Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women and girls should not have to ask for permission to control whether or not they have a child. Period.

Does it make it so because you put a period after the sentence or because you insert the word period after the sentence?

Exclamation point!

Can I ask a question? Question mark?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has a guardian who supports the abortion. Why is the guardian’s permission not enough?

Read the article, stupid. It clearly says she wanted the baby at one point and is grieving the death of a friend. Judge wants her to pause to make sure of decision before moving forward.
God, you’re dumb.

Actually, if you read, it does NOT say she wanted the baby, but that she was open to it, which is not nearly as definitive.

You just proved my point.

Not in the slightest. Words have meaning, and yours were inaccurate.

Richt, words have meaning which is exactly how you proved my point.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women and girls should not have to ask for permission to control whether or not they have a child. Period.

Does it make it so because you put a period after the sentence or because you insert the word period after the sentence?

Exclamation point!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women and girls should not have to ask for permission to control whether or not they have a child. Period.

Does it make it so because you put a period after the sentence or because you insert the word period after the sentence?

Anonymous wrote:Women and girls should not have to ask for permission to control whether or not they have a child. Period.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has a guardian who supports the abortion. Why is the guardian’s permission not enough?

Read the article, stupid. It clearly says she wanted the baby at one point and is grieving the death of a friend. Judge wants her to pause to make sure of decision before moving forward.
God, you’re dumb.

Actually, if you read, it does NOT say she wanted the baby, but that she was open to it, which is not nearly as definitive.

You just proved my point.

Not in the slightest. Words have meaning, and yours were inaccurate.

Anonymous wrote:Not seeing this -- is she white?

I assume she is. No judge in Florida would be taking extra steps to protect the "unborn child" of a Hispanic or Black girl.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What happens if the guardian takes her out of state for an abortion?

You need adult consent. I'm assuming the guardian is the one refusing to consent.

Anonymous wrote:What happens if the guardian takes her out of state for an abortion?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If someone's not mature enough to get an abortion how could they possibly be mature enough to raise a baby? They are not just dooming the girl to a life of poverty and ignorance but also dooming the unborn to a life of poverty. Not that being poor should be a crime, but how many books will this unborn kid have in their home? How safe will their home be? How safe will their shitty daycare be? How healthy will their diet be?

You can do all these things on a low income and there are things like day care vouchers. Your post is a stretch but she should be granted the choice. Many rich people parent poorly.

I have been on welfare and food stamps and those are crappy daycares that don’t have cameras, are understaffed, and don’t feel safe.

Most day cares are crappy, paid or not and camera's only do so much. Being poor is not a reason to have an abortion. Being young with you entire future ahead of you is.

It’s really not up to anyone else to decide whether a woman has a baby or not. As a women who was thrust from a comfortable MC class life into poverty after divorce (with two kids), let me tell you: being poor is a very, very compelling reason not to have a child.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If someone's not mature enough to get an abortion how could they possibly be mature enough to raise a baby? They are not just dooming the girl to a life of poverty and ignorance but also dooming the unborn to a life of poverty. Not that being poor should be a crime, but how many books will this unborn kid have in their home? How safe will their home be? How safe will their shitty daycare be? How healthy will their diet be?

You can do all these things on a low income and there are things like day care vouchers. Your post is a stretch but she should be granted the choice. Many rich people parent poorly.

I have been on welfare and food stamps and those are crappy daycares that don’t have cameras, are understaffed, and don’t feel safe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If someone's not mature enough to get an abortion how could they possibly be mature enough to raise a baby? They are not just dooming the girl to a life of poverty and ignorance but also dooming the unborn to a life of poverty. Not that being poor should be a crime, but how many books will this unborn kid have in their home? How safe will their home be? How safe will their shitty daycare be? How healthy will their diet be?

You can do all these things on a low income and there are things like day care vouchers. Your post is a stretch but she should be granted the choice. Many rich people parent poorly.

I have been on welfare and food stamps and those are crappy daycares that don’t have cameras, are understaffed, and don’t feel safe.

Most day cares are crappy, paid or not and camera's only do so much. Being poor is not a reason to have an abortion. Being young with you entire future ahead of you is.