Anonymous wrote:I saw this too recently. The mom had her hair in a top bun and was wearing a large t-shirt.
Basically how I would dress if I'm staying home and cleaning the house.
DH said that with tele work and the way companies are being more accepting of things such as tattoos/piercings that they also are basically OK with this too. I was amazed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the academic circles of my previous life, looking polished was a sign that one wasn't passionate enough about their research, and was devoting energy to superficial unnecessary things. Kind of like jocks versus nerds.
I have a hard time shaking those values for my government workplace presence. And honestly, I'm ok owning that.
This is me, though corporate rather than government, but in an academic-like function so it's sort of ok. But I might be moving to the kind of job where you have to be polished and I'm daunted by the expense and time involved.
There are services that send you weekly boxes of trendy corporate wear if you don't mind the expense but value the time
Anonymous wrote:My former gubmint supervisor looked like a fat hamster. Cankles, thick glasses, no makeup, huge age spots, a big nose, weak chin, and huge horse teeth. Ugly on the outside and inside too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the academic circles of my previous life, looking polished was a sign that one wasn't passionate enough about their research, and was devoting energy to superficial unnecessary things. Kind of like jocks versus nerds.
I have a hard time shaking those values for my government workplace presence. And honestly, I'm ok owning that.
This is me, though corporate rather than government, but in an academic-like function so it's sort of ok. But I might be moving to the kind of job where you have to be polished and I'm daunted by the expense and time involved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the academic circles of my previous life, looking polished was a sign that one wasn't passionate enough about their research, and was devoting energy to superficial unnecessary things. Kind of like jocks versus nerds.
I have a hard time shaking those values for my government workplace presence. And honestly, I'm ok owning that.
This is me, though corporate rather than government, but in an academic-like function so it's sort of ok. But I might be moving to the kind of job where you have to be polished and I'm daunted by the expense and time involved.
THIS. Looking good as a female- for most of us, except the genetically gifted or those who grew up wealthy- requires a significant investment of cost. Im not paid enough to look pretty and do work. If I have to spend more than 20 minutes getting ready in the morning to go to my job, I need to think that my payment for services is a reflection of my job and my appearance. Think waitressing. Although, pretty people with ok service still tend to make better tips than non-attractive people with better service. Some friends of friends work in sales and the amount of stuff the women do is insane. The beauty industry also has crazy amounts of money required because they are selling the same thing as most sales people, themselves. So it's self-tanner, lasers for the face, botox, fillers, boob jobs, teeth whitening, haircuts/extension/coloring, makeup, skin care, lashes, brows, manicures and pedicures, nice clothing, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the academic circles of my previous life, looking polished was a sign that one wasn't passionate enough about their research, and was devoting energy to superficial unnecessary things. Kind of like jocks versus nerds.
I have a hard time shaking those values for my government workplace presence. And honestly, I'm ok owning that.
This is me, though corporate rather than government, but in an academic-like function so it's sort of ok. But I might be moving to the kind of job where you have to be polished and I'm daunted by the expense and time involved.