Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They'll just adjust the laws to say if the person can occupy it's own seat. That's the original intent to occupy a seat.

Exactly. This whole thread is stupid.

What’s stupid is letting lawmakers make medical decisions. But I guess you think that’s fine. Injected bleach lately?

Yes, it is totally stupid for lawmakers to make medical decisions, but I guess you are fine and totally in favor of universal healthcare?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They'll just adjust the laws to say if the person can occupy it's own seat. That's the original intent to occupy a seat.

Exactly. This whole thread is stupid.

What’s stupid is letting lawmakers make medical decisions. But I guess you think that’s fine. Injected bleach lately?

Anonymous wrote:So if you have some embryos on dry ice in the passenger seat, does that mean you are ok in the HOV lanes now?

I would LOVE to see someone take on this challenge!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They'll just adjust the laws to say if the person can occupy it's own seat. That's the original intent to occupy a seat.

Exactly. This whole thread is stupid.

So adjust the laws to say you need to be able to occupy your own seat to have legal protection as a person.

Anonymous wrote:So if you have some embryos on dry ice in the passenger seat, does that mean you are ok in the HOV lanes now?

LOL!!!!!

Anonymous wrote:Pregnant women already get too many special privileges.

Right like a publicly owned uterus!

Anonymous wrote:So if you have some embryos on dry ice in the passenger seat, does that mean you are ok in the HOV lanes now?

That is a very good question.

Pregnant women already get too many special privileges.

Anonymous wrote:So if you have some embryos on dry ice in the passenger seat, does that mean you are ok in the HOV lanes now?

snicker

So if you have some embryos on dry ice in the passenger seat, does that mean you are ok in the HOV lanes now?

Anonymous wrote:They'll just adjust the laws to say if the person can occupy it's own seat. That's the original intent to occupy a seat.

A child is a seat within a seat. A fetus is in the uterus, safely packaged, inside something (because lets be clear pregnant women are vessels, not people) that is in a seat.

Its the same reason an embryo can be frozen but a newborn cant. One is not a person, the other is. And yet....here we are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They'll just adjust the laws to say if the person can occupy it's own seat. That's the original intent to occupy a seat.

Exactly. This whole thread is stupid.

Even cnn said that

Anonymous wrote:They'll just adjust the laws to say if the person can occupy it's own seat. That's the original intent to occupy a seat.

Exactly. This whole thread is stupid.

They'll just adjust the laws to say if the person can occupy it's own seat. That's the original intent to occupy a seat.

Anonymous wrote:If a fetus is considered a human life, then shouldn't pregnant women be able to use the HOV lanes?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jul/09/texas-woman-ticket-abortion-roe-v-wade

HOV laws don't state that the "person" has to exist outside the body, and since pro-birth states have deemed the fetus as a living person, why can't pregnant women use HOV lanes?

Supreme Court rules the HOV lanes are illegal because HOV lanes are not in the constitution. Next they are going after airplanes. Yeah I am a conservative!