different effects on different groups of people because of the way that racism shapes the system, not just the individual. It is not, and has never been taught in grade school. Some people used it to mean "teaching American history in a way that includes bad stuff white people did," which is just...history. (The reason they picked that particular term was because originally they tried to tie it to Marxist critical theory, which is something else entirely.)


This focus on semantics by Dems about what exactly and technically counts as CRT turned out to be a very unpersuasive talking pt in the election. I say this as a Dem. We need better messaging, they are winning at that game.


Yeah by lying. Republicans do this, they just make shit up and out dems on the defensive.
Anonymous
Post 09/21/2022 20:37     Subject: So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:No way it magically went away, right...RIGHT???


Of course not. In some cases school systems are doubling down on their commitment to “equity,” which is effectively CRT is practice.

This battle over the future of our schools and nation will play out for years to come - namely, is the goal to provide equal opportunity or to radically redistribute private wealth and societal resources to certain groups (principally ADOS) with the illusory goal of promoting equal outcomes.


No school system is doing that or else you'd hear about it, sweetie. Fox would cover it like a fly on shit. OP meant that there was never any CRT to begin with. You got played, its okay.

+1
CRT actually refers to a real legal theory about the ways that facially neutral laws could have different effects on different groups of people because of the way that racism shapes the system, not just the individual. It is not, and has never been taught in grade school. Some people used it to mean "teaching American history in a way that includes bad stuff white people did," which is just...history. (The reason they picked that particular term was because originally they tried to tie it to Marxist critical theory, which is something else entirely.)


This focus on semantics by Dems about what exactly and technically counts as CRT turned out to be a very unpersuasive talking pt in the election. I say this as a Dem. We need better messaging, they are winning at that game.
Anonymous
Post 09/21/2022 20:33     Subject: Re:So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What are you talking about OP? A little more serious discussion and comment, please, or this will be reported as a troll post.


I'm saying I thought CRT was a thing, how come its not talked about more after the election.


Ask the principal of your children's Virginia school. They are very well informed on the topic.
Anonymous
Post 09/21/2022 17:57     Subject: So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
Anonymous wrote:So cute. The MAGAs are still falling for lies.


It's adorable how libs continue to gaslight - even in the face of facts, posted over and over. *shrug*
Anonymous
Post 09/21/2022 17:56     Subject: So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about
So cute. The MAGAs are still falling for lies.