Anonymous wrote:It's a rule in all debates on AP courses that no one ever talks about what is actually taught in AP courses vs. their existing substitutes. The two camps just choose up sides for and against and punch away from there.
I tried to interject earlier what I know about AP History and Geography courses to no avail. I know why I prefer, as a teacher, not to teach to the AP test. But no one else here has shown any indication that they know what is taught in an AP classroom or included on an AP exam other than what they have heard second- or thirdhand.
A real debate what include what is taught in AP-substitute courses and whether it seems more worthwhile or not. I keep hoping that someone informed will join the debate for that purpose.
Anonymous wrote:In reality most of these schools will still offer the same classes they always have just without the AP designation. Giving their teachers the freedom to go in-depth/tangent on whatever topic interest them(not necessarily students) and provide the schools more marketing freedom about rigorousness of their classes. The students will then buy all the prep materials(books,cards,mock exams) to prepare for the exam outside of class and take the AP exams. The schools will in turn claim some great feat of education by indicating the % of students passing the AP exam without taking the course.
Until I see or hear of a new slate of courses at these schools that kids are excited about, I’ll take it for exactly what it seems, a marketing ploy.
Anonymous wrote:Several things bother me about this as a parent of a high schooler at one of these schools that dropped AP classes
First, the DOJ sued and settled with these DMV schools alleging collusion. They colluded and did not ask parent input. Big party foul. Look up the DOJ news release
Second, my school still offers the tests but not the classes. The school college office is very oblique when asked why. Here’s what I figured out since we are now deep in college process. Many colleges in US still take AP test scores to place kids out of required core classes. Otherwise the kid has to repeat language or chemistry or math at many of these schools. That’s actually an economic and choice architecture loss. The Ivies mostly stopped allowing AP tests to place out but basically every other college does grant credit. And credit is time and money.
Finally, the UK and EU universities - many of whom are gaining in popularity I notice, require 3 to 5 AP classes.
There’s never been a single email from our school warning parents of these last two facts. Not one.
And the UC system specifically calculates weighted GPA using AP. They do not accept UL tagged classes as high level. So these DC private schools have screwed over their students for UC admission. And the data shows that. The DC private YC admits to UCLA and UCB are very low last two years (can see it on UC regeants website)
So most parents and kids ignored signing up for AP tests (you can take the tests but they don’t teach the class). A small subset took the tests.
My advice - if you think at all that your kid fits into any of these buckets (placing out / up of some college core, UK/EU/Canada colleges, or UC) then have them sign up for AP tests at beginning of each each school year - esp sophomore, jr, senior. You can always opt out in the spring
Now if my $45k of tuition would compel the college office to explain this to parents and kids in advance, it would be great.
Instead they send this annual September email that says “you don’t need to sign up for these tests but here’s the link).
Anonymous wrote:Several things bother me about this as a parent of a high schooler at one of these schools that dropped AP classes
First, the DOJ sued and settled with these DMV schools alleging collusion. They colluded and did not ask parent input. Big party foul. Look up the DOJ news release
Second, my school still offers the tests but not the classes. The school college office is very oblique when asked why. Here’s what I figured out since we are now deep in college process. Many colleges in US still take AP test scores to place kids out of required core classes. Otherwise the kid has to repeat language or chemistry or math at many of these schools. That’s actually an economic and choice architecture loss. The Ivies mostly stopped allowing AP tests to place out but basically every other college does grant credit. And credit is time and money.
Finally, the UK and EU universities - many of whom are gaining in popularity I notice, require 3 to 5 AP classes.
There’s never been a single email from our school warning parents of these last two facts. Not one.
And the UC system specifically calculates weighted GPA using AP. They do not accept UL tagged classes as high level. So these DC private schools have screwed over their students for UC admission. And the data shows that. The DC private YC admits to UCLA and UCB are very low last two years (can see it on UC regeants website)
So most parents and kids ignored signing up for AP tests (you can take the tests but they don’t teach the class). A small subset took the tests.
My advice - if you think at all that your kid fits into any of these buckets (placing out / up of some college core, UK/EU/Canada colleges, or UC) then have them sign up for AP tests at beginning of each each school year - esp sophomore, jr, senior. You can always opt out in the spring
Now if my $45k of tuition would compel the college office to explain this to parents and kids in advance, it would be great.
Instead they send this annual September email that says “you don’t need to sign up for these tests but here’s the link).
Anonymous wrote:Several things bother me about this as a parent of a high schooler at one of these schools that dropped AP classes
First, the DOJ sued and settled with these DMV schools alleging collusion. They colluded and did not ask parent input. Big party foul. Look up the DOJ news release
Second, my school still offers the tests but not the classes. The school college office is very oblique when asked why. Here’s what I figured out since we are now deep in college process. Many colleges in US still take AP test scores to place kids out of required core classes. Otherwise the kid has to repeat language or chemistry or math at many of these schools. That’s actually an economic and choice architecture loss. The Ivies mostly stopped allowing AP tests to place out but basically every other college does grant credit. And credit is time and money.
Finally, the UK and EU universities - many of whom are gaining in popularity I notice, require 3 to 5 AP classes.
There’s never been a single email from our school warning parents of these last two facts. Not one.
And the UC system specifically calculates weighted GPA using AP. They do not accept UL tagged classes as high level. So these DC private schools have screwed over their students for UC admission. And the data shows that. The DC private YC admits to UCLA and UCB are very low last two years (can see it on UC regeants website)
So most parents and kids ignored signing up for AP tests (you can take the tests but they don’t teach the class). A small subset took the tests.
My advice - if you think at all that your kid fits into any of these buckets (placing out / up of some college core, UK/EU/Canada colleges, or UC) then have them sign up for AP tests at beginning of each each school year - esp sophomore, jr, senior. You can always opt out in the spring
Now if my $45k of tuition would compel the college office to explain this to parents and kids in advance, it would be great.
Instead they send this annual September email that says “you don’t need to sign up for these tests but here’s the link).
Anonymous wrote:The real issue seems to be that STA joined a coalition of schools and agreed to drop all APs, but they did not. In addition they are now not letting NCS students into their AP classes. Is it because NCS is in the coalition of non-AP schools?
Anonymous wrote:It's a rule in all debates on AP courses that no one ever talks about what is actually taught in AP courses vs. their existing substitutes. The two camps just choose up sides for and against and punch away from there.
I tried to interject earlier what I know about AP History and Geography courses to no avail. I know why I prefer, as a teacher, not to teach to the AP test. But no one else here has shown any indication that they know what is taught in an AP classroom or included on an AP exam other than what they have heard second- or thirdhand.
A real debate what include what is taught in AP-substitute courses and whether it seems more worthwhile or not. I keep hoping that someone informed will join the debate for that purpose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sorry to be dense but can someone remind me why they decided to do this in the first place? Wasn't it somewhat controversial?
The claims were : students may pass up other courses to get the college credits from AP courses, and that moving away from the courses would allow them to offer a wider variety of courses that were equally rigorous and enriching.
However, I’ve yet to hear what rigorous courses are replacing the APs at all these schools. More I suspect that said course will offer depth in a teachers personal area of curiosity and expertise and less the students interest. Especially when you consider these are small schools so it’s not like the teachers are about to create a huge variety of new classes from scratch and then be the only ones that can teach them every year.
A class doesn't need to follow the strict AP to be as rigorous (or more) than an AP course. Our child got 5's on AP Lit and APUSH from their Big 3 regular 11th grade English and US History courses...and our school has NO differentiated levels for those courses (there's no honors, etc. - everyone takes the same class). There was no tutor involved and not a lot of extra work. Teachers gave a small amount of feedback in the Spring on what the exam will look like and whether there was anything the teacher hadn't covered yet. It was not a heavy lift for our student - they had been taught at the high level AP required but with a curriculum and depth the teacher/school chose for the course. There are so many skeptics on the decreasing quality. The Blair Magnet science courses aren't all labeled AP - and those kids also get 5's on the AP subject exams. In both cases, these are smart kids with great teachers....there's no need to follow the rote AP formula. They get a better course AND get the "5" test score.
Wishful thinking. Some random course that reflects the teacher’s interest and the school’s priorities isn’t going to translate into a 5 on an AP test for most kids.
Not wishful thinking, it's facts. My child is not an outlier at this school....the kids do very very well on APs without an AP label on the course.
Oh yeah? It’s “facts” that every kid gets a 5 on every AP? And how do you know that? Do you work for the College Board?
i don't but it sure seems you do. i haven't seen someone blindly defend something like you defend the AP curriculum since Rudy Giuliani.
Wow, not the pp just an observer, but you certainly showed your true colors immediately attacking the pp by turning this into an ugly political battle. I would certainly not trust anything you say now. Get a grip please.
I’m not sure how I will ever recover from your rejection.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:sorry to be dense but can someone remind me why they decided to do this in the first place? Wasn't it somewhat controversial?
The claims were : students may pass up other courses to get the college credits from AP courses, and that moving away from the courses would allow them to offer a wider variety of courses that were equally rigorous and enriching.
However, I’ve yet to hear what rigorous courses are replacing the APs at all these schools. More I suspect that said course will offer depth in a teachers personal area of curiosity and expertise and less the students interest. Especially when you consider these are small schools so it’s not like the teachers are about to create a huge variety of new classes from scratch and then be the only ones that can teach them every year.
A class doesn't need to follow the strict AP to be as rigorous (or more) than an AP course. Our child got 5's on AP Lit and APUSH from their Big 3 regular 11th grade English and US History courses...and our school has NO differentiated levels for those courses (there's no honors, etc. - everyone takes the same class). There was no tutor involved and not a lot of extra work. Teachers gave a small amount of feedback in the Spring on what the exam will look like and whether there was anything the teacher hadn't covered yet. It was not a heavy lift for our student - they had been taught at the high level AP required but with a curriculum and depth the teacher/school chose for the course. There are so many skeptics on the decreasing quality. The Blair Magnet science courses aren't all labeled AP - and those kids also get 5's on the AP subject exams. In both cases, these are smart kids with great teachers....there's no need to follow the rote AP formula. They get a better course AND get the "5" test score.
Wishful thinking. Some random course that reflects the teacher’s interest and the school’s priorities isn’t going to translate into a 5 on an AP test for most kids.
Not wishful thinking, it's facts. My child is not an outlier at this school....the kids do very very well on APs without an AP label on the course.
Oh yeah? It’s “facts” that every kid gets a 5 on every AP? And how do you know that? Do you work for the College Board?
i don't but it sure seems you do. i haven't seen someone blindly defend something like you defend the AP curriculum since Rudy Giuliani.
Wow, not the pp just an observer, but you certainly showed your true colors immediately attacking the pp by turning this into an ugly political battle. I would certainly not trust anything you say now. Get a grip please.