Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Questions 1, 2, and 4 are invalid. They make you sound like an OpenFCPSer.
1&2: FCPS is not a club for parents, students, and teachers. We live in a community where all can participate.
3: Absolutely valid.
4: no politician will ever admit to this. People running for president "are focused on their current jobs right now". We all know the drill. Grow up.

They are perfectly valid. Your assertion that they are not should be an automatic disqualification from voting.

Proud member of OpenFCPS here. If you never took the time to engage with any of us through real life, in person conversation, go back to your keyboard warrior rants and virtue signaling yard signs. Stop mocking parents who simply want the best possible education for their children. No one forced your child to attend school in person, but the school board forced my children to attend virtually. It was wrong. Every one sees that now. OpenFCPS parents were ahead of the curve.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Questions 1, 2, and 4 are invalid. They make you sound like an OpenFCPSer.
1&2: FCPS is not a club for parents, students, and teachers. We live in a community where all can participate.

True. But some stakeholders are more vested in others and it raises questions. If they are not an employee, student, or family member WHY are they so interested in being around someone else's child? There are bad actors out there and we want to keep kids safe.

Oh good. OP is one of the anti-gay “must be pedos” projection movement.

Cool.

Cool cool cool.

NO I am absolutely not one of these people. I am just really fed up with the bullshit that is Karl Frisch who is only using this job as a stepping stone into a larger political career and doesn't give one single shit about children or improving the school system. I want to avoid people like him in the future.

Frisch has been a crappy SB member and there’s no reason for you to be defensive about wanting him replaced.

Frisch isn't running for SB again. He's running for Mark Keam's delegate seat. The Fairfax Dems are backing yet another unqualified person with no children for the Providence SB seat. Are we going to make the mistake a 3rd time?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Questions 1, 2, and 4 are invalid. They make you sound like an OpenFCPSer.
1&2: FCPS is not a club for parents, students, and teachers. We live in a community where all can participate.

True. But some stakeholders are more vested in others and it raises questions. If they are not an employee, student, or family member WHY are they so interested in being around someone else's child? There are bad actors out there and we want to keep kids safe.

Oh good. OP is one of the anti-gay “must be pedos” projection movement.

Cool.

Cool cool cool.

That’s exactly how I read it too.

Me too

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Questions 1, 2, and 4 are invalid. They make you sound like an OpenFCPSer.
1&2: FCPS is not a club for parents, students, and teachers. We live in a community where all can participate.

True. But some stakeholders are more vested in others and it raises questions. If they are not an employee, student, or family member WHY are they so interested in being around someone else's child? There are bad actors out there and we want to keep kids safe.

Oh good. OP is one of the anti-gay “must be pedos” projection movement.

Cool.

Cool cool cool.

NO I am absolutely not one of these people. I am just really fed up with the bullshit that is Karl Frisch who is only using this job as a stepping stone into a larger political career and doesn't give one single shit about children or improving the school system. I want to avoid people like him in the future.

Frisch has been a crappy SB member and there’s no reason for you to be defensive about wanting him replaced.